• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Microsoft has Closed the Activision Blizzard King Deal

Papa_Wisdom

Member
Don’t tease us. As a former sega die hard ( I had 4 Japanese Saturn’s at one point) 😂😂 Who migrated to Xbox for panzer dragoon, gun valkery and outrun, I hope they get a lot closer. I feel like sega was always meant to become the Japanese arm of Xbox, thus giving sega a console brand presence again in Japan. But Xbox would have to acquire sega for that to happen.

And who knows maybe the extra cash could fund passion projects like a panzer dragoon saga remake, or a burning rangers reboot. sega might seem to have trouble porting old Saturn games, but I bet Xbox engineers could do a great Saturn and DC emulation platform for Xbox and PC if they were allowed to. Could you imagine all those classic sega games being readily available and emulated to Xbox standards on gamepass? That would be my personal gaming heaven.


And then they can sell limited edition sega themed Xbox’s in the west to tie in with certain sega releases. I’d buy the virtual-on or panzer dragoon special editions for sure. 😂😂
Are you me?
 

bbw_lover87

Member
Not defending this "old executive" because I know him on a personal level but he cares about gamers more than any other high level exec at any of these companies.

He laughed at the internal screening of the Craig version of Halo Infinite and said out loud in the meeting that they could not give that to gamers, they will tear us to shreds but Phil greenlit it

I just have countless stories of where him and Phil would butt heads over decision making because he cared about what we would be playing but most times he lost

Not saying he is a great leader because he too got the whole Series X is 20% more powerful and we will win every head to head battle but I think thats because Jason Ronald kept telling him and Phil that
I think he greenlited killer instinct too
 
I already made my point in other thread explaining why Gamepass is superior, but I will tell you this. Imagine a Xbox fanboy saying that Xbox had the best games in the One/PS4 era only because he likes more Gears, Halo and the few games Xbox was releasing.

Gamepass superior is your opinion, and everyone can have their own opinion. It’s not a fact.

To be honest, that were some great games back in the time so there was some merit to it if you liked those Xbox games more than the Sony and Nintendo offering.

Unfortunately for MS their exclusives are rapidly dwindling in number and quality since the last decade and Nintendo and Sony are still as good as ever.
 
Gamepass superior is your opinion, and everyone can have their own opinion. It’s not a fact.

To be honest, that were some great games back in the time so there was some merit to it if you liked those Xbox games more than the Sony and Nintendo offering.

Unfortunately for MS their exclusives are rapidly dwindling in number and quality since the last decade and Nintendo and Sony are still as good as ever.
Talks about stating an opinion as a fact and then goes and states an opinion as a fact.
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
These Heisenberg007 Heisenberg007 vs Heisenberg007 Heisenberg007 comments are confusing me :)
So are we now pivoting to tinfoil hat conspiracy theories on how Activision came to be open for getting acquired?

Very happy to see the deal done and dusted.
You tagged me twice, so I can totally believe your confusion 😛 🤣

And not really tinfoil hat conspiracy theories. The MS executive being in ABK is true. You can double-check.
 
Last edited:
You tagged me twice, so I can totally believe your confusion 😛 🤣

And not really tinfoil hat conspiracy theories. The MS executive being in ABK is true. You can double-check.
Ooops, about the double-tag :)

Oh I know he was there. The tinfoil hat conspiracy is that he was sent there to torpedo Activision or to prep the way for an acquisition.

Edit: By that logic, Phil Harrison was seny by Sony to both MS and Google to sink their products...oh wait! lol
 
Last edited:

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
Ooops, about the double-tag :)

Oh I know he was there. The conspiracy is that he was sent there to torpedo Activision or to prep the way for an acquisition.
This is an old tactic by Microsoft. Even in the most recent leaks, we saw how Microsoft planted an ex-BOD that was buying Nintendo shares to create an opportunity for Microsoft to buy Nintendo.

It's not really a conspiracy theory when there is precedence.
 
This is an old tactic by Microsoft. Even in the most recent leaks, we saw how Microsoft planted an ex-BOD that was buying Nintendo shares to create an opportunity for Microsoft to buy Nintendo.

It's not really a conspiracy theory when there is precedence.
How is that remotely the same thing as an Ex MS exec going to work for another company to torpedo them conspiracy.
Buying shares is a common practice by lots of companies. For example, Sony buying shares in Epic doesn't necessarily mean they are going to buy Epic anytime soon if ever.
 

DenchDeckard

Moderated wildly
This is actually a result of Microsoft planting an old executive in ABK that continued the company's downfall and the aforementioned shitty situation due to poor management, which led to Microsoft finding an opportunity.

And that executive is now back at Microsoft, as he was before.
Burnie Burns Conspiracy GIF by Rooster Teeth
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
How is that remotely the same thing as an Ex MS exec going to work for another company to torpedo them conspiracy.
Buying shares is a common practice by lots of companies. For example, Sony buying shares in Epic doesn't necessarily mean they are going to buy Epic anytime soon if ever.
Buying shares =/= Planting someone else to buy shares and gain influence so they can pave the way for your acquisition.
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
lol, yea. That's called a conspiracy and not a proven fact.
Not conspiracy, when we have that in writing, straight from the horse's mouth. You can choose to close your eyes to it though :)

"I say until recently as our former MS BOD member ValueAct has been heavily acquiring shares of Nintendo and I've kept in touch with Mason Morfit as he's been acquiring. It's likely he will be pushing for more from Nintendo stock which could create opportunities for us. Without the catalyst, I don't see an angle to a near term mutually agreeable merger of Nintendo and MS." -- Phil Spencer.

spencer-email-1695118825623.png
 
Not conspiracy, when we have that in writing, straight from the horse's mouth. You can choose to close your eyes to it though :)

"I say until recently as our former MS BOD member ValueAct has been heavily acquiring shares of Nintendo and I've kept in touch with Mason Morfit as he's been acquiring. It's likely he will be pushing for more from Nintendo stock which could create opportunities for us. Without the catalyst, I don't see an angle to a near term mutually agreeable merger of Nintendo and MS." -- Phil Spencer.

spencer-email-1695118825623.png
You're being intentionally obtuse. What proof do you have that Mike Ybarra was sent to Activision to torpedo the company or prepare them for an acquisition?
I'm not talking about anyone buying shares into a company. Buying shares vs sending what is essentially an "insider" to saborage a company is not anywhere remotely the same thing.

Edit: That document doesn't even prove your initial point that MS intentionally even pushed for that or even had a hand in making that happen.
 
Last edited:

Topher

Identifies as young
Not conspiracy, when we have that in writing, straight from the horse's mouth. You can choose to close your eyes to it though :)

"I say until recently as our former MS BOD member ValueAct has been heavily acquiring shares of Nintendo and I've kept in touch with Mason Morfit as he's been acquiring. It's likely he will be pushing for more from Nintendo stock which could create opportunities for us. Without the catalyst, I don't see an angle to a near term mutually agreeable merger of Nintendo and MS." -- Phil Spencer.

spencer-email-1695118825623.png

That ain't proof of "Microsoft planting an old executive in ABK" my man.
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
That ain't proof of "Microsoft planting an old executive in ABK" my man.
This reply was in response to him saying that "buying shares is a common practice," implying that Microsoft was buying Nintendo shares normally -- which isn't the case, as MS wasn't directly buying Nintendo shares.
 

ManaByte

Banned
didn't they do something similar with Nokia?
People weren't even really around for that and invent all kinds of crazy conspiracies about it. The reality is that Windows Phone never took off due to their store and because developers weren't releasing Windows Phone versions of major apps. Big ones like Snapchat and Gmail were never made on the OS. That's what happened to Windows Phone/Nokia. Not some nutbar conspiracy of MS intentionally torpedoing it.


 
This reply was in response to him saying that "buying shares is a common practice," implying that Microsoft was buying Nintendo shares normally -- which isn't the case, as MS wasn't directly buying Nintendo shares.
That isn't what I said at all. I said companines buying shares into other companies isn't an uncommon practice at all. And that document still doesn't even say that they were doing that either.
You're reading what you want into it.
 
People weren't even really around for that and invent all kinds of crazy conspiracies about it. The reality is that Windows Phone never took off due to their store and because developers weren't releasing Windows Phone versions of major apps. Big ones like Snapchat and Gmail were never made on the OS. That's what happened to Windows Phone/Nokia. Not some nutbar conspiracy of MS intentionally torpedoing it.


i was talking about some MS executive jumping to Nokia...then the MS acquisition happened.

I think is a noting burger but is funny



 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
Where's the proof of the plant then?
For Activision? Seriously, will we ever get proof of such a thing? That's not the world we live in. We'll never get proof of that, but it is common sense, especially when there's precedence.

This is Microsoft 101. It is their long-time strategy. They did this before as well. Now they did it again.

Do you not know what happened with Nokia and Stephen Elop?

Here is a quick rundown:
  • Balmer and Gates met Elop multiple times and poached him.
  • Elop worked at Microsoft in key positions.
  • In August 2009, under his presidency, Elop's department partnered with Nokia to bring Microsoft Office Mobile to Symbian OS.
  • In September 2010, Elop left Microsoft to join Nokia as CEO.
  • Just ~5 months later, Elop announced a new strategy for Nokia that was mainly about phasing out Symbian OS and shifting to Microsoft's Windows Phone.
  • In 2011, Elop laid off 11,000 Nokia employees.
  • In 2012, Elop laid off a further 10,000 Nokia employees.
  • Nokia's stock price dropped 62%. Their market share fell from 33% to 3%.
  • Just a year later, in June 2013, it was reported that Nokia and Microsoft were in the final stages of the acquisition.
  • In September 2013, Microsoft announced Nokia's acquisition.
I never said that I have proof of Yabarra acting as a mole. You shared your opinion; I shared mine.

We can choose to live in a fool's paradise, but it is really laid bare in front of us. It is similar to how people were saying for years that Game Pass cannibalizes game sales, and others were saying, "do you have proof? No? Then no, Game Pass does not cannibalize game sales."

We rarely get proof of such things. But we have common sense and logic that we can use to connect the dots -- especially when the exact same things have happened before.

ChorizoPicozo ChorizoPicozo - exactly. Didn't see your reply, but I just posted this.
 
Last edited:

Pallas

Member
I’m just glad this ride finally came to an end. Will be interesting to see how many games by Activision will hit Gamepass eventually.

The CoD vault in particular still has decade old games still being regularly played. Gamepass subscription(PC and console side)should see a sharp increase I imagine if those games hit the service?
 

Topher

Identifies as young
For Activision? Seriously, will we ever get proof of such a thing? That's not the world we live in. We'll never get proof of that, but it is common sense, especially when there's precedence.

This is Microsoft 101. It is their long-time strategy. They did this before as well. Now they did it again.

Do you not know what happened with Nokia and Stephen Elop?

Here is a quick rundown:
  • Balmer and Gates met Elop multiple times and poached him.
  • Elop worked at Microsoft in key positions.
  • In August 2009, under his presidency, Elop's department partnered with Nokia to bring Microsoft Office Mobile to Symbian OS.
  • In September 2010, Elop left Microsoft to join Nokia as CEO.
  • Just ~5 months later, Elop announced a new strategy for Nokia that was mainly about phasing out Symbian OS and shifting to Microsoft's Windows Phone.
  • In 2011, Elop laid off 11,000 Nokia employees.
  • In 2012, Elop laid off a further 10,000 Nokia employees.
  • Nokia's stock price dropped 62%. Their market share fell from 33% to 3%.
  • Just a year later, in June 2013, it was reported that Nokia and Microsoft were in the final stages of the acquisition.
  • In September 2013, Microsoft announced Nokia's acquisition.
I never said that I have proof of Yabarra acting as a mole. You shared your opinion; I shared mine.

We can choose to live in a fool's paradise, but it is really laid bare in front of us. It is similar to how people were saying for years that Game Pass cannibalizes game sales, and others were saying, "do you have proof? No? Then no, Game Pass does not cannibalize game sales."

We rarely get proof of such things. But we have common sense and logic that we can use to connect the dots -- especially when the exact same things have happened before.

ChorizoPicozo ChorizoPicozo - exactly. Didn't see your reply, but I just posted this.

I know you never said you had proof. I was just asking. That's a fine theory. I don't buy it at all (as far as Ybarra anyway), but still a fine theory.
 
Last edited:

Fess

Member
And not really tinfoil hat conspiracy theories. The MS executive being in ABK is true. You can double-check.
I don’t buy the idea that it’s somehow planned but it’s certainly a bit comical, seems like there is some positive energy at least among some of the higher ups. Rod Fergusson joked on X about his own returnal too, a third time is the charm post and wondered if he could have his old MS employee card back where he was thinner lol
There was some other guy who had been at both companies and left both and now he’s back at both like a boomerang heh
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
For Activision? Seriously, will we ever get proof of such a thing? That's not the world we live in. We'll never get proof of that, but it is common sense, especially when there's precedence.

This is Microsoft 101. It is their long-time strategy. They did this before as well. Now they did it again.

Do you not know what happened with Nokia and Stephen Elop?

Here is a quick rundown:
  • Balmer and Gates met Elop multiple times and poached him.
  • Elop worked at Microsoft in key positions.
  • In August 2009, under his presidency, Elop's department partnered with Nokia to bring Microsoft Office Mobile to Symbian OS.
  • In September 2010, Elop left Microsoft to join Nokia as CEO.
  • Just ~5 months later, Elop announced a new strategy for Nokia that was mainly about phasing out Symbian OS and shifting to Microsoft's Windows Phone.
  • In 2011, Elop laid off 11,000 Nokia employees.
  • In 2012, Elop laid off a further 10,000 Nokia employees.
  • Nokia's stock price dropped 62%. Their market share fell from 33% to 3%.
  • Just a year later, in June 2013, it was reported that Nokia and Microsoft were in the final stages of the acquisition.
  • In September 2013, Microsoft announced Nokia's acquisition.
I never said that I have proof of Yabarra acting as a mole. You shared your opinion; I shared mine.

We can choose to live in a fool's paradise, but it is really laid bare in front of us. It is similar to how people were saying for years that Game Pass cannibalizes game sales, and others were saying, "do you have proof? No? Then no, Game Pass does not cannibalize game sales."

We rarely get proof of such things. But we have common sense and logic that we can use to connect the dots -- especially when the exact same things have happened before.

ChorizoPicozo ChorizoPicozo - exactly. Didn't see your reply, but I just posted this.


Please share your fanfiction.net handle with us too :messenger_grinning_sweat:
 
That ain't proof of "Microsoft planting an old executive in ABK" my man.
I will throw this out there and I have zero point I am trying make before people call me crazy so let me get that disclaimer out of the way

That said Mike told me a few times he wanted Phil to make COD some sort of exclusive for this current gen and told Phil no matter the cost even if its just 6 months that it needed to happen.

They could not make that happen and next thing we know Mike is at ABK and this deal happens.

Now I know how much Mike made salary wise at Xbox and what his raise was to go to ABK so the money alone was worth the move and I am not implying he did it to facilitate the buyout

Just the timing could have been better
 

Kilau

Member
For Activision? Seriously, will we ever get proof of such a thing? That's not the world we live in. We'll never get proof of that, but it is common sense, especially when there's precedence.

This is Microsoft 101. It is their long-time strategy. They did this before as well. Now they did it again.

Do you not know what happened with Nokia and Stephen Elop?

Here is a quick rundown:
  • Balmer and Gates met Elop multiple times and poached him.
  • Elop worked at Microsoft in key positions.
  • In August 2009, under his presidency, Elop's department partnered with Nokia to bring Microsoft Office Mobile to Symbian OS.
  • In September 2010, Elop left Microsoft to join Nokia as CEO.
  • Just ~5 months later, Elop announced a new strategy for Nokia that was mainly about phasing out Symbian OS and shifting to Microsoft's Windows Phone.
  • In 2011, Elop laid off 11,000 Nokia employees.
  • In 2012, Elop laid off a further 10,000 Nokia employees.
  • Nokia's stock price dropped 62%. Their market share fell from 33% to 3%.
  • Just a year later, in June 2013, it was reported that Nokia and Microsoft were in the final stages of the acquisition.
  • In September 2013, Microsoft announced Nokia's acquisition.
I never said that I have proof of Yabarra acting as a mole. You shared your opinion; I shared mine.

We can choose to live in a fool's paradise, but it is really laid bare in front of us. It is similar to how people were saying for years that Game Pass cannibalizes game sales, and others were saying, "do you have proof? No? Then no, Game Pass does not cannibalize game sales."

We rarely get proof of such things. But we have common sense and logic that we can use to connect the dots -- especially when the exact same things have happened before.

ChorizoPicozo ChorizoPicozo - exactly. Didn't see your reply, but I just posted this.

Funny Face Halloween GIF by 60 Second Docs
 

MarkMe2525

Gold Member
Because our regulators don’t care about free markets and the biggest companies have the most money/lawyers/lobbyists to ensure that is the case and the system continues to be rigged in their favor
??? A tenant of the "free market" is allowing companies to compete in an unrestricted environment. Our regulators blocking an acquisition would literally be the antithesis of the free market.

Your assertion contradicts itself.
 

James Sawyer Ford

Gold Member
Yeah, Sony and Nintendo don't stand a chance now. Give me a break.

Also, monopolies are a side effect of a "free market", not the antithesis. This is why "free markets" don't exist in our economy. Maybe you mean another term.

Your arguments have been demolished by centuries of experience with "free markets" leading to collusion/monopolies and the establishment of regulators such as the SEC.

Do you think they should be abolished?
 
Gamepass superior is your opinion, and everyone can have their own opinion. It’s not a fact.

To be honest, that were some great games back in the time so there was some merit to it if you liked those Xbox games more than the Sony and Nintendo offering.

Unfortunately for MS their exclusives are rapidly dwindling in number and quality since the last decade and Nintendo and Sony are still as good as ever.
Day one games vs not having day one games is pretty much indisputable tho.
 

MarkMe2525

Gold Member
Your arguments have been demolished by centuries of experience with "free markets" leading to collusion/monopolies and the establishment of regulators such as the SEC.

Do you think they should be abolished?
Dude, you are just wrong. Accept the L or reword your assertion. The SEC is an example of how are economy is no longer a free market, but a hybrid. The SEC was formed due to the inevitable outcomes of an unregulated economy (which is a free market).
 

James Sawyer Ford

Gold Member
Dude, you are just wrong. Accept the L or reword your assertion. The SEC is an example of how are economy is no longer a free market, but a hybrid. The SEC was formed due to the inevitable outcomes of an unregulated economy (which is a free market).

I do not agree with "free markets" that allow companies to grow so big that they swallow up entire swaths of industries, employ political power to allow sand maintain such control, while leading to long term decay in the quality of such services those industries supply.

It leads to crony capitalism which does not benefit consumers or lead to better economic outcomes. That's why the regulators should serve a purpose to allow competition.
 

MarkMe2525

Gold Member
I do not agree with "free markets" that allow companies to grow so big that they swallow up entire swaths of industries, employ political power to allow sand maintain such control, while leading to long term decay in the quality of such services those industries supply.

It leads to crony capitalism which does not benefit consumers or lead to better economic outcomes. That's why the regulators should serve a purpose to allow competition.
I agree with your opinion that regulation is needed. In saying that, there is only one definition of a free market, and regulation has no place in that definition. If you mean something else, that is fine.

My pushback boils down to semantics, but when discussing these things, it kind of matters to get the terminology correct so that your opinion makes sense.
 
Top Bottom