• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Microsoft launches X Elite based Surfaces, partner laptops in a push towards ARM

LordOfChaos

Member
lcimg_eb1aff8b_a229_472b_a467_e89a47d1a413.jpeg


https://blogs.windows.com/devices/?p=263457?ocid=aid_soc_usoc_evnt_cons_sur_eng_tw_Blog


On one hand they levelled up their product websites a lot, on the other hand they also borrowed what I never liked about the Apple pages with the scrolling based elements and scroll jacking


It's up there in expensiveness too, but if it approaches even M3 performance while delivering that big uplift in battery life as they're promising it not only does but even beats it by a bit at, it's a big step up for Surface and other thin and light laptops, even if not beating M4 yet
 
Last edited:

Kilau

Member
Not that gaming would the priority on these but I guess we can see how they perform now since Qualcomm said most games “should” work.
 
For the first time in a while, Surface device looks actually good - decent price too. Hope Snapdragon performance is also as good as stated.
 

BadBurger

Banned
I like this push towards ARM by Microsoft in the consumer level space. We've been stuck with x86-64 forever and it's a power consuming monster. Here we are in 2024 and to run a halfway decent system you need a gigantic power supply while also dealing with stupid amounts of heat.

I look forward to having a good laptop that doesn't burn my lap after an hour of usage.
 
Interested in seeing performance numbers

Windows is Windows and giving it a creepy AI that monitors everything you do on your computer 24/7 isn't going to make people like it more

I just want to see how close we are to finally breaking PC gaming out of the x86 walled prison
 
Last edited:

Fermbiz

Gold Member
Im about to purchase the Surface Pro X Elite with the OLED screen. I want to purchase their Thunderbolt 4 dock, but it seems rather expensive. Does anyone know if the dock worth purchasing from them?
 

LordOfChaos

Member
Im about to purchase the Surface Pro X Elite with the OLED screen. I want to purchase their Thunderbolt 4 dock, but it seems rather expensive. Does anyone know if the dock worth purchasing from them?

Nice. I think you can just get any Thunderbolt 4 dock though.
 
On a scale of 1 to 10, how big is the change to ARM?
Wholesale architecture changes for most OSes are routine and maybe 1 out of 10, but in terms of Windows it's more around a 38 out of 10. Windows has never, ever successfully changed underlying CPU architectures in it's entire 30+ years history. Windows started on x86 in 1985, 38 years ago, and today it is still on x86.

Every other operating system on the planet has been ported to other architectures or is available for multiple architectures. Linux is available for everything that can run DOOM and many things that can't. Mac OS has gone through multiple architecture changes, from Motorola 68000 to PowerPC to Intel x86 and recently to Apple Silicon.

The only operating system which has never changed architectures, and it's NOT because MS has never tried, is Windows. MS has tried repeatedly to get Windows off x86, including porting it to MIPS, PowerPC, Itanium, and I'm sure there are other internal projects that never saw the light of day. Windows on ARM is only MS's latest attempt and it's their most serious one because everyone can see the writing on the wall. x86's days are numbered and MS doesn't want to be caught dead with Windows stuck on a dying architecture.
 
Last edited:

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
It means you get the same performance for a lot less processing demand, and a lot less heat. It's basically the next generation for Windows devices.

It also better allows them to compete with Apple devices,

Aside from the Surface line, it also sounds like something they would do if they're serious about pursuing a portable gaming device.
 

Drew1440

Member
Wholesale architecture changes for most OSes are routine and maybe 1 out of 10, but in terms of Windows it's more around a 38 out of 10. Windows has never, ever successfully changed underlying CPU architectures in it's entire 30+ years history. Windows started on x86 in 1985, 38 years ago, and today it is still on x86.

Every other operating system on the planet has been ported to other architectures or is available for multiple architectures. Linux is available for everything that can run DOOM and many things that can't. Mac OS has gone through multiple architecture changes, from Motorola 68000 to PowerPC to Intel x86 and recently to Apple Silicon.

The only operating system which has never changed architectures, and it's NOT because MS has never tried, is Windows. MS has tried repeatedly to get Windows off x86, including porting it to MIPS, PowerPC, Itanium, and I'm sure there are other internal projects that never saw the light of day. Windows on ARM is only MS's latest attempt and it's their most serious one because everyone can see the writing on the wall. x86's days are numbered and MS doesn't want to be caught dead with Windows stuck on a dying architecture.
They did try in the 90's with Windows NT, which was designed to run on PowerPC/MIPS and the DEC Alpha. Sadly these processors never took off for the workstation market and x86 remained king. The main issue has always been backwards compatibility, everyone wants to run their existing software without any compromises in compatibility or speed.
It's more of a testament to how well designed X86 was, and how Intel/AMD were able to keep it competitive against RISC.
 

Xyphie

Member
If Prism is good, I wonder if there's enough efficiency gain left over after translation to make an X Elite handheld interesting...Could make the form factor less bulky or provide more battery life in game


I think Qualcomm getting a good Windows GPU driver for Adreno is a bigger challenge in the short term than doing the x86 -> ARM translation layer. We've seen Intel's efforts in that space and they've already spent the last +20 years doing a Windows GPU driver. Should be interesting when Qualcomm's exclusivity deal expires if we see a nVidia ARM SoC for Windows.
 

LordOfChaos

Member
This one takes screenshots of each interaction and runs it through an LLM using your cpu resources to find out what you're doing, what's on your screen, etc. They call it Recall.

It's creepy as fuck.

So turn it off

There's software on macOS that you have to pay a third party a lot for this feature, Rewind AI. You'd be able to tell if it was still doing it while off. I think people are being a little dramatic. It also runs on the low power NPU and not the CPU.
 
Last edited:

Dr. Claus

Banned
So turn it off

There's software on macOS that you have to pay a third party a lot for this feature, Rewind AI. You'd be able to tell if it was still doing it while off. I think people are being a little dramatic. It also runs on the low power NPU and not the CPU.

It is just as shitty and creepy on Mac as it is here. Doesn't make it acceptable.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
Surface laptops too thin. I’ve been using one at work for years.

It’s kind hard to open it and that god awful thin power cord that goes into the side falls out easily (it’s a thin toothpick shaped thing magnetically held in) Much easier to come out than a traditional power cord with a round input.
 

bender

What time is it?
They did try in the 90's with Windows NT, which was designed to run on PowerPC/MIPS and the DEC Alpha. Sadly these processors never took off for the workstation market and x86 remained king. The main issue has always been backwards compatibility, everyone wants to run their existing software without any compromises in compatibility or speed.
It's more of a testament to how well designed X86 was, and how Intel/AMD were able to keep it competitive against RISC.

NT 4.0 is still favorite Microsoft OS.
 

LordOfChaos

Member
Hmmmnnnnn

"Jen-Hsun, Does Nvidia have a place in the AI PC?" Michael Dell: "Check with him next year". Seems to hint at the Nvidia Windows on ARM chip for next year, hardware is getting crazy breakneck!

 

diffusionx

Gold Member
So turn it off

There's software on macOS that you have to pay a third party a lot for this feature, Rewind AI. You'd be able to tell if it was still doing it while off. I think people are being a little dramatic. It also runs on the low power NPU and not the CPU.
Haha look at this dude

He thinks turning it off actually turns it off
 

LordOfChaos

Member
Haha look at this dude

He thinks turning it off actually turns it off

I don't think they've implemented physics defying technology where among millions of users no one would notice an increase in power, NPU usage, and networking if it stayed on even if you turned it off, just so they can tell the mothership you're into pikachu porn

The point of the NPU is also that it runs on the system and doesn't send anything back
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom