Bradley isn't getting maxed by the Celtics. He too unreliable from an availability standpoint and a one trick pony on offense.That's not a joke? Unless you think either will sign for less.
Kawhi is questionable for Game 3.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/6c45nf/kawhi_leonard_king_of_advance_stats_this_playoffs/Kawhi Leonard : King of Advance Stats (This Playoffs so far) (self.nba)
1st in TS% (15 FGA/game required)
1st in PER
1st in EWA
1st in WS/48
1st in VORP
3rd in Pts/100 (30 MPG required)
4th in BPM
Bradley isn't getting maxed by the Celtics. He too unreliable from an availability standpoint and a one trick pony on offense.
Yeah they will.. Why do you think they are drafting Fultz? He has potentially can solve the IT or Bradley contact situations when that time comes. Guards are leaving or getting traded. There no way around that with their roster.Then they'll lose him. He's worth max on open market.
Doncic looks completely lost among the older pros.
lol @ how fast this thread turns on people
horford was literally a top 3 player in the playoffs through the first 2 series. put a guy next to him that can battle thompson on the boards and this discussion isn't happening.
Watching the Euroleague semi finals.
Anthony Bennett looking nice getting paid to watch the game from the sidelines.
Doncic looks completely lost among the older pros.
He's only like 17 right now. Its remarkable at all that he's playing
It needs to be said...it was better than any playoff game i've watched this year. Beautiful game all around.
the worst part is that i'm sure a lot of boston agreesBill Simmons' brilliant advice for the Celtics crowd tonight is to chant "you're a baby" at Lebron. I feel better about tonight's game already.
Memories be so short. Horford has been been really, really good in the playoffs.
Though he's not an elite rebounder, Horford can do just about everything else. Only three other players are averaging at least 15.8 points, 7.7 rebounds and 6.1 assists during the postseason: LeBron James, Russell Westbrook and Paul George. Horford currently tops the NBA in playoff true shooting percentage (a measurement of shooting efficiency) while ranking fourth in 3-point percentage (56.7). He ranks third in overall playoff win shares, trailing only James and Kawhi Leonard; fifth in VORP, trailing only Leonard, James, James Harden and Draymond Green; and ninth in box plus/minus, if you prefer that statistic.
the worst part is that i'm sure a lot of boston agrees
Watching the Euroleague semi finals.
Anthony Bennett looking nice getting paid to watch the game from the sidelines.
Doncic looks completely lost among the older pros.
u/boxonfire said:I've been researching why ryan anderson seems to struggle so much at home vs away: His shooting splits at home vs away this season:
Home:
FG%: 37.0 3PT%: 33.2 FT%: 77.3
Away:
FG%: 46.1 3PT%: 46.7% FT%: 92.9%
His shooting at home vs away is a very real and statistically significant difference. I recently read that Tracy mcgrady's complained about depth perception issues at Toyota center.
I hadn't heard about this problem before but as a half color blind person myself, I'm aware that color plays a role in depth perception. Red-green color blindness is a common form.
You can read in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14872343 that "Color does impact our depth perception even though it is a relatively weak indicator and is not necessarily the overriding depth cue for complex, realistic objects." Some more real life examples include pilots having to take color tests due to depth perception being incredibly important.
I believe Ryan anderson's struggles at home are a result of his depth perception being skewed as he perceives the basket is closer than it really is. Depth cues like the red padding behind the basket and lines distort his depth perception and thus affect his ability to accurately gauge the distance between himself and the basket. Some would argue that shooting is muscle memory at this point in his career, but you wouldn't tell someone to shoot with their eyes closed. Visual cues still play an important role.
This could have been some anomaly, but I thought about which other teams had a predominantly red court. Chicago comes to mind. His career shooting splits in chicago?
Chicacgo:
FG%: 33.5 3PT%: 29.1% FT%: 87%
For reference, his career shooting splits:
FG%: 42.3% 3PT%: 38.1% FT%: 86.1%
So what's the solution to this? I don't see a color scheming change happening anytime soon for the rockets. Glasses aren't exactly the most appealing option either. Just thought it was worth pointing out so they can figure out a solution to accomodate him.
For reference he also shot 29% from 3 @HOU in the 10 games before he became a Rocket.
To clarify, I don't think red on red is his problem. It's red as a dominant visual cue in general that affects his ability to gauge distance. So teams like cavs, hawks where red is not the primary color wouldn't affect him as much.
According to the numbers he's right there. Give credit where credit is due.You can say that Horford had been good in the playoffs but still laugh at someone who says he is the third best player in the playoffs.
According to the numbers he's right there. Give credit where credit is due.
What???? No one said this.The credit is "He's been good in the playoffs" I laugh at someone who says they wouldn't trade Curry or Durrant for Horford because of numbers.
What???? No one said this.
lol @ how fast this thread turns on people
horford was literally a top 3 player in the playoffs through the first 2 series. put a guy next to him that can battle thompson on the boards and this discussion isn't happening.
Horford had been a top 3 performer in the playoffs and it's backed up by stats. Does that mean he's more valuable than Durant or Curry? Of course not, and no one would say that they'd rather have him over those two.Someone responding to that was what got this started.
Horford had been a top 3 performer in the playoffs and it's backed up by stats. Does that mean he's more valuable than Durant or Curry? Of course not, and no one would say that they'd rather have him over those two.
I honestly don't understand your argument right now.
His stats have been better. It helps that he has played more competitive games while the Warriors are involved in blowouts almost every night.To even say that he's been better than those two is silly to me.
His stats have been better. It helps that he has played more competitive games while the Warriors are involved in blowouts almost every night.
Yeah they will.. Why do you think they are drafting Fultz? He has potentially can solve the IT or Bradley contact situations when that time comes. Guards are leaving or getting traded. There no way around that with their roster.
Ok if you watched the games where he got those stats you wouldn't be laughing.Yea, that's fair.
All I'm saying is that I don't begrudge someone for laughing at "Al Horford has been a top 3 player in these playoffs"
Even if stats back it up.
On a max contract? No way. Give him $18m/year sure but a max for an undersized SG who can't create his own shot is a bad idea.Bradley is a dude you want a title contender. Or at least I would. Fultz, Bradley, Brown could be an awesome core.
Ok if you watched the games where he got those stats you wouldn't be laughing.
The Gerald Green experiment again..not that It will matter for the series but it's silly in general.
The Gerald Green experiment again..not that It will matter for the series but it's silly in general.
Well, until they get a 5....
Trust C processFuck the Celtics
Go cav