Is it a cap move or is Tim Thomas coming back? Don't they have Nabokov? How has he played?
Would the Islanders be able to toll his contract if he doesn't report?Cap move. Thomas has every intention of playing next season.
I guess they had to do it, but I'm not happy. Not happy at all.
Would the Islanders be able to toll his contract if he doesn't report?
I think you've lost track of how the conversation started. We have never disagreed that the team is doing well considering they're missing Kesler and Booth (that's what you were replying to, after all). That is a background assumption that doesn't need to be addressed. The only disagreement is that you believe that 5-2-2 does reflect how well they've played, while I think that if they keep playing at this quality that they could easily start losing those points instead of winning them.My point is it's a reach to expect them to be even "half as convincing" as the past two seasons when they're missing arguably their most important forward, and another second line forward on top of that.
"fine" is good. We could easily be going under without Kesler and Booth, but we're not only staying afloat, but keeping touch with the top teams in the conference.
I would love it if Thomas showed up and forced the Islanders to pay him his salary for the season.
I doubt it. He has said numerous times he wants to compete next season.
...well with the Islanders it's not really competing, soo...
Tim Thomas in the heart of Brooklyn. I find this.... amusing.
Tim Thomas in the heart of Brooklyn. I find this.... amusing.
Fucking lol at this trade
What is even the point
Thomas was never going to play for the Bruins again anyway. I'm glad they could get something for his expiring contract and open up some cap space.
To reach the cap floor.Fucking lol at this trade
What is even the point
Thomas was never going to play for the Bruins again anyway. I'm glad they could get something for his expiring contract and open up some cap space.
I don't think the Bruins would take him back at this point. Isn't this the last season his contract too?That's not correct at all. At least from Thomas's desire.
This move is purely based on cap space.
I think you've lost track of how the conversation started. We have never disagreed that the team is doing well considering they're missing Kesler and Booth (that's what you were replying to, after all). That is a background assumption that doesn't need to be addressed. The only disagreement is that you believe that 5-2-2 does reflect how well they've played, while I think that if they keep playing at this quality that they could easily start losing those points instead of winning them.
Their GFPG, GAPG, PP% and PK% tells part of the story. Their record and place in the standings betrays how mediocre they've actually been.
I don't believe they have to pay him. He just counts against their cap. They can just suspend him without pay for the rest of the season.To reach the cap floor.
It doesn't seem so bizarre to me. If he doesn't play a single game, then they lose nothing. They have to pay him, but they had to pay someone anyhow. And if he does play the minimum games next season, then they've potentially snagged an elite goaltender (albeit probably for just one season).
Pick is conditional on him playing a minimum games.That is an incredible return for the Bruins even if it's a 2014 2nd.
Moved the cap space, got a 2nd in 2013 or 2014 from a perennial lottery team, and moved on from the Thomas circus.
Great move.
That's what I thought initially, but someone above said they'd have to pay him.I don't believe they have to pay him. He just counts against their cap. They can just suspend him without pay for the rest of the season.
I don't think the Bruins would take him back at this point. Isn't this the last season his contract too?
Islanders should have just taken Kaberle off our hands for a 5th rounder
I'm assuming Thomas didn't have a NTC or it ran out?
It also appears to be a '14 or '15 2nd Rd Pick. Still good.Pick is conditional on him playing a minimum games.
Either way it's a good move. I'm sure they would've liked to get more out of an asset like Thomas, but Thomas basically handcuffed them.
That's what I thought initially, but someone above said they'd have to pay him.
So really the trade works well for both teams.
Even if Thomas wanted to play in Boston, the Bruins have moved on.That's not correct at all. At least from Thomas's desire.
This move is purely based on cap space.
Not the word I would have chosen.I don't see why they wouldn't. If you could take him off the books and have him ready to go for the following season, why not keep one of the best goaltenders in hockey?
For all we knew, there could have been no season. You'd have a mentally refreshed Thomas ready to go when hockey picked back up.
Even if Thomas wanted to play in Boston, the Bruins have moved on.
Win win for both teams.
The Isles just need him to reach cap floor
And the Buins get some cap relief.
I dont think the 2nd rounder is going anywhere.
The Boston Bruins only get a draft pick from the Islanders for Tim Thomas if he reports to them or any other team if NYI trade his rights.
The condition is for the year, not the pick itself. Islanders just gave a 2nd rounder for a cap hit.
@ said:#Isles GM Garth Snow: "This move gives us roster flexibility." 2nd-rounder is conditional on Tim Thomas playing at least 1 game for #Isles.
Handcuffed because they are already paying Rask starter money.You don't move on from talent like that, ever. They were handcuffed financially.
Get the fuck out, really?
The Boston Bruins only get a draft pick from the Islanders for Tim Thomas if he reports to them or any other team if NYI trade his rights.
You wish.The condition is for the year, not the pick itself. Islanders just gave a 2nd rounder for a cap hit.
You wish.
Handcuffed because they are already paying Rask starter money.
So, the Bruins probably won't get anything most likely.
It's still crazy that this trade is legal in a league that cared about cap circumvention this off season.