Cyan said:Heh, well sure. But ultimately it's because people will pay it.
But isn't collusion supposed to be illegal? It goes against the free market, because competitors should be trying to undercut the cost of their competitors to sway customers to their product. Since it is out of the free market, does "it's based entirely one what the market will bear" make sense anymore as a valid argument?
Enzark - what good does it do society to let parasitic entities such as banks exist when it can be done so much more efficiently and equally by the government? Isn't that why the US government holds the monopoly on US currency?