Children throw counterproductive tantrums all the time.I don't understand what Republicans have to gain from this. Obama already won his second term, and everyone paying more in taxes goes against their tax belief completely.
Eh, presidents get the blame for recessions, which is what would happen if republicans refused to extend the middle income tax cuts next year. I believe they'll extend them in January, early. Boehner will surely fuck around and send a bill to the floor that extends all the tax cuts, but he will eventually send the middle income tax cuts.
This has been one of the worst stunts in years, republicans look horrible right now. Most people are on Obama's side by a large margin, and he'll win if he holds steady. Alas I expect some bullshit cave tomorrow, but republicans will be too stupid to take it.
I don't understand what Republicans have to gain from this. Obama already won his second term, and everyone paying more in taxes goes against their tax belief completely.
A Casey County man says the life-sized mannequin in his front yard of President Obama holding a slice of watermelon was meant as a joke and not a racist display.
"The way I look at it, it's freedom of speech," said Danny Hafley. "I don't know how other people will take it."
Hafley bought the Obama mask on sale after Halloween and put up the display around the time of November's presidential election.
The mannequin, dressed in a grey suit, clip-on tie and blue-collared shirt, was originally standing in Hafley's yard but the homeowner decided it would look better near the road.
When asked the reason behind the watermelon, Hafley responded that he thought the figure "might get hungry standing out here."
The problem with the entire countries approach to drugs is that they treat it like a dirty crime instead of a internal issue that needs the help and guidance of friends, family and even your government. It's better for the individual, better for the community, better for the country. All statistics back this up and in general it's just a nicer thing to do: stigmatizing drug use has many detrimental effects on the person who is being stigmatized.
You have too much faith in Obama.
There is a disturbing trend of glorifying ignorant sluts recently. Between the tweets about the president during the football game interruption to the tweets about HW in the hospital to something trivial and stupid as this, it is curious why anyone gives these people any kind of attention instead of just ignoring them like we used to.
Hai guise.
My self-imposed GAF blackout is over. I miss this community too much. I just need to ignore the gaming side so I don't get myself in trouble.
edit:
I'll share some of my holiday family discussions. I had an uncle talking about the auto bailout, saying Chrysler is no longer an American company, Romney was right on not intervening, and the federal government is losing money on their shares of these companies they bought. I thought about jumping in, but I sat quietly and enjoyed the mourning.
My grandmother also spent a lot of time complaining about how Obama sometimes goes on vacations.
I'm confused by your use of sluts. Are we so certain of their gender or is there a reason to use a gendered term to describe both ignorant men and women?
I don't understand why he has to be THAT conciliatory. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad he's not stubborn and pig-headed like the far right in the GOP, but you've got to stand your ground sometimes. Bill Clinton did against far greater odds.
They get to vote against raising taxes, then, when the taxes go up, they get to vote to cut taxes, all of which plays better to the people who are going to vote for them in the primaries than going along with an Obama approved plan.I don't understand what Republicans have to gain from this. Obama already won his second term, and everyone paying more in taxes goes against their tax belief completely.
Though I did miss most of the Christmas Eve party hosted by my crazy uncle that went off the deep end after the election and hates me but doesn't hate me because I had to work, so who knows what was said there.
Seems your overlooking a core component of the pro-welfare drug testing argument in that none of these things you listed are illegal like drugs are. The argument is against subsidizing criminals, not people who choose not to take care of themselves.
Link?So scaled back deal being offered, 60-90 days. Such BS.
TPM
A bipartisan group of senators seeking to avoid a far-reaching filibuster reform proposal has presented Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) with a scaled-back version, according to the Huffington Post.
Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) said the plan will, as summarized by Huffington Post, "limit the use of the filibuster in some cases, such as on a motion to proceed to debate, and also include provisions allowing for amendments for the minority."
Democratic and Republican sources told TPM the results of the bipartisan negotiations will likely be shared with rank-and-file members during caucus lunches Friday.
Changing filibuster rules ordinarily requires a two-thirds majority. Reid has vowed to use the Constitutional option, if need be, and do so with a bare majority using a rare procedural tool early next month.
So scaled back deal being offered, 60-90 days. Such BS.
In addition, Republicans would be granted an extension of the current estate tax, which is a 35 percent rate over a $5 million threshold. The president wants a 45 percent rate on a $3.5 million threshold but would likely be willing to bend, in part because congressional Democrats are skittish about his proposal.
@BloombergNews FLASH: President's opening offer on tax cut said to be $250,000 in income
Why in fuck are Democrats skittish about this proposal? I don't get it. This is a good way to get some revenue on people who are literally rich and did nothing to get there.
I fully expect it to end up at $400k
I hope their contemplation takes more than four days.
So scaled back deal being offered, 60-90 days. Such BS.
Same here but I still believe they will get a deal done to avert the proverbial cliff.
So in 60-90 days we repeat this mess, if the reports are true. This makes no fucking sense. Victory is days away, yet Obama would rather snatch defeat from its jaws just so David Brooks can say some nice things about him. I say again: leadership matters.
This mere debate harms the economy, yet every 3 or 6 months we repeat it. At what point does the WH realize the recovery is slowly being strangled by this hostage taking, can kicking bullshit? Go over the cliff and do a prime time announcement demanding extension of the middle income cuts. Republicans will fold. They cannot vote to raise taxes, so going over the cliff gives them the chance to lower them.
I'd rather they give in on the top tax rate than this.Payroll tax extension isn't even being offered? That would piss me right the fuck off. If it happens because we're going over the cliff then so be it. If it happens because of some stupid deal that only accomplishes pushing a deadline down the road another couple months would just be pathetic.
I'd rather they give in on the top tax rate than this.
Payroll taxes are fucking stupid and need to be done with anyway.
Because Obama wants a big deal, and extending this "cliff" would give him another shot at it.What makes you believe that this whole 3 day push isn't a front by both parties?
Did he? He cut welfare, repealed glass-steagall, signed DOMA, signed DADT. Obama and Clinton are peas in a shitty liberal pod.
I don't love speculative history all that much, but I'm pretty damn sure Obama would've vetoed the '96 budget Newt put forward.Yes, he did things I don't agree with, but he did stand up to the GOP when they threatened to shut the gov't down. That gave him a huge victory over the GOP and bolstered his reelection campaign.
I don't love speculative history all that much, but I'm pretty damn sure Obama would've vetoed the '96 budget Newt put forward.
As it now stands, Clinton caved on bigger things than Obama.