According to some, I got money to attend college from government and so I deserve to die.Motherfucker!
According to some, I got money to attend college from government and so I deserve to die.Motherfucker!
One thing the crazies are right about is that tax hikes on the current payers won't cover the spread. The US needs more revenue all around.
It's rather irritating how the conversation isn't about stimulus vs cuts, but rather shitty cuts vs really shitty cuts. They keep this shit up, and the dems are going to get stuck with the label of being anti growth when republicans turn on a dime decide to start supporting all their special interest groups wanting to spend money to build tank factories instead of spending it on infrastructure.
The US doesn't need more revenue until its economy is at full employment. Until then, all of that unused labor represents fiscal space into which the government may safely spend.
It's not my fault I couldn't get a full time job at 12 that pays enough to live on and save up while also preparing for college!As a heroic industrialist, let me just say that I'd rather work on a farm the rest of my life than let a small part of my tax money help you go to college!
If by anti-bush you mean using military means properly, then sure.
How's the closing of Guantanamo going?
How many bankers were punished for destroying the global economy?
Why did Obama raid the monsato boards to hire the people who decide our good policy?
Where's the infrastructure stimulus?
How's the closing of Guantanamo going?
How many bankers were punished for destroying the global economy?
Why did Obama raid the monsato boards to hire the people who decide our good policy?
Where's the infrastructure stimulus?
Ask congress.
I didn't realize Congress hired the fda staff and ran the doj.
I didn't realize Congress hired the fda staff and ran the doj.
You lived through Bush's term. I lived through Bush's term. Hell, I'm pretty sure we all did. Let's not reduce it to such trite comparisons.How's the closing of Guantanamo going?
How many bankers were punished for destroying the global economy?
Why did Obama raid the monsato boards to hire the people who decide our good policy?
Where's the infrastructure stimulus?
Lording over us while wearing his crown of copper.We're still pretending Obama is a King?
You lived through Bush's term. I lived through Bush's term. Hell, I'm pretty sure we all did. Let's not reduce it to such trite comparisons.
Obama certainly disappoints in multiple ways, but the sheer level of incompetence and mendacity of the Bush Administration has yet to be even approached. Remember that it didn't even function as a policy-making organization.
I'm not talking about competence, I'm talking policy.
But w is still a touchy topic since he's so recent.
Let's look at this. Outside of modern social issues like gay marriage, Obama is to the right of bush sr on what he does. That's a fact.
This does not equate to additional terms for Bush 43. You want to talk policy? Bush wanted to privatize social security and his health plan was individual saving accounts. He started two wars when he only had the duty to wage one, while keeping the expenses outside the official budget. He started NCLB. He cut taxes to levels Obama fought to pull up from. His vice president declared himself unaccountable to anyone. He withheld funding to the EPA and put politics into general science funding.Let's look at this. Outside of modern social issues like gay marriage, Obama is to the right of bush sr on what he does. That's a fact.
President Barack Obamas approval rating in New York fell precipitously in the past month, according to a poll released Monday, and three-fifths of the states registered voters now believe the country is heading in the wrong direction.
Obamas approval rating remains high in New York, at 56 percent, with 41 percent disapproving, according to the Siena College poll.
But the presidents approval rating was at 66 percent last month, with only 32 percent disapproval so the change is a net 19 point decline.
Why is this an article.
How's the closing of Guantanamo going?
How many bankers were punished for destroying the global economy?
Why did Obama raid the monsato boards to hire the people who decide our good policy?
Where's the infrastructure stimulus?
Can we talk about copper shortages again?
.Why is this an article?
PhoenixDark said:Meanwhile on Politico
Obama is the worst king ever
We have to do something to overthrow his monarchy!
This does not equate to additional terms for Bush 43. You want to talk policy? Bush wanted to privatize social security and his health plan was individual saving accounts. He started two wars when he only had the duty to wage one, while keeping the expenses outside the official budget. He started NCLB. He cut taxes to levels Obama fought to pull up from. His vice president declared himself unaccountable to anyone. He withheld funding to the EPA and put politics into general science funding.
It goes on, and in no way does your anger about monsanto or guantanimo justify equating the two.
Can we talk about copper shortages again?
Bush said a lot of things, just like Obama says a lot of things.
On both ends they say things for their base they have no intention of following up on.
Look at high speed rail. Blame Congress? Not really. In 2009 they were proposing large sums of cash, Obama said no, lower it please, and so they did
Then once the house went gop Obama proposes 100bn knowing full well it wouldn't happen.
I doubt many of the far right bush proposals would have happened had he the opportunity. Remember, he too had both houses.
Why isn't this shit bannable?
if you have nothing productive to say, stop attempting
Da fuck? No, they wanted more money, but they couldn't get it past the dipshits calling for austerity as a response to the recession.
Short memory i see. Look at 2009 again, when both houses were dem.
Obama neutered the hsr program
Because the shit you bring up half the time doesn't call for productive conversation. Look at this page for instance.
I'm sorry I'm not obsessed with the 2016 election and want to discuss policy.
if you're not interested stop derailing the conversation and move elsewhere
Why isn't this shit bannable?
if you have nothing productive to say, stop attempting to derail the thread
Don't we allI just wanted to know more about the copper monopoly Obama is planning.
Say it with meMeanwhile on Politico
bad news?
oh wait
....
Why is this an article.
The bolded you can blame on Congress almost exclusively. Obama ordered Guantanamo closed but Congress refused to fund it/put them anywhere else while it was all sorted out.
Day one, actually.
He ordered it closed. Congress swiftly banned the use of any funds for closing the complex or transferring guantanamo bay prisoners to the civilian system.
It's literally illegal for federal prosecutors to put the people in guantanamo bay on trial, or for the facility to be closed. Trying to do so would get anyone involved felony charges. Obama would certainly be impeached and removed from office and face years behind bars.
Bush said a lot of things, just like Obama says a lot of things.
On both ends they say things for their base they have no intention of following up on.
Look at high speed rail. Blame Congress? Not really. In 2009 they were proposing large sums of cash, Obama said no, lower it please, and so they did
Then once the house went gop Obama proposes 100bn knowing full well it wouldn't happen.
I doubt many of the far right bush proposals would have happened had he the opportunity. Remember, he too had both houses.
A New York state judge on Monday threw out a ban on large sugary drinks set to go into effect in New York City on Tuesday, calling the new regulation “arbitrary and capricious.”
Championed by Mayor Michael Bloomberg as a way to fight the city's growing obesity epidemic, the new regulation was to limit the sale of sugary beverages including non-diet sodas, fruit drinks, sweetened teas and other high-calorie drinks to just 16 ounces.
But the American Beverage Association and other business groups representing bars, restaurants and bodegas had sued to stop the new law, arguing, in part, that it would create an uneven playing field for businesses.
In his ruling, New York Supreme Court Judge Milton Tingling agreed with that argument, calling the new regulation "fraught with arbitrary and capricious consequences.
"The simple reading of the rule leads to the earlier acknowledged uneven enforcement even within a particular city block, much less the city as a whole," Tingling said. "The loopholes in this rule effectively defeat the state purpose of the rule."
It's not my fault I couldn't get a full time job at 12 that pays enough to live on and save up while also preparing for college!
Those are all good points but it sounds like you were talking about Bush junior whereas he said Bush senior.This does not equate to additional terms for Bush 43. You want to talk policy? Bush wanted to privatize social security and his health plan was individual saving accounts. He started two wars when he only had the duty to wage one, while keeping the expenses outside the official budget. He started NCLB. He cut taxes to levels Obama fought to pull up from. His vice president declared himself unaccountable to anyone. He withheld funding to the EPA and put politics into general science funding.
It goes on, and in no way does your anger about monsanto or guantanimo justify equating the two.
Those are all good points but it sounds like you were talking about Bush junior whereas he said Bush senior.
But mentioning Bush senior is a bit irrelevant these days. His type have been run out of the GOP and replaced with Tea Partiers.
Also, Bush 41 had a good amount of good policies.
"I would argue against your premise that we lost this issue in the campaign," Ryan told Wallace. "We won the senior vote."
Breitbart.com ridiculed Paul Krugman for filing for Chapter 13 bankruptcy protection in a since-deleted post whose claims originated with a satire website. Just last month, Breitbart.com castigated a news outlet for running with a story from that same website.
In the March 11 post, Breitbart.com editor at large Larry O'Connor mocked the Nobel Prize winning economist and New York Times columnist for his alleged financial mismanagement. Unfortunately for O'Connor, the report that Krugman went bankrupt is clearly a joke and originated from the satirical website The Daily Currant. O'Connor has since deleted the post without explanation. (Update: O'Connor tweeted, saying he "trusted Boston.com as the source for that Krugman piece, but they were duped by Daily Currant, therefore, so was I!")
In his post, O'Connor jabbed Krugman for supposedly spending "$84,000 in one month" on Portuguese wines and "a dress from the Victorian period," and concluded that "apparently this Keynsian [sic] thing doesn't really work on the micro level." O'Connor sourced the report to a Boston.com post written by "Prudent Investor." The post by "Prudent Investor" sources an Austrian website, which reprinted the original Daily Currant story. (Update: Boston.com appears to have deleted the story.)
Tingling is one of the best names I've ever heard.
Should've taxed the drink instead.