Really? Yes, it's true that some higher income brackets got their taxes hiked but in exchange the Dems lost the estate tax, and the capital gains/dividends tax, permanently. The latter in particular are huge wins for the Republicans.
They didn't "lose" the estate tax. First off, Obama was seeking $3.5 million at 45% and got $5 million at 40% compared to the $5 million at 35%.
In 2009 at that same $3.5 mil and 45% number the US brought in roughly $20 billion. At the $5 mil number and 35% it was projected to bring in $12 billion. Now it will be between those two numbers, probably about $14 billion on average.
The Estate tax issue is a red herring. So little revenue is brought in from it at Obama's best case scenario, it wasn't really worth fighting hard over. Roughly $5 billion in revenues is not worth it. The Estate issue was a push.
Obama always seeked a 20% rate on capital gains. Only difference was instead of at $250k it starts at $450k, not a big deal. He gave back a bit on dividends but no one expected dividends to be at the actual income rate.
Making them permanent is a good thing, too. Non-permanent taxes are stupid (with the exception of temporary middle class tax cuts during downturns). If they have a time limit on them, it adversely affects behavior. It's why the Bush tax cuts performed even worse than they should have. You don't pass tax policy with an expiration date.
And they can always be changed at a moment's notice. Nothing is permanent.