Nash McCabe is an American hero.Hootie said:I remember I got banned for 3 days after that lady in one of the primary debates asked Obama if he believed in the American flag. I still can't believe she is/was that stupid.
XxenobladerxX said:http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_peyir6NMWXE/SOkwZsU-FbI/AAAAAAAAAG4/zNbx7vF3LVU/S1600-R/1005_mainchart.png[IMG][/QUOTE]
That's not the new one!
INDIANAPOLIS (WISH) - The race for president in Indiana is a dead heat according to the new WISH-TV Indiana Poll. The poll confirms that Indiana is a battleground state in part because two of the top three issues in the spring, health care and the war, gave way to bigger concerns at the moment.
The numbers are even: 46 percent for Barack Obama and 46 percent for John McCain. Three percent named another candidate and just five percent are undecided.
Hootie said:I remember I got banned for 3 days after that lady in one of the primary debates asked Obama if he believed in the American flag. I still can't believe she is/was that stupid.
electricpirate said:Those were the youtube debates though, they were supposed to be looser and dumber.
That does suck. I guess this is the format John McCain had in mind for those 10 town hall meetings he wanted?GhaleonEB said:Debate rule suck. Even less time for discussion than the past two.
Also, no follow-ups or audience reaction allowed.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/Belmont_ground_rules.html?showall
Hell yeah. Two men enter, one man leaves.The Blue Jihad said:Ugh. To hell with Town Halls.
I want Thunderdome.
kkaabboomm said:go indiana?
No, pretty sure that was from the last Obama/Clinton debate on ABC.electricpirate said:Those were the youtube debates though, they were supposed to be looser and dumber.
gcubed said:IMO, the rules that were posted for this debate, while are really good for Obama because basically, there is no way to screw up or "win big" with those rules, makes for a really REALLY boring debate.
electricpirate said:Those were the youtube debates though, they were supposed to be looser and dumber.
The Lamonster said:No, pretty sure that was from the last Obama/Clinton debate on ABC.
lexdysia said:Oh god. That seems so long ago.
GhaleonEB said:Debate rule suck. Even less time for discussion than the past two.
Also, no follow-ups or audience reaction allowed.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/Belmont_ground_rules.html?showall
kkaabboomm said:CBS Poll:
Obama 48, McCain 45
why so close?
kkaabboomm said:CBS Poll:
likely voters
Obama 48, McCain 45 (48-43 on 9/25)
registered voters
Obama 47, McCain 43 (47-42 on 9/25)
why getting closer?
sorry, i thought i'd bring it into this thread too...Stoney Mason said:I posted this in the prior thread. It's one poll of out a dozen others that show a larger lead. It's an outlier and not worth any discussion at this point until other polls confirm it or drift in that direction.
This definitely seems to favor McCain, as he can spew all the bullshit he wants.GhaleonEB said:Debate rule suck. Even less time for discussion than the past two.
Also, no follow-ups or audience reaction allowed.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/Belmont_ground_rules.html?showall
electricpirate said:I wasn't even following the race really back then, I kind of vaugly like Obama, and didn't like hildawg but that was about it.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/10/06/1502183.aspxartredis1980 said:wheres the WSJ/NBC poll
ElectricBlue187 said:28 Days seems like such a long time. I just know McCain is going to pull some shit out of his hat and ruin everything
The Iowa speech got me too. I cried.Tobor said:The Youtube debate was when my interest started. It was Obama's speech after the Iowa primary that sold me. It's hard to describe how that speech effected me.
That was, as my Father told me later, my "Kennedy" moment.
Trakdown said:He hasn't yet?
permutated said:So what time will it be airing in California?
czartim said:Any place where I can see some state by state polling? Like on one site?
ElectricBlue187 said:I almost feel like he's waiting till the last minute to break out some big Obama scandal
www.pollster.com and www.electoral-vote.com are both great.czartim said:Any place where I can see some state by state polling? Like on one site?
ElectricBlue187 said:28 Days seems like such a long time. I just know McCain is going to pull some shit out of his hat and ruin everything
worldrunover said:Here's an innocent question: If for some bizarre reason the race ends 269-269, but some Minnesotan moran votes for John Ewards again or something akin, or if that DC woman refuses to give her vote in protest, does this mean McCain wins? Or are we looking at months of legal battles?
worldrunover said:Here's an innocent question: If for some bizarre reason the race ends 269-269, but some Minnesotan moran votes for John Ewards again or something akin, or if that DC woman refuses to give her vote in protest, does this mean McCain wins? Or are we looking at months of legal battles?
(1) 2004 election: A Minnesota elector, pledged for Democrats John Kerry and John Edwards, cast his or her presidential vote for John Ewards [sic], apparently accidentally. (All of Minnesota's electors cast their vice presidential ballots for John Edwards.) Minnesota's electors cast secret ballots, so unless one of the electors claims responsibility, it is unlikely that the identity of the faithless elector will ever be known. As a result of this incident, Minnesota Statutes were amended to provide for public balloting of the electors' votes and invalidation of a vote cast for someone other than the candidate the elector is pledged to.