kkaabboomm
Member
so the fed cut their key rate by .5% this morning.
here's hoping for a + day in the market...
here's hoping for a + day in the market...
What do these rates do in the stock market? How does it affect the value of stocks?kkaabboomm said:so the fed cut their key rate by .5% this morning.
here's hoping for a + day in the market...
Its just a big pile of bullshit at this point.Dax01 said:What do these rates do in the stock market? How does it affect the value of stocks?
You would have more of a point if you tried to bring up Palin and GAF's overt misogyny. McCain flatly is out of touch.bishopcruz said:SO this is why I should stay the hell out of these threads, I was hoping for at least a little bit of level headed discussion without the McCain= out of touch/evil talk. I should have realized this was NeoGAF.
AniHawk said:That's because McCain was actually thinking about what he was going to say and Obama, like the robot he is, was just running off pre-scripted soundbites.
The rate the fed controls is what banks charge each other for overnight loans. It ultimately reduces the rate on all loans and it puts more money in the money supply. This makes stocks go up since companies will have more cash, but it also increases inflation since the supply of money goes up.Dax01 said:What do these rates do in the stock market? How does it affect the value of stocks?
Dax01 said:What do these rates do in the stock market? How does it affect the value of stocks?
Saint Gregory said:Why haven't I heard of Robert Gibbs before? First he shits on Hannity and then he shuts down Joe on MSNBC. I'm in love with this guy![]()
I wish....Desperado said:Is today November 4th??
bishopcruz said:SO this is why I should stay the hell out of these threads, I was hoping for at least a little bit of level headed discussion without the McCain= out of touch/evil talk. I should have realized this was NeoGAF.
SpeedingUptoStop said:I wish....
actually, no i don't, this will probably get worse for mccain.
Agreed. I definitely think McCain deserves an Oprah-style bashing for what he did :lolAniHawk said:I just want him to face Jon Stewart. No Daily Show segments, just 22 minutes of Stewart vs. McCain.
Apparently Franken's up in the polls now too. O'Reilly must be having a heart attack over this. :lolMightyHealthy said:After a few days of paying little attention to the Al Franken For Senate buzz, I just watched this ad, and
Agreed. I definitely think McCain deserves an Oprah-style bashing for what he did :lol
DenogginizerOS said:From FoxNews Comments section in the story asking, "Who won the debate?"
http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/10/07/debate1_1007/
john
October 8th, 2008 at 8:50 am
I use to not care at all i just voted for rebulbicans now i know that Mccaine is the one we need not a teroust like oboma
1. The debate was truly awful. The financial crisis was caused by greed (McCain) and deregulation (Obama). We need energy independence. Our priority is to do everything at once (McCain). We will cut spending by spending more (Obama). We can create jobs.
Let me ignore the rest, and focus on jobs. We can create jobs by getting rid of computers and going back to carbon paper for communication and paper and pencil for arithmetic. We can create jobs by getting rid of electric motors and going back to human power to run factories. As long as wants are unlimited, you don't need to create jobs.
If the candidates were out to correct economic ignorance instead of pandering to it, the debate would not resemble last night's in any way. There was no winner. Only losers.
It's like rednecks find new and exotic ways to spell things all the times.DenogginizerOS said:From FoxNews Comments section in the story asking, "Who won the debate?"
http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/10/07/debate1_1007/
john
October 8th, 2008 at 8:50 am
I use to not care at all i just voted for rebulbicans now i know that Mccaine is the one we need not a teroust like oboma
FF_VIII said:
It's easy to see why people want more than the norm.typhonsentra said:Apparently Franken's up in the polls now too. O'Reilly must be having a heart attack over this. :lol
Not when it comes to fact checking - no.eznark said:shouldn't reporters always be passive?
DenogginizerOS said:From FoxNews Comments section in the story asking, "Who won the debate?"
http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/20.../debate1_1007/
john
October 8th, 2008 at 8:50 am
I use to not care at all i just voted for rebulbicans now i know that Mccaine is the one we need not a teroust like oboma
I'm from the South, so I can explain their vernacular.Kipz said:It's like rednecks find new and exotic ways to spell things all the times.
Called it about a week ago.Cloudy said:LOL Foxnews pounding this ACORN thing into the ground. They even have guys on site in battleground states going through voter registrations. Give it a rest, you losers :lol
If any news organization is an authority on nuts, it is FoxNews.Cloudy said:LOL Foxnews pounding this ACORN thing into the ground. They even have guys on site in battleground states going through voter registrations. Give it a rest, you losers :lol
DenogginizerOS said:Not when it comes to fact checking - no.
eznark said:shouldn't reporters always be passive?
kkaabboomm said:it's a way to make capital easier to get, because the interest rate is lower. this hopefully means more people/companies will then get this money and use it to unfreeze credit markets. quite a complex undertaking, but right now no one is lending money to anyone else, and most companies rely on short term loans to meet payroll/etc while income is slated to come in a short time later. lowering this rate hopefully allows them access to money and thus they dont have to fire people/not make payroll/etc/etc
electricpirate said:Is that a response to something or, is it just a general argument?
If a general argument, uhh no. Fact checking, and verifying are pretty important. Bush sailed through 2 elections thanks to a media that was passive, and reported things as "He said she said." Instead of pulling hte facts in. See, Al Gore invented the invented the internet, see Bushes' tax claims, see swift boat attacks.
A passive media and we might as well be reading press releases.
Doesn't that devalue the dollar?
Cloudy said:LOL Foxnews pounding this ACORN thing into the ground. They even have guys on site in battleground states going through voter registrations. Give it a rest, you losers :lol
eznark said:agreed, however presentation should still remain passive
Solaros said:Called it about a week ago.
MightyHealthy said:It's easy to see why people want more than the norm.
The Crimson Blur said:If the media always shows the Blitzer cold eyes of impartiality, the public can be lulled into accepting outrageous activities.
Use alarmism when it is appropriate. Lies need to be called out for what they are. America could use a media who is more shocked by bold-faced lies than vague connections with a reformed 60s terrorist.
MightyHealthy said:I'm from the South, so I can explain their vernacular.
In this instance, mccaine is slang for hopium.
FF_VIII said:
lexdysia said:Wow. Cool Oblivion character.
God, the nightmares.FF_VIII said:
Barack Obama attracting 51% of the vote while John McCain earns 45%. For the past thirteen days, Obamas support has ranged from 50% to 52% while McCain has been at 44% of 45% every day
Cloudy said:New Rassmussen
Aww I wish it would stay at +8Cloudy said:New Rassmussen
eznark said:I think that is really going to open up next week