SpeedingUptoStop
will totally Facebook friend you! *giggle* *LOL*
....isn't this closer to what Obama wanted, rather than McCain?UltimaKilo said:Plus Iraq is becoming a non-issue seeing how it's practically set in stone we'll be out by 2012.
....isn't this closer to what Obama wanted, rather than McCain?UltimaKilo said:Plus Iraq is becoming a non-issue seeing how it's practically set in stone we'll be out by 2012.
Slurpy said:The hell?
Anyway, Holy fuck at this raging republican woman on CNN.
'She has infinitely more experience than Obama has'
' Obama has zip, zilch, Nada'
'Foreign policy experience? She has a son in Iraq'
'She is absolutely ready to be President'
There's nothing more entertaining than seeing these shills make complete idiots of themselves over the next couple months, by being forced to spout this BS.
scorcho said:Palin on Iraq, or energy independence, or something -
http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/08/palin_on_iraq.php
policy wonks everywhere are captivated by her grasp on the issue. whatever that issue may be.
truth be told, most of what you've written in these threads have been elementary. i do like the 'i've volunteered for both campaigns so i know a lot' angle as a way to augment your detailed knowledge of soundbite punditry though.UltimaKilo said:I'm using a stupid argument against another, that's all.
SEGA SAMMY said:Funny the media is playing the when McCain dies she will not be ready for foreign policy spin....With the Dems, no one has to die for us to be unprepared to deal with foreign policy!!
Hitokage said:No, Obama's stance is that the surge hasn't accomplished what it was supposed to do in the first place: accomplish political progress in Iraq. Reducing violence is only a means to that end.
http://www.236.com/video/2008/get_your_war_on_the_surge_8423.phpUltimaKilo said:Ah yes, only Obama can use that excuse. Then McCain will say "Obama was wrong about the surge and won't admit it worked" while as always, Obama will have no answer. Plus Iraq is becoming a non-issue seeing how it's practically set in stone we'll be out by 2012. Oh, and wasn't Biden wrong about Iraq?!!! Guess he doesn't have the judgment to be VP! Wait... but Obama picked him so does that mean Obama has no judgment or experience?! :lol
grandjedi6 said:I didn't say how far above
mj1108 said:I'm sorry but this pair doesn't seem "Presidential" in any sense.
![]()
It looks more like she's either his daughter or she's a golddigger dating a millionaire.
This decision is only political to try to woo women voters still upset over Hillary.
Talk about a clusterfuck of a decision....
Yes, but many of those polar bears are from Canada. :lolthekad said:She's been too busy with polar bears or something.Suikoguy said:Does Palin even have a Foreign Policy opinion yet?
I don't like executive abuse of power either, but if the mitigating circumstances turn out to be true (beating her sister, tasering his own kid and threatening to murder the family), it's going to be hard to paint her in a bad light for doing what the cops should have done immediately.besada said:Since laserbeam can't be tasked to answer honestly...
She's under investigation for a wrongful firing that may or may not involve abuse of her powers. No strong evidence has turned up, and the investigation is ongoing.
Amir0x said:Not yet - I'll warm up to him a little better if he can manage to avoid the fucking grand canyon sized gaffe potential that lies in him attack dogging Palin. Remind me again after the debates.
I'm never going to really warm up to him completely due to our differences, but that'd be a start.
scorcho said:truth be told, most of what you've written in these threads have been elementary. i do like the 'i've volunteered for both campaigns so i know a lot' angle as a way to augment your detailed knowledge of soundbite punditry though.
This Monday I think.DancingJesus said:Two of his daughters are older than her.
Anywho when does the convention begin?
UltimaKilo said:Ah yes, only Obama can use that excuse. Then McCain will say "Obama was wrong about the surge and won't admit it worked" while as always, Obama will have no answer.
Plus Iraq is becoming a non-issue seeing how it's practically set in stone we'll be out by 2012. Oh, and wasn't Biden wrong about Iraq?!!! Guess he doesn't have the judgment to be VP! Wait... but Obama picked him so does that mean Obama has no judgment or experience?! :lol
I dont think its a short resume. She first ran for office back in 1992. I dont know what Senator Obama was doing then, but the first time she ran was 1992. Thats 16 years. I think thats a pretty, pretty event-filled and record-filled resume. -- McCain
adamsappel said:I don't like executive abuse of power either, but if the mitigating circumstances turn out to be true (beating her sister, tasering his own kid and threatening to murder the family), it's going to be hard to paint her in a bad light for doing what the cops should have done immediately.
Oh McCain...grandjedi6 said:http://thepage.time.com/the-palins-and-mccains-talk-with-people-magazine/
Hard to swallow that logic, hmm
scorcho said:truth be told, most of what you've written in these threads have been elementary. i do like the 'i've volunteered for both campaigns so i know a lot' angle as a way to augment your detailed knowledge of soundbite punditry though.
grandjedi6 said:http://thepage.time.com/the-palins-and-mccains-talk-with-people-magazine/
Hard to swallow that logic, hmm
scorcho said:policy wonks everywhere are captivated by her grasp on the issue. whatever that issue may be.
grandjedi6 said:http://thepage.time.com/the-palins-and-mccains-talk-with-people-magazine/
Hard to swallow that logic, hmm
Gov. Palin, who is still nursing her son, tells PEOPLE shes used to multi-tasking: What Ive had to do, though, is in the middle of the night, put down the Blackberries and pick up the breast pump. Do a couple of things different and still get it all done.
scorcho said:Palin on Iraq, or energy independence, or something -
http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/08/palin_on_iraq.php
policy wonks everywhere are captivated by her grasp on the issue. whatever that issue may be.
Oh . . . OK, I guess we'll never hear you mention Ayers, Rezko, etc. ever again. :lollaserbeam said:I answered honestly. Officially there has been no evidence of wrong doing and until a time where wrong doing is found she is innocent.
SEGA SAMMY said:McCain and Palin represent Fiscal reformers. I don't see Biden embracing small government and reforming Washington. The Iraq war is far under 3% of spending, where as the bloated social spending is at 55% of total spending. It would be more fiscally plausible to see the small government REP ticket would handle the 55% more aggressively.
SEGA SAMMY said:McCain and Palin represent Fiscal reformers. I don't see Biden embracing small government and reforming Washington. The Iraq war is far under 3% of spending, where as the bloated social spending is at 55% of total spending. It would be more fiscally plausible to see the small government REP ticket would handle the 55% more aggressively.
SEGA SAMMY said:McCain and Palin represent Fiscal reformers. I don't see Biden embracing small government and reforming Washington. The Iraq war is far under 3% of spending, where as the bloated social spending is at 55% of total spending. It would be more fiscally plausible to see the small government REP ticket would handle the 55% more aggressively.
scorcho said:to say that the surge is the only or even the biggest factor at reducing the violence in Iraq is also giving way to little credit to the awakening/SoI (something which i was and still am very skeptical about).
It is honest in GOP world where they found WMDs, Saddam was related 9/11, and Democrats are the fiscally irresponsible ones. :lolbesada said:No, you didn't. You didn't mention that she was under investigation at all, but instead deflected the question by talking about her policy regarding oil companies. If you think that's honest, we have different definitions of the word.
grandjedi6 said:http://thepage.time.com/the-palins-and-mccains-talk-with-people-magazine/
Hard to swallow that logic, hmm
thekad said:Obama has continuously answered that the surge along with many other factors resulted in a reduction of violence in Iraq. Whether the end result would be any different without the surge is up for debate. It's not as simple as "the surge worked."
Except Biden would not have gone to Iraq knowing what he knows now. McCain would.
Would you?
I saw your wiki link about the story on the last page. It seems a little more complicated than I thought, and the dismissal of sexual harassment allegations might hurt her with women voters as well.besada said:I agree. I just don't think a reasonable answer to someone asking about the situation is to pretend it doesn't exist.
Dax01 said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHaKrC8K84A
^^Obama announces his candidacy for the White House back in Feb 10 '07. Haven't seen it before, so that's why I'm watching it.
Outside of saying the Ayers ad would be effective with certain subsets of people I have spoken of those people never.speculawyer said:Oh . . . OK, I guess we'll never hear you mention Ayers, Rezko, etc. ever again. :lol
I personally feel there is no point in hammering someone with charges of wrong doing when there exists no such evidence at this point. Thats trying to get people assume she is guilty.speculawyer said:It is honest in GOP world where they found WMDs, Saddam was related 9/11, and Democrats are the fiscally irresponsible ones. :lol
SEGA SAMMY said:McCain and Palin represent Fiscal reformers. I don't see Biden embracing small government and reforming Washington. The Iraq war is far under 3% of spending, where as the bloated social spending is at 55% of total spending. It would be more fiscally plausible to see the small government REP ticket would handle the 55% more aggressively.
SEGA SAMMY said:McCain and Palin represent Fiscal reformers. I don't see Biden embracing small government and reforming Washington. The Iraq war is far under 3% of spending, where as the bloated social spending is at 55% of total spending. It would be more fiscally plausible to see the small government REP ticket would handle the 55% more aggressively.
maybe i can persuade by speaking to you in the parlance of our times - 'he's not change, just more of the same!'UltimaKilo said:Or like relio and some others, they try to paint you a certain way. Oh kind of like McCain is Bush's 3rd term.
EDIT: I meant scorcho, not relio. Sorry!
Stoney Mason said:Speaking of interviews did anyone catch this beauty yesterday.
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1836909,00.html
UltimaKilo said:I'm not making that argument, it was in jest to point out the ridiculous argument on the other side with experience. The thing is that partisan people are so blinded by their candidate that they don't see the good of the other or the bad of their own. Any argument you try to bring up, is quickly shot down because their candidate is superhuman, never wrong.
Or like relio and some others, they try to paint you a certain way. Oh kind of like McCain is Bush's 3rd term.
EDIT: I meant scorcho, not relio. Sorry!
grandjedi6 said:God damn. It's like he's being held at gunpoint or secretly a robot replacement