Gallup said:The latest results include interviews from Tuesday through Thursday night, though most of the interviewing was conducted before Obama's acceptance speech late Thursday.
The bounce is from the speakers, both Clinton's.
Gallup said:The latest results include interviews from Tuesday through Thursday night, though most of the interviewing was conducted before Obama's acceptance speech late Thursday.
It does not, but the numbers today will be in line with yesterdays. Besides you can't simply look at a tracking poll to gauge the possibly effect of the final night. It's not just about convincing undecideds, but also about making current, but weak, supporters more comfortable with their pick.v1cious said:http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/080829DailyUpdateGraph1_tyghnbv.gif
WTF
this... can't include yesterday, right? it's just not possible
Mumei said:<_<
August 29, 2008
Of course not.
PhoenixDark said::lol
Brilliant judgment McCain. I'd imagine they'll be doing as much covering up as investigating. Kicking your VP off the ticket would be a disaster
What are you talking about? He's 8 points ahead.v1cious said:![]()
WTF
this... can't include yesterday, right? it's just not possible
v1cious said:![]()
WTF
this... can't include yesterday, right? it's just not possible
Odrion said:annnnnnnnd the democrats fuck up and release a shitty ad: http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1185304443?bctid=1761990756
Zeliard said:No, but they certainly are higher now than they were on, say, Thursday morning, when you look at Obama's speech that night and the Palin choice.
Tyrone Slothrop said:i dunno... the Palin choice plus the RNC is going to give mccain a very significant bump. they're alot more energized, despite a historic speech a few days prior
BenjaminBirdie said:I don't see how a whole day's news cycle of LOLWUT is going to help him immensely. As has been said several times, the base he's energizing is smaller than the base the Democrats just did.
The caveat about this pick is not only Palin's experience, it's also a test of McCain's judgment.Mumei said:Why, why, why do people attempt to equate their experience?
I agree that both Obama and Palin are relatively inexperienced if you compare the number of years either has been in politics; the problem is that I can forgive Obama for that because I know he's bloody brilliant (you don't become the editor of HLR and graduate magna cum laude from Harvard Law if you are dimwitted, after all), I've seen him day in and day out for nearly two years show a firm grasp of the issues, and I've seen him make claims on foreign policy for months that he is eventually vindicated on - and not because he got lucky, but because he could explain why the position he had taken was the first one.
Palin could well be bloody brilliant herself for all I know; perhaps the ditzy, "What is it that the Vice President actually does everyday?" routine is just that, and she actually has a firm grasp of issues unrelated to evolution, global warming, and foreign policy.
But I doubt it.
He could have chosen someone like Rob Portman or Meg Whitman. Perhaps vetting ruled them out, but Mccain wasn't that far behind in polls to force him to make a pick like this.Branduil said:People are still analyzing the pick as if McCain had a chance choosing a normal VP.
it's a three day rolling average and was before the news of McCain's VP.Mumei said:<_<
August 29, 2008
Of course not.
Odrion said:annnnnnnnd the democrats fuck up and release a shitty ad: http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1185304443?bctid=1761990756
Nothing wrong with the ad and it's only running on "national cable" which usually means it's barely a real ad. Right now there's no point in attacking Palin directly. Let the surrogates and pundits raise concerns.Odrion said:annnnnnnnd the democrats fuck up and release a shitty ad: http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1185304443?bctid=1761990756
Branduil said:People are still analyzing the pick as if McCain had a chance choosing a normal VP.
quadriplegicjon said:yesterday had the whole VP thing dominating the airways. i called it earlier. the media was pushing that instead of the speech.
PhoenixDark said:That poll concluded on teh 28th, and was released on the 29th (yesterday). It doesn't include any effects the Obama speech had. Amir0x said a new one is coming out later today
Odrion said:annnnnnnnd the democrats fuck up and release a shitty ad: http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1185304443?bctid=1761990756
DeaconKnowledge said:On another point entirely, I think the Palin pick will backfire even for the means it was intended: women voters.
I think most women are going to shy away from Palin because of her lack of experience; they don't want the first woman in office to be a complete disaster.
Mumei said:![]()
Heh.
Women are more skeptical of Palin than men.![]()
hey, she really is putting the country first.Tamanon said:Plus there seems to be some backlash already building over her being on the campaign trail with a 5 month old.
Mumei said:![]()
Heh.
Women are more skeptical of Palin than men.![]()
Like most viewing this site, I do have a number of thoughts regarding this incredible VP selection, but really only one is worthy of print: thank god John McCain finally selected an individual worthy of competing with Cindy McCain for the title of Miss Buffalo Chip.
Agent Icebeezy said:Obama picked someone that would make him a better president
McCain picked someone that would make him a better candidate
I'm sure people said the same thing about slavery.adamsappel said:Roe v. Wade might get overturned, but abortion itself is never going to be banned nationally.
where did that come from?Mumei said:![]()
Heh.
Women are more skeptical of Palin than men.![]()
Where is this from?Mumei said:![]()
Heh.
Women are more skeptical of Palin than men.![]()
Branduil said:I'm sure people said the same thing about slavery.
numble said:Where is this from?
adamsappel said:The video of Karl Rove dismissing Tim Kaine as a lightweight, inexperienced choice (which I don't disagree with) is a gold mine. Has he made one of those hypocritical about-faces to praise her to the heavens? Nothing wrong with talking up the positive side of her (unsullied by DC, pro-life, pro-NRA, popular with constituents, corruption-buster), but to use proximity to the Bering Straight and PTA duties as examples of political experience is laughable. ObamaGAF readily acknowledges the fact that Biden needs to shut his big, fat mouth lest he trip up their chances, and yet RepubliGAF refuses to even question Palin's credentials. Talk about a cult mindset.
With 49% of the vote, Obama has tied his high for the campaign to date. (To view the complete trend since March 7, 2008, click here.) He has received a boost in the polls coming out of the Democratic Party's convention this week, at which he became the first African-American to be nominated as the presidential candidate of a major political party.
The current results are based on Aug. 27-29 interviewing, which includes two nights of polling during the convention and one post-convention night on Friday. The Friday interviewing was conducted in an unusual political environment -- the first conducted fully after Obama's well-regarded acceptance speech and McCain's surprise announcement of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his vice presidential running mate. Each event in isolation has usually been associated with increased candidate support for the relevant party. On this day -- with strong partisan forces pushing the public in both directions -- Obama still polled better than he had been prior to the convention, but not as well as he was polling on the individual nights of the convention.
Now the focus shifts to the Republican convention in St. Paul, Minn., beginning Monday, and McCain hopes for a bounce similar to what Obama has enjoyed the past few days. -- Jeff Jones
Branduil said:I'm sure people said the same thing about slavery.
bob_arctor said:On the latter, I suppose she's the Holly Homemaker to his Old Man Yells At Cloud. Even then, I still don't see how this makes him a better candidate.
You're right, that's not quite fair. Most slave-owners didn't kill their slaves.Crayon Shinchan said:Wait. Did you just equate slavery with pro-choice?
Branduil said:You're right, that's not quite fair. Most slave-owners didn't kill their slaves.
It's going to drop, but if Mccain can't get ahead there's a reason to consider the convention a success.MaddenNFL64 said:I think Obama locked up a big chunk of fence sitters. I don't think that 49 is going to move too much. Maybe drop a bit after the RNC, but not by much.