johnsmith said:Nope, Palin has pretty much the exact same views. Only difference is Palin has a vagina.
Agent Icebeezy said:
Agent Icebeezy said:
rhfb said:The funny thing is with all this stuff now, and how secure the election seems for Obama.. if he were to lose I'd have to go get a gallon tub of popcorn and watch the tears flow on basically all of the internet (digg and gaf the most though!)
Actually, now I fully understand why the McCain campaign had to get this info out ASAP in face of that (false) rumor.v1cious said:.http://boards.msn.com/MSNBCboards/thread.aspx?threadid=766338&boardsparam=Page%3d1You piece of human scum. Pick the time and date. I will kick your a$$. You are despicable.
There is one indisputable factSarah Palin gave life to a baby boy who has Downs Syndrome. And you dare to suggest that this was an illegitimate birth by her daughter.
You have no sense of decency or honor. You deserve to be beaten in every manner conceivable. You and your cohorts spread this vicious lie. You are a spineless coward.
There is only one truth. Sarah Palins Downs Syndrome baby has more humanity and intelligence than you will ever achieve in your pathetic life. You are a synonym for a$$hole.
I will fight you with one arm tied behind my back and destroy you. Please, accept the challenge. Make my day.
:lol :lol
rhfb said:The funny thing is with all this stuff now, and how secure the election seems for Obama.. if he were to lose I'd have to go get a gallon tub of popcorn and watch the tears flow on basically all of the internet (digg and gaf the most though!)
Agent Icebeezy said:
Onix said:Exactly what is wrong with the AIP thing? She didn't seem to say anything wrong; sounded like a typical BS address a governor would give for a major group in her state?
Or is she an active member?
Lemonz said:Watch the rerun of Larry King tonight.
She was a member in the 90's along with her husband. She left and joined the republican party when she ran for mayor.Onix said:Exactly what is wrong with the AIP thing? She didn't seem to say anything wrong; sounded like a typical BS address a governor would give for a major group in her state?
Or is she an active member?
Onix said:Exactly what is wrong with the AIP thing? She didn't seem to say anything wrong; sounded like a typical BS address a governor would give for a major group in her state?
Or is she an active member?
that she was a member for two years in the 1990s of the Alaska Independence Party, which has at times sought a vote on whether the state should secede;
WickedAngel said:If the Democrats lose this time, what can possibly be done to win?
WickedAngel said:If the Democrats lose this time, what can possibly be done to win?
johnsmith said:Nominate someone white. Sad, but true.
johnsmith said:Nominate someone white. Sad, but true.
is there a link? too lazy.Gaborn said:NYT story that was posted earlier.
johnsmith said:Nominate someone white. Sad, but true.
johnsmith said:Nominate someone white. Sad, but true.
I'm sure Huck would love them too.frankthurk said:To be fair, she also likes mooseburgers.
Gaborn said:Because the only way Obama could possibly lose is racism, right? Geez, that's a little bit ridiculous.
Shiggie http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/02/us...l?ref=politics
And that's one of the Times' front page story.Tobor said:To the point and brutal. They got the freshness, alright.
Tobor said:In a year when we have an incredibly unpopular war and a hosed economy, yes.
Slurpy said:You know, everytime I start feeling sorry for the GOP, I remind myself of all their transgressions, their infinite lies and bullshit, their never-ending smears, hypocrisy, callous fear mongering, discrimination, and how they've taken the US into the shitter, as well as countries abroad, unapologetically. The feeling then dissipates instantly. Palin may not deserve this. But her party sure as hell does, and she had a choice of whether she wanted to put herself in this position.
Trakdown said:And the hits keep coming! Remember how McCain wanted to suspend Convention activity until the storm blew over?
The RNC didn't listen. Again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rni6G7RRFkk
GhaleonEB said:And that's one of the Times' front page story.
How does the McCain camp steer this? If these stories had come out one at a time over the course of the campaign it would be ugly but they could spin them off. This is a tsunami (hurricane?). Where do you even start tomorrow morning?
Slurpy said:You know, everytime I start feeling sorry for the GOP, I remind myself of all their transgressions, their infinite lies and bullshit, their never-ending smears, hypocrisy, callous fear mongering, discrimination, and how they've taken the US into the shitter, as well as countries abroad, unapologetically. The feeling then dissipates instantly. Palin may not deserve this. But her party sure as hell does, and she had a choice of whether she wanted to put herself in this position.
Oh, and can someone start a compilation of youtube videos of Mccain reps/GOP strategists getting owned when these become available? It feels like Im missing a hell of alot.
GhaleonEB said:How does the McCain camp steer this? If these stories had come out one at a time over the course of the campaign it would be ugly but they could spin them off. This is a tsunami (hurricane?). Where do you even start tomorrow morning?
Gaborn said:Calling opponents of Obama racist should be a bannable offense imo. (at least without evidence they're actually racist)
Tobor said:They would have at least done some internal polling before the pick, right? I'd love to see those numbers, but it's looking like McCain flipped a coin at this point.
I can't remember where it was, but I read a rumor last week that McCain picked Palin after Hillary and Bill's speech focus tested extremely well, indicating the democrats were rallying behind Obama. McCain's convention strategy of wedging Clinton and Obama supporters wasn't working, so he essentially doubled down on it by picking a woman.Tobor said:They would have at least done some internal polling before the pick, right? I'd love to see those numbers, but it's looking like McCain flipped a coin at this point.
Stoney Mason said:Blanket calling people not voting for Obama racist. Yes. Observing that a white man has historically had a much better shot of being elected. Nope.
Gaborn said:Calling opponents of Obama racist should be a bannable offense imo. (at least without evidence they're actually racist)
Gaborn said:That's true. Still, if Obama loses this campaign I don't believe it'll be because of racism and I think it puts quite a chill on the process to hint that Obama could lose because of a tiny percentage of racists, it just has too much of a negative implication on people who have honest ideological disagreements with the man.
Frank the Great said:All they have to do is pick the story least damaging and decide to release a statement on it in the morning. That will make that story the headline for a day or two, unless the Dems are really persistent with all these scandals.
Frank the Great said:
Gaborn said:That's true. Still, if Obama loses this campaign I don't believe it'll be because of racism and I think it puts quite a chill on the process to hint that Obama could lose because of a tiny percentage of racists, it just has too much of a negative implication on people who have honest ideological disagreements with the man.
Serious question: Do you feel other black members of Politi-GAF are accurate in their assessment of race playing a role?
I do but in a more nuanced way and not exactly to the degree that some of them do. I do believe that if Obama was a random white guy from random town USA with his oratorical skills and his compelling story and message he would be up more. But it's also unfair to just make blanket statements that people who aren't voting for Obama are racist.
People will always have a tendency to vote for people like them. However we perceive that. People who look at John Mccain and have led that sort of life and walked in those sorts of shoes naturally have an inclination towards that. Same with Barrack Obama and same with Hillary and same with whoever. It's silly to pretend that these social groups don't exist. My mother is voting for Barrack I'm certain partially because her life experience tells her that Barrack understands the life and struggles she has led because he is black. She doesn't communicate that verbally and she would never say that but I know it exists and it exists within everybody so I'm sure that it has to exist within the minds of white people in this country because they grew up in the same society I did.
Where it gets tricky is nobody black or white wants to admit this because we are all a little bit ashamed of it and think we should be beyond it but we aren't. So we demonize groups that we think are guilty of voting in this manner because it's something we want to beyond but aren't. It's just a slow evolution and it takes time. I think some white people aren't voting for Obama A) because he is black but I think some aren't voting for him because B.) he doesn't represent their life experience or world view which is different from being racist. And then some aren't voting for him C.) simply because they disagree with him on the issues. I'm not smart enough to say which percentage is in each category but I think everybody wants a society where it's the C case but we are human and it will take a long time to get everbody there but we are progressing.
When I talk to black people around me, there is a large contingent that think no way he will win even though they support him greatly. And it's funny because probably it's not PC but I rarely hear this narrative on TV but you hear it in the black community all the time that the "white people" won't let him win. Even when he was winning in large white states in the primary with overwhelmingly white populations (which was even surprising to me) there was this constant theme of they won't let him win the nomination which has now become they won't let him win the presidency. I think that's wrong. I think it's a outdated mode of thinking. I think it says something about how far we've come that a black guy (whether he's bi-racial or not) can get this far. This isn't 1950's Selma and black people should stop talking like it is. We still have a long way to go but the excuse of the white man holding people down has gone the way of the dodo for a majority of Americans I believe, not that prejudice as a general concept doesn't still exist especially in certain regions of the country.
reilo said:Uhm, why is John McCain blurred out in that picture, but in the original he is in focus?
![]()
Her name is Bristol. and she is HOT. Ive been with girls before, but I think this is the one. what do you think?
god, I fucking hate math. Why do they make this shit so complicated. sorry for cussing but this is stupid. Why on earth would I ever need to know x and y and all that. Im going to be a hockey player. I dont need the quadratic equation tyvm. Bristol knows math though, thank good. She helps me with it. Hopefully I can just pass this class and get on with it.
reilo said:Uhm, why is John McCain blurred out in that picture, but in the original he is in focus?
Tobor said:I'm not calling anyone in particular a racist, but to deny the undertones are there is naive.
Realistically, a bad war and a bad economy means a change in power. There is almost no way to fight that inevitably, so if it doesn't happen, something else is going on.
reilo said:Uhm, why is John McCain blurred out in that picture, but in the original he is in focus?
![]()
Gaborn said:Well, it could be that people perceive Obama's age as a problem, I'm not sure it is but you can't ignore that it might sway some people that are undecided's votes. You also have to figure between 35-40% on each side are already guaranteed to vote. Also Obama's got a large following among a variety of demographics, but some of his most vocal supporters are younger college age students who historically have been spotty in their turnout. If Obama gets a bump there it should be much easier for him, but that's not a guarantee, historically the youth vote promises to turn out and rarely does enough to offset the elderly vote (as an example).
That's of course ignoring all the events that haven't occurred yet that could swing the election one way or another. Obama should probably be considered the favorite today but it's by no means certain he'll win and there's still lots of times for events to affect both sides.