West Texas CEO
GAF's Nicest Lunch Thief and Nosiest Dildo Archeologist
As long as it has an XCX port, I couldn't care less what its called.
for us nerds, but for the normies, that are used to numeric succesors for devices (they now the next iphone will be named iphone n+1), Super Switch could be confusing and be not clear if it's a next iteration of a new revision like the oled. Nintendo cannot allow itself another WiiU fiasco.Super Nintendo Switch would be a better choice.
Or the Nintendo Series S based on what I’m expecting from the specs."Nintendo Switch Series X"
How is it the same? Numerical progression is a great idea with the "Switch" brand since it's just as popular a brand name as "PlayStation". "Wii U" was an extension of an already bad name with "U" confusing people.I dont think thats the case but if its true then Nintendo is going make same mistake they did with WiiU.
How is it the same? Numerical progression is a great idea with the "Switch" brand since it's just as popular a brand name as "PlayStation". "Wii U" was an extension of an already bad name with "U" confusing people.
They haven’t. Just having a “2” is by far the most unlikely scenario for the next Switch, at least imo.I would prefer Super Switch. I don't know if Nintendo ever had any "2" on any of their past consoles.
The haven’t. Just having a “2” is by far the most unlikely scenario for the next Switch, at least imo.
Who knows. Or maybe they’ll go for an iterative scheme this time. But I wouldn’t bet on it.Perhaps someone misread it and "2" is actually "S".
So could be Nintendo Switch S, where S is for Super.
Yeah. And like guessing the NES successor would be called “NES 2”, the GB successor “GB 2”, the Wii successor “Wii 2”, the DS successor “DS 2”..That’s like guessing that the next Playstation will be called the Playstation 6
and we couldn't be happier. First time in a while they will focus on graphical capabilities and I bet their games will look amazing. We will see a leap in quality.It true, this is the most boring/safe console Nintendo could make.
How exactly is this going to happen with 400$ a mobile device ?First time in a while they will focus on graphical capabilities
Steam Deck can already play many current generation games and the Switch 2 has the potential to be more powerful.How exactly is this going to happen with 400$ a mobile device ?
The Steam Deck is 400$ ? Nintendo will never make a brick like this either.Steam Deck can already play many current generation games and the Switch 2 has the potential to be more powerful.
The base model is $399. And the Switch 2's GPU is much wider than Steam Deck's, such that it should be about 1.8x faster on the same TDP and process. So that gives them room to hit lower TDPs while still being faster. Or at least deliver the same performance in a much smaller package.The Steam Deck is 400$ ? Nintendo will never make a brick like this either.
Super Nintendo Switch would be a better choice.
hopefully 1.8x longer battery life than Steam DeckThe base model is $399. And the Switch 2's GPU is much wider than Steam Deck's, such that it should be about 1.8x faster on the same TDP and process. So that gives them room to hit lower TDPs while still being faster. Or at least deliver the same performance in a much smaller package.
This could be another Wii moment imo, if they pull off a fun gimmick.Still nothing like when Wii became part of our vernacular
Or the Nintendo Series S based on what I’m expecting from the specs.