yurinka
Member
I FEEL THE NEED… THE NEED for Top Gun on PS6
I FEEL THE NEED… THE NEED for Top Gun on PS6
Rise of the Ronin was discount Ghost of Tsushima. This could be discount Red DeadWould I play a Yellowstone videogame?... Yeah, maybe. lol
I think they'd mainly be swooping in for IP for gaming and movies.Basically all of Paramount is a sinking ship. But Apollo and Sony are doing the vulture bites looking to swoop in and buy for cheap in hopes of turning it around.
Paramount Global Sees $1 Billion Charge in Q1 for Layoffs and Programming Write Offs
Paramount Global saw a business downturn in both its TV and film units even as it worked to stem losses in streamingvariety.com
Please stop making this PlayStation-related, SIE would have already made a SpongeBob game if they wanted to; not only this changes nothing, but they would also have to pay SPE for the license rights. They don't get this stuff for free.
The interesting one would be Indiana JonesThey'd have to make an agreement for licensing rights, that doesn't mean they'd have to pay for them.
PlayStation Productions has almost exclusively work with Sony Pictures where they could probably make more money farming out IP to various studios.
They clearly have a mandate from Sony Group to play nice.
Do you think Sony Pictures paid Insomniac to feature Marvel's Spider-Man 2 in Spider-Man Across the Spider-Verse? Or that Insomniac paid for licensing to use the Raimi Spider-Man suits or the Spider-Verse suits?
There hasn't been a Mission Impossible video game since the 2000 gameboy color game.
South Park Digital Studios is owned by Paramount. They’re a new gaming studio that have only made Snow Day so far.Do we know if Paramount holds gaming rights to those IPs? I'm not doubting, but I know rights can be a complicated web of agreements.
Keep Naughty Dog the fuck away from Star Trek.
Isn’t PlayStation their most profitable division?Forget about the ips if this merger starts making sony bleed money you can def expect cuts to the gaming division.
They would, this is not Naughty Dog sharing their tech to Insomniac for free, but two different entertainment companies (just under the same corporate umbrella) with M&A operations working for their own interests.They'd have to make an agreement for licensing rights, that doesn't mean they'd have to pay for them.
Could they? They're simply joint productions common in the industry, not sure how they would make more money working with, say, Warner Bros. instead.PlayStation Productions has almost exclusively work with Sony Pictures where they could probably make more money farming out IP to various studios.
No, it's been an effort by the heads of Sony Group to foster the relationships between their different subsidiaries. It's not a mandate per se, just 8 years ago SCE was working in the Ratchet & Clank movie without any sort of involvement from SPE.They clearly have a mandate from Sony Group to play nice.
Yes, SPE and SIE paid each other, they're cross-promotion opportunities that make a lot of sense.Do you think Sony Pictures paid Insomniac to feature Marvel's Spider-Man 2 in Spider-Man Across the Spider-Verse? Or that Insomniac paid for licensing to use the Raimi Spider-Man suits or the Spider-Verse suits?
It’ll be made entirely of Fetch Quests
wouldn't mean anything, Sony Pictures runs almost as if it's a separate business from playstation.I was about to quote the other guy who said they would ninja turtles. Because I know that belongs to Nickelodeon.
Didn't know they own Nickelodeon.
A proper ninja turtle exclusive to PlayStation is something very interesting to me.
I really liked the action movies they made. I don't know why they go back to the ugly character cartoonish design they had in the last movie. Just vomit every where
Let's see how this fold. For all we know it can be debunked tomorrow. But would have been interesting purchase.
I do wonder who is also bidding here.
Sony has always been a weird company. It's the only electronics company that has AV gear, movies, music, games, and even back in the day VAIO.wouldn't mean anything, Sony Pictures runs almost as if it's a separate business from playstation.
quick example... Sony has always owned Ghostbusters and games/IP was never geared toward exclusive PlayStation material.
Could have something, but would be A thing and not be THE thingI don’t see this being gaming related.
Im sure it is but if they bleed money from this merger they'll save money anywhere they can including their gaming division. So far the streaming wars have been a mess and all these streaming companies are bleeding money which is why they keep merging with each other.Isn’t PlayStation their most profitable division?
Yes.Isn’t PlayStation their most profitable division?
Sony would own bravia core and paramount+. Would you say they'll merge or keep them seperate?Paramount has movie/tv adaptations of stuff like Halo and Sonic. Plus stuff like Nickolodeon (TMNT, Bob Squarepants), Star Trek, Top Gun, Impossible Mission and many movies/tv shows whose IP could be/have been used in gaming.
If Sony acquires them, some of these movies could end as part of the 100+ PS Plus movies.
I don't believe they can get worse. Discovery, Picard, and the (newer) movies are a bastardization of what I knew Star Trek to be, growing up in the "Next Generation" era. People like different things and everything changes, but did we need another shooty, space battle, action oriented franchise? I always figured that genre has had enough representation, and they would have benefited from sticking with a more understated and thoughtful approach to story telling.I mean, can Star Trek get any worse than it currently is under Abrams, Kurtzman, and their band of knobheads?
Ghost Busters is not a ninja turtleswouldn't mean anything, Sony Pictures runs almost as if it's a separate business from playstation.
quick example... Sony has always owned Ghostbusters and games/IP was never geared toward exclusive PlayStation material.
k cool but I also didn't say any IP was bigger than another (turtle games haven't lit up carts either)Ghost Busters is not a ninja turtles
Im sure it is but if they bleed money from this merger they'll save money anywhere they can including their gaming division. So far the streaming wars have been a mess and all these streaming companies are bleeding money which is why they keep merging with each other.
Sony has many streaming services and tv channels, Paramount too. If I was them, I'd merge all in a single service with the entire cinema+tv shows+animation/anime+tv channels+music monster catalog of both corporations to properly compete against Netflix, Spotify, etc.Sony would own bravia core and paramount+. Would you say they'll merge or keep them seperate?
No, they aren't a sinking ship at all.Basically all of Paramount is a sinking ship. But Apollo and Sony are doing the vulture bites looking to swoop in and buy for cheap in hopes of turning it around.
Paramount Global Sees $1 Billion Charge in Q1 for Layoffs and Programming Write Offs
Paramount Global saw a business downturn in both its TV and film units even as it worked to stem losses in streamingvariety.com
So let me guess this right Microsoft buys publishers sony buys paramount does that mean that if Sony indeed does buy paramount with movie ips does that make sony for gaming rights for the movie ip rights? So sony could make TMNT or say transformers playstation exclusive since they own the movie rights?
Sony has many streaming services and tv channels, Paramount too. If I was them, I'd merge all in a single service with the entire cinema+tv shows+animation/anime+tv channels+music monster catalog of both corporations to properly compete against Netflix, Spotify, etc.
But I assume won't happen. In fact, I think that the acquisition won't even happen and it's just an strategy from Paramount to make the folks who have exclusive preference talks (Skydance as I remember) for the acquisition pay a higher price.
Survivor: The Game developed by Bungie. A 30-person slow battle royale where one person gets eliminated each week.
Not to mention other possible synergies. If Sony could make P+ profitable by channeling its movie and show IPs there for more vertical integration, then it could have more to invest in gaming. Or it could go the other way, gaming could be on the decline and the profits from it could be diverted to shows and movies. Regardless if a gaming company grows through acquisition in another space, there are likely going to be ramifications to the gaming space.They would own the IPs of Transformers, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, Star Trek, and South Park. It's definitely gaming related.
I getcha now basically just movies that Paramount has done. Would like to see a new rugrats game my daughter lovesNot exactly how that works.
Sony Pictures would still need to convey the rights to Sony Interactive. It's also key to understand that Paramount doesn't necessarily own the game rights to properties it owns movie rights for.
Transformers for example is owned by Hasbro not Paramount, just as Sonic is owned by Sega not Paramount.
TMNT would be an example that Paramount actually owns and would probably end up being a SIE game. The same can be true of nickelodeon properties like Spungebob and Nickelodeon Brawl. Mission Impossible and Star Trek are other major properties that would probably end up with SIE.
Star Trek in the hands of Sony would be a massive property.
You should look at the Net Income tab.No, they aren't a sinking ship at all.
They make $30B per year and a gross profit of $10B per year.
https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/PARA/paramount-global/revenue#:~:text=Paramount Global revenue for the twelve months ending December 31,a 5.49% increase from 2021
https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/PARA/paramount-global/gross-profit
Yep, I did later and also looked at the operative income (operative profits / loses).You should look at the Net Income tab.
Paramount Global Net Income 2010-2024 | PARA
Paramount Global annual/quarterly net income history and growth rate from 2010 to 2024. Net income can be defined as company's net profit or loss after all revenues, income items, and expenses have been accounted for. <ul style='margin-top:10px;'> <li>Paramount Global net income...www.macrotrends.net
Paramount Global annual/quarterly net income history and growth rate from 2010 to 2023. Net income can be defined as company's net profit or loss after all revenues, income items, and expenses have been accounted for.
- Paramount Global net income for the quarter ending December 31, 2023 was $0.514B, a 2347.62% increase year-over-year.
- Paramount Global net income for the twelve months ending December 31, 2023 was $-0.608B, a 155.07% decline year-over-year.
- Paramount Global annual net income for 2023 was $-0.608B, a 155.07% decline from 2022.
- Paramount Global annual net income for 2022 was $1.104B, a 75.7% decline from 2021.
- Paramount Global annual net income for 2021 was $4.543B, a 87.57% increase from 2020.
Yes, Columbia is a Sony Pictures subsiciary. Sony bought it.Didn’t sony buy columbia house pictures or whatever? that one with the logo of the woman before ghostbusters
Sony would own bravia core and paramount+. Would you say they'll merge or keep them seperate?
Actually that could be very great.The Yellowstone National Park is famous for all kind of sightings especially Dogman.Could be an amazing horror game.Would I play a Yellowstone videogame?... Yeah, maybe. lol
I don't think the Californians running modern Playstation studios can handle South Park.They would own the IPs of Transformers, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, Star Trek, and South Park. It's definitely gaming related.
They would all be trans is my guess.
Would love to see Naughty Dog's take on Mean Girls.
Why? If this is a commentary on naughty dogs supposed wokeness, I’d argue of all brands they’d be well suited. Star Trek was and always has been renowned for its “progressiveness”, even from the original series, waaaay ahead of its time on many things. They could do a great job with that IP. They won’t they; as they steer their own ship and make their own IP.Keep Naughty Dog the fuck away from Star Trek.
After TLoU2, I don't trust Naughty Dog with writing any coherent and well-paced story. Wokeness is the last thing I have an issue with.Why? If this is a commentary on naughty dogs supposed wokeness, I’d argue of all brands they’d be well suited. Star Trek was and always has been renowned for its “progressiveness”, even from the original series, waaaay ahead of its time on many things. They could do a great job with that IP. They won’t they; as they steer their own ship and make their own IP.
Pretty much everything they own is sinking and their streaming service is big money loser. As per the article I posted (dated Feb 2024). If Sony and Apollo want in. Then they got multiple fronts which are doing lousy.Yep, I did later and also looked at the operative income (operative profits / loses).
They were fine with operative and net profit until 2019, when they merged CBS Corporation and Viacom to become Viacom CBS, which later would be renamed to Paramount Global, the company being sold now.
Seems that since then every year they have something generating huge operative costs that is eating the net profits that the company is generating. I don't know what, maybe some new executives are stealing money or something to spend it in hookers and coke. Whoevers buys it has to restructure it and put some order there.
Yes, Columbia is a Sony Pictures subsiciary. Sony bought it.
Fair, I partly agree with the pacing problems in last of us 2. The rest tho seemed fine to me. It was an irrepressibly depressing story tho that actively went out of its way to make you feel like crap. Which was…interesting, but certainly memorable (seriously tho, I’d suggest it have warning for anyone who may struggle with mental health problems, I could see it being quite distressing/triggering for some). Which would of course be totally the wrong vibe for the optimistic hopefully vibe of Star Trek. But that’s just what the last of us was, uncharted had a much more appropriate vibe.After TLoU2, I don't trust Naughty Dog with writing any coherent and well-paced story. Wokeness is the last thing I have an issue with.
Their sesonrs division makes a lot but their insurance division last I read is gold mine. But yea playstation kills it tooIsn’t PlayStation their most profitable division?