Dr.Morris79
Member
I love women protagonists!GAF any time a game has a woman as the protaganist
As long as they're good.
I love women protagonists!GAF any time a game has a woman as the protaganist
no, they said get used to not owning games (eg don't buy, rent from our service).Didn’t someone say this about Star Wars Outlaws?
no, they said get used to not owning games (eg don't buy, rent from our service).
which is what I did. honestly pretty good time for $15.
true, it was just a general comment from Ubi, not specific to Outlaws.I mean, they never said that regarding Star Wars Outlaws though lol
The left has been brigading against games because of "problematic" actors for years. Just giving it back.That's a very valid cause of concern in this day and age.
I’d rather have a fifty something woman portrayed as a believable samurai than a bimbo going against seasoned warriors. But I’d also rather have a new Cole McGrath adventure so I’ll let you and your “no girls allowed” policy sink this samurai nonsense. Bring back the fun.Again with the gaslighting "wHy dO YoU cArE? thEre's no agEndA I cAn SeE!" when Sony has so blatantly typecasted a trans dude as the protag of the game. The heroine face looks like an old lady at best. But noooo, it's all innocent, no propaganda going on...
Go eat a dick. I'm all for a female protag, but not... this.
true, it was just a general comment from Ubi, not specific to Outlaws.
but honestly their games and summer blockbuster popcorn anyway, I play them through and have fun, no need to re-tread or 'own' them in my collection.
Same.I’d rather have a fifty something woman portrayed as a believable samurai than a bimbo going against seasoned warriors. But I’d also rather have a new Cole McGrath adventure so I’ll let you and your “no girls allowed” policy sink this samurai nonsense. Bring back the fun.
Funny you say that because the model is not a girl either.“no girls allowed”
Funny you say that because the model is not a girl either.
I’ve heard Firewalk are free now…Semi OT, if they did continue InFamous but maybe had another team do it, I wonder which team would be tasked to revive the IP?
No. It’s a woman, kiddo.Funny you say that because the model is not a girl either.
I doubt in current day Sony is enough talent to make something as good as inFamous 2.
WOW! I might have to call out of work or something, did you tell the news? /s
Nnnnaaaaaahhhh… I’ve tried to play Spiderman 3 times now. I bought the LE all hyped but that snooze fest always demolish my will.Maybe Insomniac could.
Maybe Insomniac could.
Like, lets say they skip Ratchet for an entry and do Spiderman IP and InFamous reboot or something. I feel the have the talent, made open worlds before and have the tech and members form Sucker Punch can go to them to do that title or something.
It could work
Nnnnaaaaaahhhh… I’ve tried to play Spiderman 3 times now. I bought the LE all hyped but that snooze fest always demolish my will.
lol don't beat me lolInsomniac? After Miles Morales and Spider-man 2? Writing in games from them are going to be dumpster fires until they fire their current writers and get good writers.
members form Sucker Punch can go to them to do that title or something.
I can't deny Insomniac's quality and their ability to create functional worlds and fluid gameplay, so maybe Sucker Punch members that wrote, did the creative direction can do those parts or something.
ikrAnyone with this attitude is a complete piece of shit.
yeah honestly its beyond pathetic at this point.GAF any time a game has a woman as the protaganist
Honestly, you're really stretching with this comparison.I will be happy to see another huge budget Sony game get Concorded heh
You know SP is probably irritated by the comment and now having to work internally to develop a statement to clarify/Rectify an opinion that's not of the studios.That's a heck of a take considering shit lately....mate, you don't want to actively prod the (very loud and majority consumer) bears.
Like, that take says to me "we're making a stand here, for some reason, etc" - moreso than defending his actor's honor/skills/performance.
Stands and 2024 go together like shit and toothpaste.
Be like "concord today...CALL OF DUTY TOMORROW!"Honestly, you're really stretching with this comparison.
I do the same, but people don't do that, some people have brand loyalty...which is a very silly thing to have since not one of these businesses give a shit about you personally, they only care about the money from your wallet/purse.It's not his product. If you don't like a game (any game), you shouldn't buy the game. I've been doing that since forever.
...and despite his views on social media, he was one of the few execs that openly admitted to ps3's screw-ups, sony's arrogance in 2006 and he did not breathe down 1st party studio's throats asking them to shoehorn live service games.And there are actually people wishing he came back and replaced Hermen?
Just look at the difference in their Twitter bios.
It's not too bad, Druckman already saved the day by changing Drake's son into a daughterKratos is our only hope. I bet Sony is biting their own ass for making him have a son and not another daughter.
Just his response regarding this game alone is very antagonistic towards consumers and I would not trust him in a high position if I was a company. He seems more radical now than when he worked for Sony.He is not wrong, and there is nothing rude about it unless you are easily triggered.
...and despite his views on social media, he was one of the few execs that openly admitted to ps3's screw-ups, sony's arrogance in 2006 and he did not breathe down 1st party studio's throats asking them to shoehorn live service games.
How do you define fail? Most people here seem to agree that Horizon or GOW weren't great sequels, yet they got the same high scores on Metacritic and sales in the millions. Even without the bundle thing in 2022 sales would have been great.It is going to fail but it will be due to a combination of what most of the other PS5 AAA Sony games have also failed at, being sequels and not adding much new stuff,
The left has been brigading against games because of "problematic" actors for years. Just giving it back.
Were you born yesterday or something?Just his response regarding this game alone is very antagonistic towards consumers and I would not trust him in a high position if I was a company. He seems more radical now than when he worked for Sony.
My join date on Gaf should tell you I am at least 4 years old.Were you born yesterday or something?
I will wait till your balls drop then because I don't like abusing small kids digitally.My join date on Gaf should tell you I am at least 4 years old.
I will wait till your balls drop then because I don't like abusing small kids digitally.
keep your fingers to yourself!I will wait till your balls drop then because I don't like abusing small kids digitally.
So you just like abusing kids after their balls have dropped. Well at least I know what I’m dealing with.I will wait till your balls drop then because I don't like abusing small kids digitally.
This. ^Is the issue the female protagonist or is it because she's a female protagonist in a game made by a western studio?
I mean... its starting to check out and makes a lot of sense with these post tbh.I am at least 4 years old.
look man, you walked into this.... no one made you say some weird shit like this lolSo you just like abusing kids after their balls have dropped. Well at least I know what I’m dealing with.
There’s nothing wrong with having female protagonists per se. It’s the underlying ideology that a lot of gamers suspect these companies are operating under that pushes them to have strong female characters over male ones as a way to virtue signal how pro-modern feminist they are. Strong male protagonists under this view simply perpetuate patriarchal norms. It also becomes a bit conspicuous when all the men in these female-led games are either non-masculine, incompetent bafoons, or evil.GAF any time a game has a woman as the protaganist