That's not true, whale meat is delicious and dosen't taste like anything else.onken said:I've had it. Much like whale it's nothing to get excited about, merely people clinging on to old traditions "just because".
That's not true, whale meat is delicious and dosen't taste like anything else.onken said:I've had it. Much like whale it's nothing to get excited about, merely people clinging on to old traditions "just because".
Divvy said:![]()
Maybe someone should have.
Cereal KiIIer said:It takes a lot to gross me out... This does.
Cereal KiIIer said:Did people voted for him because there was nobody else??? I don't see another reason.
Misterinenja said:I think it is much more ethical to eat cat or dog meat for example than endangered animals.
especially when you take in to consideration that the bulk of an animal is eaten, rather than say just it's paws where it's just discarded to die slowly.Misterinenja said:I think it is much more ethical to eat cat or dog meat for example than endangered animals.
Stet said:
AbortedWalrusFetus said:I have had shark fin soup. It's absolutely delicious. People say that the fin doesn't add anything to the flavor, which I have no idea if it's true or not, but it adds a WORLD to the texture. In my opinion texture is one of the most important aspects of a food and the texture can actually make or break a dish. That said, the texture of the shark fin really did make the dish for me. It was unlike anything I've ever had, and it was extremely enjoyable.
That's sort of what bothered me about Gordon Ramsey's analysis of shark fin soup, because he's said time and time again how important texture is to a dish. I realize that he was trying to make a point about how terrible the practices are, and I generally agree with him, but it seemed a tad bit disingenuous to say that the shark fin adds absolutely nothing to the dish, because it very clearly does add.
In general the practices around obtaining the shark's fin are deplorable. They're wasteful and often cruel. That said, if it could be done in a sustainable manner, with reasonable slaughtering practices and no waste, I'd be for it. Until then I doubt I would partake again (unless it was free like it was the last time, no sense in letting it go to waste once it's in front of me).
Kinitari said:Is the texture absolutely unique to shark fins? It seems like you could find something of similar, if not better texture without any problem - and have it add to the flavouring of the soup. The only reason to keep using shark fins is traditional sentimentality at that point.
Kinitari said:Is the texture absolutely unique to shark fins? It seems like you could find something of similar, if not better texture without any problem - and have it add to the flavouring of the soup. The only reason to keep using shark fins is traditional sentimentality at that point.
Kinitari said:Is the texture absolutely unique to shark fins? It seems like you could find something of similar, if not better texture without any problem - and have it add to the flavouring of the soup. The only reason to keep using shark fins is traditional sentimentality at that point.
razgriz417 said:Hong Kong food stand are known for their "Poor Man's" Shark's fin soup where they use a gelatinous noodle instead of shark's fin. If the broth is done correctly, I really think its replaceable
AbortedWalrusFetus said:I would totally eat it regularly if so. The texture and the flavor of the broth is just so awesome.
explodet said:The best part of the shark fin ban debate, the part that I'm surprised nobody's mentioned yet? (unless I missed it)
One of the councilors brought in a helium-filled remote controlled inflatable shark.
http://i132.photobucket.com/albums/q27/zenexplosion/4o5iw.jpg/IMG]
They had to call a 10-minute recess to get rid of it.
De Baeremaeker was the one who brought it in, he was in favor of the ban.[/QUOTE]
The account of the meeting is funny. Sounds like this guy is known for these stunts.
[url]http://www.torontosun.com/2011/10/26/inflatable-shark-bites-council-debate[/url]
You don't feel it's unethical to chop off a body part of a shark and leave it to die? Especially when said body part is only added to a soup to boost price and as a novelty?Gaborn said:Questions of the desirability of the meat from a taste perspective aside, assuming there is no health issue I see no reason this shouldn't be legal.
Dude Abides said:I had shark fin soup in Thailand. It's nothing special.
AbortedWalrusFetus said:I can't resist it any longer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVCtkzIXYzQ
In seriousness though, there are several varieties of the fin, and the textures come out differently, as I understand. Was yours more noodly? Or was it more a... solid?
razgriz417 said:Hong Kong food stand are known for their "Poor Man's" Shark's fin soup where they use a gelatinous noodle instead of shark's fin. If the broth is done correctly, I really think its replaceable
explodet said:The best part of the shark fin ban debate, the part that I'm surprised nobody's mentioned yet? (unless I missed it)
One of the councilors brought in a helium-filled remote controlled inflatable shark.
![]()
They had to call a 10-minute recess to get rid of it.
De Baeremaeker was the one who brought it in, he was in favor of the ban.
Gaborn said:Questions of the desirability of the meat from a taste perspective aside, assuming there is no health issue I see no reason this shouldn't be legal.
I think he was talking about cats and dogs.EvilMario said:How about the legality of how the fin is obtained? If they're catching non-endangered sharks and using the entire shark, cool. If they're just cutting fins off and tossing them back in to die, which is illegal, because fins are easy to smuggle, you're still in favor of it?
He ran a US-style campaign, riding on a wave of right-wing populism in the suburbs.Cereal KiIIer said:Did people voted for him because there was nobody else??? I don't see another reason.
parrotbeak said:I think he was talking about cats and dogs.
Gaborn said:I'm a guy that normally takes the pro-freedom side (I oppose bans on horse meat, on foie gras, etc etc etc) but I don't have a problem with this. Often shark fin soup uses the fins from endangered sharks. I think that it could or should be approved if someone set up a shark aquaculture like they do with clams and oysters but with the danger involved I think that's unlikely.
lunarworks said:He ran a US-style campaign, riding on a wave of right-wing populism in the suburbs.
He fabricated a financial crisis, posed as the "average, beer-drinking, sports-loving guy" as opposed to "those artsy fartsy elitists", had a wildly successful campaign slogan ("Stop The Gravy Train!"), said he'd cut taxes and spending, end "the war on cars" put those pinko cyclists in their place, scrap a good transit plan and built a subway ("out of the way of cars") instead, and he promised there'd be no service cuts.
(So what happened? Turns out there was no "gravy", he cut some taxes actually putting the city's finances in trouble, we can't afford a subway, and he's cutting all sorts of services.)
/slight thread derail
JGS said:My heart tells me good on this one. I saw some documentary about theses guys just cutting the fins off and tossing the rest of the shark while alive back in the water. It was horrible.
jamesinclair said:California banned it this year.
Best law the state has ever made.
Shark fin soup is barbaric shit and China should be ashamed of themselves for letting destructive idiotic superstitions have a place in the modern world.
Rinoa said:I want to see this on video, that's hilarious.
edit:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0XaqtRECMo
ok now I want one badly
Please try not to provoke it, Nunziata said.
When she tried to continue with the meeting, an unimpressed Councillor Michael Thompson rose to demand the shark get the hook.
Madame speaker, I am here along with all members of council to do the business of council, Thompson said.
It appears that there are some other activities that are taking place in council and I would ask that you ask the councillor who is actually stick-handling the mechanical toy to basically stickhandle it down to the ground in order that we can actually have some decorum in this chamber in order to conduct the business at hand.
Nunziata then asked De Baeremaeker to reel in his shark.
Can you take it down? Nunziata said. There is no need for childish behaviour in the council chambers.
At this point, it was fairly clear De Baeremaeker was having trouble steering the shark as it bumped into a wall.
Hes lost control! Deputy Mayor Doug Holyday joked.
Glenn, just get it down, Councillor Gord Perks added.
Shoot it down, another councillor shouted.
When De Baeremaeker failed to get the shark, Nunziata stopped the meeting.
What were going to do is were going to recess until Councillor De Baeremaeker decides that hes willing to come back to council and do his job as a councillor rather than misbehave, recess for 10 minutes, she said.
The crowd applauded and eventually the shark, after being beached on top of a wall separating the council chambers from a lounge area, disappeared from view and the meeting started up again.
Rinoa said:Yeah the slideshow was just a few pics but the quotes are hilarious.
Seems they lose control easily though. Or maybe it was the range, it was a huge area.
Goldrush said:Why so much discussion about the taste? Would it make a difference if it taste like 5 pounds of bacon compressed into a single bite?
I suppose that's the way I view it too. I don't normally care about slaughter, but this was such a blatant waste.Gaborn said:I understand the emotional side of this, I don't like seeing animals needlessly tortured like that, it's brutal. But from a policy standpoint the more important issue is the lack of sustainability of shark fish stocks. Other fish have fisheries and aquaculture set up that ensure a degree of sustainability, as well as standards that spare the young and pregnant. In shark finning that is not the case. It's closer to, say, the slaughter of the buffalo by pioneers. they didn't care if they were young or old or pregnant females and they didn't even care about the bulk of the meat from their kills. There was no thought to sustainability in regards to the slaughter.
Emotional responses to this are valid personal concerns and it's definitely a horrible practice but there are larger issues and reasons for it to be banned.