LordOcidax
Member
I think they've been working on this for some time now.Designing it, sourcing parts, and manufacturing them will take more than 3 years unless they've been trying to make one since as soon as the Switch really took off.
I think they've been working on this for some time now.Designing it, sourcing parts, and manufacturing them will take more than 3 years unless they've been trying to make one since as soon as the Switch really took off.
It's clear that Sony is planning to release a handheld console alongside the PS6, and it's sure to be technically top-notch.
Sony is so confuse right now.
Are they forgot PSP and PSvita? What kind of stupid workers are inside Playstation HQ right now to make this stupid question after all Playstation legacy?
The question is if PSP will be resurrected, will Sony mandate developer to make games for PSP version along with the console version, and PSP games must have a console version?
If they do, it will fail again.
Switch works cause it's the only console Nintendo needs to support. PS6 and a handheld would be another disaster.
Sony is trying to understand if they should bother porting some games to the NS 2 or not, like they are already doing on PC.
I think VR2 shows the answer to this.The question is if PSP will be resurrected, will Sony mandate developer to make games for PSP version along with the console version, and PSP games must have a console version?
I understand, it might create the same problem encountered by xbox series x and xbox series S.No one is crazy enough to split into separate games for Handheld & Home Consoles again if anything the games will just have handheld settings.
Lead the console market since they entered.
Green rats never learn.
Did Sony mandate developers to make all there games with PSVR2 capability? To be honest, for me, I hope yes. It would have been amazing too see games with VR capability like Death Stranding, Astrobot, Silent hill 2 remake, COD, MHWild, and upcoming games like Indiana Jones, Forza Horizon, Doom dark ages, and Death stranding 2.I think VR2 shows the answer to this.
Aside from very rare, specific cases, they aren't bringing games to Switch 2.Sony is trying to understand if they should bother porting some games to the NS 2 or not, like they are already doing on PC.
I doubt it.Aside from very rare, specific cases, they aren't bringing games to Switch 2.
Lego was that special case because it's Lego. I'd bet our accounts it's not going to happen. Exclusives still matter to Sony every bit as much as Nintendo.I doubt it.
They are bringing them to PC, and PC is Microsoft's platform.
They brought Lego Horizon to the Switch cause it was the only thing the Switch could handle, basically. But now? I expect just as many as the PC ports.
They wont do it immediately, but if the NS 2 becomes a huge success like the original did, it will be a no brainer.
Oh shit! Last of Us 2 Switch 2 edition confirmed!
Exactly this. They're trying to gauge what they can do to increase profits. No other reason for it.'You're gonna be cool if we raise our game prices to $80, right?'
Exactly.If they do, it will fail again.
Switch works cause it's the only console Nintendo needs to support. PS6 and a handheld would be another disaster.
Sony is trying to understand if they should bother porting some games to the NS 2 or not, like they are already doing on PC.
Agreed. The Portal is the best remote player by far on the market. Although the build quality could still be a bit better, imho.
...we have some around here defending it like prices should be higher.... inflation and all.Lots of people would probably be saying 80 dollars for base games are too much but that's not the only bad thing.
additional money form ports, without heavy investment in portable hardware. if this true, it will change many things in the future. console wars aside, it is not the time for wars, it's the time for more cash as much as possible.I doubt it.
They are bringing them to PC, and PC is Microsoft's platform.
They brought Lego Horizon to the Switch cause it was the only thing the Switch could handle, basically. But now? I expect just as many as the PC ports.
They wont do it immediately, but if the NS 2 becomes a huge success like the original did, it will be a no brainer.
What about the PC ports, then?Lego was that special case because it's Lego. I'd bet our accounts it's not going to happen. Exclusives still matter to Sony every bit as much as Nintendo.
I do actually have a deck of Hanafuda cards made by Nintendo. It's pretty neat. Used it to play Koi koi once.I hear your trumbling voice from the idea of a Sony putting all its weight in a hybrid market. Nintendo will resort to making playing cards then lol
Cool, your collection will get way bigger fast once Sony does a hybridI do actually have a deck of Hanafuda cards made by Nintendo. It's pretty neat. Used it to play Koi koi once.
Because a PC is a different kind of platform. Because some titles will do really well, possibly even better, on PC. There's going to be a fine line with PC players about what to release and when that will always have a different focus than on competing consoles. Expecting the same treatment with a Nintendo anything is just pure hopium unless something catastrophic happens like what happened to Xbox moving away from the hardware business. It's just not happening.What about the PC ports, then?
You dont see Nintendo games being ported to PC. So no, Sony doesnt value their exclusives nearly as much as Nintendo, and its totally possible that we may see Sony games on the Switch 2.
Cool, your collection will get way bigger fast once Sony does a hybrid
psychologically, that's actutally a thing,I'm about to tell them I like the $80 games because it makes me feel like I'm part of a higher class of gamers & they should go for $90 so no one will think that PlayStation is for peasants.
"Non-popular handhelds from 20-13 years ago are relevant for modern market research!"Sony is so confuse right now.
Are they forgot PSP and PSvita? What kind of stupid workers are inside Playstation HQ right now to make this stupid question after all Playstation legacy?
... What?Because a PC is a different kind of platform. Because some titles will do really well, possibly even better, on PC. There's going to be a fine line with PC players about what to release and when that will always have a different focus than on competing consoles. Expecting the same treatment with a Nintendo anything is just pure hopium unless something catastrophic happens like what happened to Xbox moving away from the hardware business. It's just not happening.
PC was a more neutral platform to squeeze sales from. Nintendo isn't. I don't know what's so hard about this. Both Sony AND Nintendo would gain a hell of a lot more sales putting their games on each other's systems. All the reasons either one could start doing it now existed long before now, so why haven't they done it?... What?
Have you seen the sales from Sony PC ports? They were abysmal most of the time.
You telling me Spider-Man or God of War wouldnt sell much more on the Switch 2 compared to PC?
Considering that many Nintendo fans have no other console/PC? And the portability appeal of the Switch 2?
No hopium here, l'm no Nintendo fanboy and I wont be buying a Switch 2.
If you are ever in doubt about who the market leader is, look at how the competition react to what Nintendo do.
Sony is so confuse right now.
Are they forgot PSP and PSvita? What kind of stupid workers are inside Playstation HQ right now to make this stupid question after all Playstation legacy?
PC isnt neutral. Windows is a Microsoft's platform.PC was a more neutral platform to squeeze sales from. Nintendo isn't. I don't know what's so hard about this. Both Sony AND Nintendo would gain a hell of a lot more sales putting their games on each other's systems. All the reasons either one could start doing it now existed long before now, so why haven't they done it?
If you are ever in doubt about who the market leader is, look at how the competition react to what Nintendo do.
Pretty sure you're the only one confused. PSP and PS Vita were not hybrids. Nor were they as successful as Switch. Their questions are justifiable.
Release date
- Original: March 3, 2017
Console ps6 gonna have minimum of 220-250W tdp bro, they need to make it at least 3x stronger from base ps5/2x stronger from ps5pr0 before ai upscaling/rt so they will need every bit of powerdraw they can get, and im talking 3nm tsmc process node here.Exactly.
For a new handheld to be fully supported, they would have to do a hybrid approach similar to Nintendo and the Switch.
Based on this old Sony patent.
Sony patent envisions dual GPU console and cloud gaming, could be the PS5 Pro
A patent filed in January last year by Sony reveals an ambitious project of a console that sports not one but two GPUs, similar to some PC configurations with Nvidia's SLI and AMD's CrossFire GPU support. The patent, however, says that the implementation of two GPUs in a console is much more elaborate than on a PC.
The patent details how the two GPUs would work to render a single frame simultaneously or just split the frame into two and feed it to the two GPU units. Only one of the GPUs will control the HDMI output, which requires the GPU managing the video output to read the frames from the other one.
![]()
I can see a Sony PS6 hybrid console based on something like FIG. 5 for example. Where die 1 would be the main chip in the handheld, which can dock into a console base with die 2 via PCIe.
I'm not entirely sure how a concept like this would work but I expect the specs to be something like this based on FIG. 5.
Handheld:
8 Core Zen6c
36 CU RDNA5
24GB GDDR7W
SSD Controller
15–35 W
Console base:
4 Core Zen6
72 CU RDNA5
180 W
They are the market leader in handhelds. What's your point?
That's an artificial division in the market and they are in competition. Period.
If they do, it will fail again.
Switch works cause it's the only console Nintendo needs to support. PS6 and a handheld would be another disaster.
Sony is trying to understand if they should bother porting some games to the NS 2 or not, like they are already doing on PC.
Tell you what, bookmark this thread and come back at the end of the Switch 2 lifespan to see where things are at. I'll be more than happy to eat crow if I'm wrong. Dead serious about it. Hell, we can do yearly updates even.PC isnt neutral. Windows is a Microsoft's platform.
No one would have guessed that Sony would port their first party titles to PC years ago, and yet here we are.
"Why now?". Many possible answers. Now the Switch 2 can handle those games, now Sony is under Herman's lead, now Sony has no portable in sight and etc.
It might happen, or it might not, but I wouldnt be surprised.
We have a dealTell you what, bookmark this thread and come back at the end of the Switch 2 lifespan to see where things are at. I'll be more than happy to eat crow if I'm wrong. Dead serious about it. Hell, we can do yearly updates even.
Lets say Sony wants to release a handheld along with PS6 then. They have two options:Sony will release a PS6 Handheld that will be supported for certain titles. Most games will be able to be downported. You're seeing CP2077 for crying out loud on a Switch 2. It's not ideal or amazing, but it works
Same will be true of a lot of PS6 games and their PS6 handheld. It will get far better support than Vita because the scalability in today's hardware/software environment is much more robust than it was when Vita released.