• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Sony was “lucky to survive” the PS3 era, says ex PlayStation boss Shawn Layden - “PS3 was Sony’s Icarus moment. We flew too close to the sun,”

Muddy

Member
Very Interesting. According to some around here, you would have thought it was a stellar success crushing the Xbox 360....

Why can’t it be both?

Sony and Microsoft have different standards.

The PS3 was a failure by Sony standards.

The Xbox 360 was a success by Microsoft standards.

The PS3 still outsold the Xbox 360.

It’s no different to the Vita and Steamdeck. Vita is considered a failure with 15 million total sales. The Steamdeck a success with 3 million total sales.
 
Last edited:

Spiral1407

Member
I remember hearing one dev say that the PS3 put half the industry out of business. The fact that it managed to beat 360s inflated red ring numbers at the end of the lifecycle was quite a... 180.
Wouldn't PS3 also be inflated considering they had the exact same hardware defect?
 

panda-zebra

Member
Yep. Back when Sony was able to look back and say hey we fucked up. And make some changes.

Nowadays they look at Concord and say hey we are still all in.
They learned lessons back then and, for their sakes, they're hopefully learning lessons in the here and now.

They've never been shy to shut down a game in production or a studio that doesn't fit, but they've let the odd lemon slip through. At least they didn't do an Ubisoft here and drag Concord out for a year or more, they just binned the whole lot in a matter of days when the writing was on the wall.

Their past top brass have repeatedly said nothing is too big for the axe, that there's a process and stuff has to meet criteria along the way or face the shit tip. The fact it even made it to release is probably thanks to being gaas in nature, that gave it a few free passes with their drive to do more in that space and the learning they're experiencing. From Concord to Helldivers II to Destiny 2 and everything in between there's lots and lots of lessons to be learned, lol...spending a fortune while tying up resources making a product that resonated with practically nobody is exactly the kind of result they could and should have predicted when they previously churned out a smaller title with a similar "vibrant cast" of banality in the equally dire designed-by-committee Destruction AllStars.
 

Sooner

Member
PS3 sold 88 million.

Wii U sold 13.5, GameCube sold 22 million. You combine those generations, double the number and it's still fewer units than PS3.

Saying PS3 generation didn't meet Sony's expectations is fair. Saying they're lucky to survive, especially after coming off of selling 155 million units, is just hyperbole.
 
Regardless, it was the only console you could play MGS4 on.

Shockingly, it is still the only console you can play MGS4 on.
SVGtHwP.jpeg


Still makes me laugh 16 years later. The memes back then were so peak.
 

Z O N E

Member
I mean, despite its issues, it still had the Playstation name to carry it, especially coming from the big daddy PS2. I think Xbox 360 doing what it did was more impressive as Xbox wasn't really that big outside of USA.
 
PS3 sold 88 million.

Wii U sold 13.5, GameCube sold 22 million. You combine those generations, double the number and it's still fewer units than PS3.

Saying PS3 generation didn't meet Sony's expectations is fair. Saying they're lucky to survive, especially after coming off of selling 155 million units, is just hyperbole.
Actually...Sony was losing over 300 dollars by each PS3 unit sold at 500$ on retail. It almost bankrupt Sony.

They literally lost all the money they made with BOTH PS1 and PS2 generations with the release of the PS3.

How many units they sold didn't matter.

That's why they removed PS2 Emotion engine, cut 2 USB ports, all the card ports the PS3 had, and quickly removed more stuff that was included on that launch unit. It wasn't sustainable.

Impressive as fuck at the time...but it almost destroyed them and it's not hyperbole.
 
Last edited:
PS3 completely turned its image around. By the end, it was looked at very favourably for its brilliant library of games. So not really luck, but more hard work from Sony to set things right.
 

Sharius

Member
look who talk there, someone tell gamer don't buy the game if it's too much DEI, lmao, late gen PS3 survive because they cast for gamer need, not tell them to not buy their thing

dude just came in at peak hour and think he did a great job
 
Last edited:
  • Thoughtful
Reactions: amc
The guy has not worked at Sony in I think 6 or 7 years.

Yet it seems whenever he gets face time, all he does is talk Sony like he still works there.
He's retired, he can say whatever he wants and right now he's dishing about his old employer like no other former Sony exec ever has so why are you complaining
 

Papa_Wisdom

Gold Member
I really wish I’d have picked up a fat, fully back cat ps3 back in the day. That along with a ps5 and you have access to all the ps back cat. Plus I think it’s aged really well in relation to its looks
 

Heimdall_Xtreme

Hermen Hulst Fanclub's #1 Member
PS3, I remember it as a great console, which arrived at a period of time when I was having a worse time, and even more so with the disappointment of the Xbox 360 that I had.

it never was a bad console. But in PS5 That is bad but due to the terrible management of its previous and current CEO.
 
two HDMI-outs
communicates with your toaster
boomerang controller
spiderman font
two jobs
"Are the e3 trailers realtime?" "ohh probably maaaaybe" wink wink

weird, exciting, and dumb time
 

Ceadeus

Member
I would gladly go back to this era. I can't be alone missing that generation.

I also miss free online gaming!! The PS3 had this going for itself.
 
I would gladly go back to this era. I can't be alone missing that generation.

I also miss free online gaming!! The PS3 had this going for itself.
I feel like this is one of those "i miss the good ol days" moments.

The beginning of the HD era was rough as fuck. Games went back to 30fps that gen (and we're still recovering from this), many didn't even have that much. Games looked brown as fuck. The huge Sony hack that made PS3 offline for an entire month. Those game updates that lasted forever. The moment my PS3 stopped working for a day because PS3 didn't recognize February 29 as an actual day :)

If we had games nowadays performing like they did back then it would be outrageous i can tell you that much.

That said...Sony was experimental as fuck. Many of those games flopped but they were interesting. Plus, PS Home was something else. I also remember Uncharted 2 and Killzone 2 online modes. I spent MANY hours in there. LittleBigPlanet was addictive as hell as well. I always say MGS4 and LBP were the turning points for PS3 and still stand by that.

Also...the Buzz! games! Started on the PS2 but PS3 had those as well and the remotes were now wireless which was great.
 

LordOfChaos

Member
I would gladly go back to this era. I can't be alone missing that generation.

I also miss free online gaming!! The PS3 had this going for itself.

I've definitely never felt as exited about gaming as during that generation again, but I'm not sure if it was the generation or that I just happened to be the right age for it and my excitement response for gaming is blunted as an adult
 

Sooner

Member
Actually...Sony was losing over 300 dollars by each PS3 unit sold at 500$ on retail. It almost bankrupt Sony.
Sony was losing $300 per unit sold. So, thet were going to go bankrupt because they didn't sell more?

Reminds me of the old commercial, "We lose money on every unit sold, but we make up for it with volume".
 

Kings Field

Member
Launch day 60gb was a memory. Bought my first flat screen same day.

Admired core, demons souls, dark.souls 1&2, nd games,
 

Ceadeus

Member
That said...Sony was experimental as fuck. Many of those games flopped but they were interesting. Plus, PS Home was something else. I also remember Uncharted 2 and Killzone 2 online modes. I spent MANY hours in there. LittleBigPlanet was addictive as hell as well. I always say MGS4 and LBP were the turning points for PS3 and still stand by that.
That's precisely what I do miss! Sony being willing and experimental was the best Sony to me! With the PS3 and with the PSP. Many games flopped but it made a really nice and exciting portfolio of games. That special feeling was, that you never knew what would be coming next and that's the sparkle who's been lost during PS4.

I said it before but PS Home should be brought back for the PSVR2. The headset needs its own social lobby to compete with Meta Horizon and PS Home is the answer. But Sony are like
Homer Simpson Thinking GIF

I've definitely never felt as exited about gaming as during that generation again, but I'm not sure if it was the generation or that I just happened to be the right age for it and my excitement response for gaming is blunted as an adult
It could be your age but Sony definitely were taking more risk and more experimental with their release. Which made for a very diverse library of weird and quirky titles. Nobody miss some of the graphical filters or 30 fps but the games were diverse and exciting!
 

Taur007

Member
I remember hearing one dev say that the PS3 put half the industry out of business. The fact that it managed to beat 360s inflated red ring numbers at the end of the lifecycle was quite a... 180.
Not necessarily when you consider MS got real lazy when it came to games, they started venturing off to things like Kinect

Had they stayed the same MS that secured games like bioshock and mass effect as exclusives, I don’t think Sony catches them
 

marquimvfs

Member
Very Interesting. According to some around here, you would have thought it was a stellar success crushing the Xbox 360....
Never ever saw that. But on the opposite side, there were folks that swear that Xbox 360 won that gen...
 
Last edited:

RAIDEN1

Member
Regardless, it was the only console you could play MGS4 on.

Shockingly, it is still the only console you can play MGS4 on.
Not only that but it currently is the ONLY console you can play the last great Ridge Racer game on, Puppeteer, Motorstorm series, Resistance, to name but a few you could only dream of those games coming to the PS5...
 

nial

Member
The first half of the PS3 was much better than the second one in terms of first-party software. This is my ultimate PlayStation hot take.
Huh, completely abandoning the initiative (which is what you want them to do here) wouldn't be exactly reminiscent of how Sony handled the PS3 gen, at all.
 

UltimaKilo

Gold Member
It was such an incredible machine, and once developers got the hang of it, put out some remarkable software.

I do wish Sony would have continued to develop their own chip.

In my opinion, it was the last impressive hardware Sony released, but I’m hopeful for the PS6.

Nintendo abandoning directly competing with Sony and Microsoft, along with the numerous missteps by Xbox under Phil Spencer, has hurt Sony’s quality AND quantity of both software and hardware. :(
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
He's retired, he can say whatever he wants and right now he's dishing about his old employer like no other former Sony exec ever has so why are you complaining
He's not retired. I'm not complaining. I love it when video game employees dish out dirt about their companies.


 

Iced Arcade

Member
Sony falling from the top with the PS3 created some of the best Sony. ever!


Not easily achieving the #1 spot and having to fight gave us a hungry PlayStation, and we gained a lot because of it.
 

Spiral1407

Member
I feel like this is one of those "i miss the good ol days" moments.

The beginning of the HD era was rough as fuck. Games went back to 30fps that gen (and we're still recovering from this), many didn't even have that much. Games looked brown as fuck. The huge Sony hack that made PS3 offline for an entire month. Those game updates that lasted forever. The moment my PS3 stopped working for a day because PS3 didn't recognize February 29 as an actual day :)

If we had games nowadays performing like they did back then it would be outrageous i can tell you that much.

That said...Sony was experimental as fuck. Many of those games flopped but they were interesting. Plus, PS Home was something else. I also remember Uncharted 2 and Killzone 2 online modes. I spent MANY hours in there. LittleBigPlanet was addictive as hell as well. I always say MGS4 and LBP were the turning points for PS3 and still stand by that.

Also...the Buzz! games! Started on the PS2 but PS3 had those as well and the remotes were now wireless which was great.
It was rough, but at least it was rough for a reason. One could easily appreciate the leap in visuals, gameplay and QoL from PS2-PS3 back then. Fast forward to today where we're still having framerate and IQ issues, despite games barely looking any better than last gen. Where sequels take entire generations to launch and truly new/experimental gameplay is restricted to the indie market. Where console hardware is MORE EXPENSIVE than it was 4y ago and online is pretty much requried to do anything on them.

I can't say that I don't miss those simpler times...
 

Tams

Member
I remember the plan for Cell to be in fridges and stuff and they'd all talk to each other. It was pretty wild dreaming and there's been nothing like it in console since. That it still comes up and can still spark a hot debate 18 years later is something.

That's because (and it's much clearer now with hindsight, an example, and the console industry being more mature) a console is not the place to try out new technology like that.

Not, at least, if you want to make a short-medium term profit from it.
 

LordOfChaos

Member
That's because (and it's much clearer now with hindsight, an example, and the console industry being more mature) a console is not the place to try out new technology like that.

Not, at least, if you want to make a short-medium term profit from it.

Yep, agreed. A very interesting processor, but was it the right choice for a console with a very difficult first half for third parties to even get to parity level ports with the 360 and only a handful of games that arguably used it in a way that was perhaps above what the other console could do, probably not. Even that's arguable, we just don't know what Naughty Dog given unlimited budget to produce an Uncharted that ran on 360 from the ground up would have looked like.

It's still a shame to me that some of the late stage really using it well titles were just making up for the RSX and its lack of unified shaders and overall lesser performance, doing a lot of vertex pre-culling for it and stuff like that. I wonder what the Cell plus Xenos would have produced.
 
Last edited:

rofif

Can’t Git Gud
Nonsense. PS3 was very successful.
Being more cocky and sure of themselves is what they need now
 

Del_X

Member
"Oh it outsold the 360"
Yeah it also bled money like a stuck pig. They nearly eroded all profit made from the prior two generations. It was definitely better than the 360 in the later half of the gen from a games-worth-a-damn perspective.
 
Xbox had a chance to overtake PlayStation in the seventh generation. The reason they didn't can be chiefly tied to the RROD fiasco. Microsoft shelled out $1.1 billion, with a B, on the cost of repairing and replacing faulty Xbox 360s. If they had not cheaped out on the construction of the 360, that is money they could have used to lock down more marketing, more third party exclusives, create more first party titles, possibly even acquire some more studios and IPs. Sony was on its back with the PS3 but the RROD situation blew up for them at the worst possible time, giving Sony the ability to recover by making changes to PS3, slashing prices, and teaching third party developers how to make their games not suck. Sony never let off the gas once the PS3 Slim came out, pushing out first party content aggressively and courting third party deals to keep themselves not only relevant, but competitive.

Late in the generation, PlayStation continued producing hit after hit while Xbox largely rested on its laurels in the games department, putting all of their focus on Kinect. As 2013 came and both platforms began revealing their successors, Xbox did almost everything wrong, including it seems stealing from the PS3 launch playbook. Most of 2013 Xbox could not buy itself good press and their biggest mouthpieces were shoveling the XB1 into a position where it was going to be stillborn. Sony capitalized on Xbox's exponential mistakes immensely, recapturing their place as the leader of console gaming and Xbox never recovered from the disastrous Xbox One launch.

There was a time when Xbox could have prevailed over PlayStation, but their internal mistakes allowed Sony to pick itself up from their own face plant with the PS3 launch. The rest was history.
 
Top Bottom