Does it matter? When I go to a restaurant and the food is cold I don't care whose fault it is. These details are irrelevant for the customer.
For some yes. Some would probably like to be correctly informed.
Well, if it was a hardware issue, like the game looking like The Matrix Demo and needing to lower resolution on any X080 or X800 card, one may say it's just that, makes sense, we cannot do much beyond upgrading or machines. Our fault and it's evident.
Changing the framerate in that file didnt help much and caused more stutters and graphics pop up. I also started getting weird artifacts in the SSR reflections. really weird stuff.
it turned out to be reflections;
forum.beyond3d.com
I'd just want my money back.For some yes. Some would probably like to be correctly informed.
I totally understand, you can't get refunded? I'm assuming you're unable. I'm sorry.
Never use the in-game limiter, always use the Nvidia control panel.
If I had to attach my first and last name to a product I produced, and my company didn't allow me enough time to properly make it, I'd leave the company. Pretty simple. Reputation is everything.
I respect that. But a lot of people aren't that way, I'd say majority aren't. It's a very, VERY common occurrence (much like crunch), unfortunately, but as a result no one looks down on such a thing in the industry. There are a LOT of cogs working in a studio to bring a project to completion, so folks attached to certain projects aren't automatically looked down on. Even if they're attached to projects that failed.
In that case they have to live with their reputation. This is the result of their choices. If you find a guy's name in the credits for this game, and others like it, I think conclusions can be drawn.
If you sell that software for Apple though and it doesn't run well, it's on you. Because you are charging your customers but not providing a good product (example, no idea if you sell your software on Apple).
wtf?
Set to epic to make sure I guess , I already refunded so no idea if they patch it or not .
Well, unfortunately i cant hit native 4k 40 fps at epic settings even with RT off. hovers around 35 fps. So close but so far. I will have to rely on FSR quality. Hoping it doesnt degrade the IQ too much. This whole epic=100% res scaling is really fucking with my head. I wonder what its doing with FSR Quality.
FSR overrides any kind of resolution scaling, I'm sure of it. To be fair, my problem FSR is ghosting here and there and fizzling in hair + disocclusion artifacts. This is the first time I actually bite the bullet and gave FSR a chance but nah, it is jank...
And they'll be fine, because it won't affect their reputation, that's not how that typically works in this industry. Lord knows I've worked with plenty of people that were attached to projects that "failed", never saw the light of day, companies that folded, etc. It's never the fault of a single person when issues happen, or a few. It's generally a much larger issue that revolves around the company, the communications, how things are handled, etc. But it also depends on the role, the individual's full background and experience, etc. A good interviewee can see through nonsense.
oh i thought you were using FSR this whole time. I honestly cant tell the difference between native 4k and fsr quality so i will stick to it and turn on RT and epic settings. 40 fps seems to be stable.
No, no, I'm using FSR too, I have to. (4K fsr balanced). My problem, VRAM goes jank at native 4K, so I also kind of have to. And 1440p/TAA/FSR simply looks so bad to a point I had to make peace with FSR artifacting. For me to get stable framerate at 4K/FSR balanced+ray tracing, 30 FPS is a must. :/
I'm not in the gaming industry. I do electrical design. If someone had a reputation for being a part of troubled projects, they would have a hard time finding work if the people hiring were in the know. In gaming, I could understand lower level people not being affected by such things, but what about the management decision makers? Curious.
Management could essentially. But there's just too many cogs for it to be a singular person, you know? It could be the fault of a collection of producers, project managers, QA leads/managers, etc. Maybe the board, maybe the partners, maybe the heads of the studio. Or it could just be because of poor communication between everyone. There are many, many potential faults, maybe a little bit of everything. But, no singular person is targeted unless they're absolutely known to have done some particular nasty things in office. I've heard too many stories about people with poor performance getting away with it for a long, long time. It just all depends on the studio.
