Technically 1 could be fixed to an extent. UI improvements and a proper map could help quite a bit I would think.
SonyTooFor those of you lingering on about steam player count being the most important metric ever, dont forget that games like Goose Goose Duck is the 10th highest ever at 700,000, Lost Ark peaked at 1.3M and Top 20 games like Capcom Stadium 1 and 2 games are top choices at almost 500,000 each.
If peak concurrent player counts are so important, then games like GoW at 73,000, Horizon at 56,000, R&C and 9,000 and Returnal at 7,000 must means these are the worst games ever. Vampire Survivors has a higher rating, more concurrent player count and all time peak count higher than any of these games. In fact, VS currently has a higher concurrent player count than all of these combined even if you include DG, Uncharted and Last of Us too. A 8-bit looking indie game has more players playing it now than all these combined.
Steam Charts · Most Played Games on Steam
High-resolution charts with concurrent player counts for all Steam games, including historic data and stats. View most played games on Steam. View Steam player counts.steamdb.info
I hope not. Reviewing bombing is so childish. Even when I hear it happen to games I don't even intend to play, it's cringe af.
Hmm.... way ahead. but wearing Power Armor is still fun in 76.
ZehDon
said, some of us are able to brute force through the issues, but plenty of others are quite vocal in the problems they are having when they have hardware that exceeds recommended.
Those are fake reviews.That's the worrying part. Telling folks to buy new hardware is probably one of the more arrogant comments I've heard from a studio in a while. Like
Todd said that the game is already optimezed for PC, time to upgrade atleast that 2 year old GPUThat's the worrying part. Telling folks to buy new hardware is probably one of the more arrogant comments I've heard from a studio in a while. Like
There are a lot of negative ratings from people who spent more than 80 hours in the game. Like this one:
They different starts, diff characters, ship builder, etc... and by the end realized the game isn't quite what they expected. Opinions can change in the course of a playthrough.There are a lot of negative ratings from people who spent more than 80 hours in the game. Like this one:
Dude played for 91 hours and said the game felt small and was upset that it only brought new experiences for 91 hours. Like what did they do for 91 hours in a small game? Some games are kind of fickle.
Game runs like shit "How do they know? Must be fake reviews!".
They are peasant, that is why.
Of course opinions can change. It just seems like masochism to continue to force yourself to play a game for that long if you don't feel like you're getting what you want from it.
Is that Thai?Oh sheeeit we in amber territory now boys
This is how the dude plays Bethesda and other games.There are a lot of negative ratings from people who spent more than 80 hours in the game. Like this one:
Dude played for 91 hours and said the game felt small and was upset that it only brought new experiences for 91 hours. Like what did they do for 91 hours in a small game? Some games are kind of fickle.
He has the balls of steel for enduring that much gameplay time. dude played that long in just 10 days.There are a lot of negative ratings from people who spent more than 80 hours in the game. Like this one:
Dude played for 91 hours and said the game felt small and was upset that it only brought new experiences for 91 hours. Like what did they do for 91 hours in a small game? Some games are kind of fickle.
This is how the dude plays Bethesda and other games.
91 hours and already done with it does say something.
Fallout 4 and Skyrim game time vs the achievements is something.This is how the dude plays Bethesda and other games.
91 hours and already done with it does say something.
What's a finanical terroist btw?
This is how the dude plays Bethesda and other games.
91 hours and already done with it does say something.
Skyrim without mods is like eating food without salt.
*mods*
fallout is at 71 so not far
I guess playing video games is his job or somethingThis is how the dude plays Bethesda and other games.
91 hours and already done with it does say something.
Nah, us PC gamers stick with one game for the rest of our lives like it's part of family.
I'll give you the honor
I think you need to go after Jimbo.
I'll give you the honor
You're telling me I can get paid for this shit?!
The epitome of the post Morrowind Bethesduh games. The more and more you play them, the worse and worse they get once the repetition sets in and the recognition of all the bland, generic, shit design becomes apparent once you have more experience with it.
They rely on mods to give you ultimate experience.
We are still waiting for the regulators approval before consuming the deal
Starfield 50% negativity is much better than fallout 76.
- Fallout 76 = 71.73% (27.54% negative reviews)
- Starfield = 73.43% (25.67% negative reviews)
you have great tasteYou're telling me I can get paid for this shit?!
I call BS. I am locked 60 fps in ultrawide 1440p with no issues with literally the same setup. 5950X, 3080 TI 32 GB RAM. 18 hours of play (more because I lost a few hours after I loaded a previous save to change some decisions)That's the worrying part. Telling folks to buy new hardware is probably one of the more arrogant comments I've heard from a studio in a while. Like
