llien
Member
Would Steam not allow it as is, without cutting scenes, if it was rated as 18+?Lots of people were easily patching the game, the devs just circumvented the Steam rules but apparently Valve found out and decided to ban the game.
Would Steam not allow it as is, without cutting scenes, if it was rated as 18+?Lots of people were easily patching the game, the devs just circumvented the Steam rules but apparently Valve found out and decided to ban the game.
I don't know, but I don't think so. The reason they do this is because lolis can be seen as pedo content which would be illegal, same reason why they banned that rape game a while agoWould Steam not allow it as is, without cutting scenes, if it was rated as 18+?
That's not really it. Valve claimed that the patches in question simply unlock content that is already present in the Steam release of the game, which the publisher says is not true. If games could simply be kicked off the store for letting players patch in content that violates Valve's rules then they'd have to get rid of Skyrim too.Lots of people were easily patching the game, the devs just circumvented the Steam rules but apparently Valve found out and decided to ban the game.
Well we will have to choose who we want to believe then.That's not really it. Valve claimed that the patches in question simply unlock content that is already present in the Steam release of the game, which the publisher says is not true. If games could simply be kicked off the store for letting players patch in content that violates Valve's rules then they'd have to get rid of Skyrim too.
Out of all the damn games out there...People who play this stuff must be so fucking weird.
Agreed also all owners of that game should be stealth banned so they only play online with other sick fucks. Kinda like gta5 did with trollsYes censorship is bad but come on, there are some games that shouldn’t be there in the first place. Like why the fuck would you make such “game”?
That's the thing. When it comes to this stuff, Valve targets Japanese games almost exclusively. Games disappear from the Store despite passing Valves initial content checks, or get blocked from release due to supposed content issues only to be made available later unchanged with an all-ages rating and no explanation given. Meanwhile, Steam is full of mostly Western-made porn shovelware that Valve doesn't seem to care about at all.Well we will have to choose who we want to believe then.
But steam allows a lot of sexual games and mods and I don't see the reason why they should ban this one in particular.
But why though? Everytime this happens we get replies like that. We aren't resetERA.Fire Emblem I think
Well It's explicitly written in the flavour text of the image linked, since that card comes from fire emblem heroesBut why though? Everytime this happens we get replies like that. We aren't resetERA.
Games disappear from the Store despite passing Valves initial content checks, or get blocked from release due to supposed content issues only to be made available later unchanged with an all-ages rating and no explanation given. Meanwhile, Steam is full of mostly Western-made porn shovelware that Valve doesn't seem to care about at all.
Either Valve has no real, definite content guidelines for what Japanese games they will and won't allow on their store, or they're refusing to share them with devs and publishers.
No man, the replies. We get these retarded ass replies every time we question selective censorship.Well It's explicitly written in the flavour text of the image linked, since that card comes from fire emblem heroes
I guess they can't be avoided.No man, the replies. We get these retarded ass replies every time we question selective censorship.
People throw the word 'censorship' around to easily...Valve is a company, not the government...they are free to decide what goes in their store and the developer is free to distribute their game direct to consumer or through other stores...this isn't censorship. At all.
Not in these cases, anyway. The Expression Amrilato, an educational visual novel about learning Esperanto, got blocked by Valve before its release despite containing no sexual content whatsoever aside from a bath scene and a kiss. I highly doubt anyone who isn't interested in the game had even heard about it before the release, so I don't think a flood of reports is to blame. Valve later decided to allow the game on the store with no content changes and an all-ages rating. I don't think they ever told anyone why they initially blocked its release.I don't think Valve has a strong content check, they get so many games uploaded that often times slips off them, and then unless the game is very "problematic?" ( I hate using this word), or it gets reported by loads of people, they just won't care at all.
Life is Strange 2 features an actual sex scene involving two underage teenagers that is more explicit that anything in the game I mentioned above. I don't recall that game being held back or getting pulled from the store after release.I am not sure but I don't know of any western sexual games that depicts underage/underdeveloped characters, but of course if there was a case like this someone might be more informed than me.
So they literally had depictions of underage sex in the files deployed through Steam and this thread is still decrying this as censorship?
lol
Man some of you are suss as hell.
Technically banning child porn is "censorship" you dolts... so maybe pick a different hill to die on.
It is another thread where people never read the fucking replies and say stupid shit nobody said. Called it LMAO.Is this another one of these threads where weebs attempt to argue that creepy loli shit is a fundamental human right?
No man, the replies. We get these retarded ass replies every time we question selective censorship.
I read the replies and saw people whining about selective censorship.It is another thread where people never read the fucking replies and say stupid shit nobody said. Called it LMAO.
And yet there are non-anime games that also have underage characters having sex and they aren’t banned. Oh, and even worse, in those non-anime games, those characters are depicted in more realistic human proportions.I read the replies and saw people whining about selective censorship.
What in the world makes you think I give a flying fuck about you attempting to distract away from the issue?
The issue is pedophilia. "Well it's SELECTIVE CENSORSHIP".. yeah they should ban pretty much all of these sick anime games, I agree..next?
Just in case you haven't noticed, the female characters in this game all have huge knockers. This is not a game for pedophiles. They are not "lolis". Not unless you're Jason Schreier, anyway.The issue is pedophilia. "Well it's SELECTIVE CENSORSHIP".. yeah they should ban pretty much all of these sick anime games, I agree..next?
I won't call you out on that.It is another thread where people never read the fucking replies and say stupid shit nobody said. Called it LMAO.
I also gotta question people who think anime drawings will have the same effect as actual child pornographic material...I don't like censorship, but I also gotta question anyone who is into pedo anime crap too. Can't imagine people who crave drawn images of underaged girls are going down a good path. Loli stuff is especially sick and disgusting considering they legitimately look like 12 yr olds.
I think it's one of the reason why animes are viewed bad.I don't like censorship, but I also gotta question anyone who is into pedo anime crap too. Can't imagine people who crave drawn images of underaged girls are going down a good path. Loli stuff is especially sick and disgusting considering they legitimately look like 12 yr olds.
Lolis are shit though.I think it's one of the reason why animes are viewed bad.
The biggest anime fetishes are the two opposites:
Lolis, and big boobs.
While big boobs are viewed acceptable because it's a sign of a developed body/girl, the opposite is not true, because lolis are viewed as children and depiciting them as sexual object can rise many objections and gives a bad image.
New UN Guidelines Recommend Banning Sexual Loli Material in Anime, Manga
The United Nations is a forum for diplomatic discussions and a place to check-and-balance countries around the world. Within the prestigious organization, there are sub-units who perform studies on all sorts of social matters, and a recent recommendation has gotten some anime fans riled up...comicbook.com
Ah yes, just make your childish faced high school freshmen have huge knockers and suddenly it's totally not about fucking kids.Just in case you haven't noticed, the female characters in this game all have huge knockers. This is not a game for pedophiles. They are not "lolis". Not unless you're Jason Schreier, anyway.
While I don't like censorship, I welcome all eradication of perverted weeb shit. GUD!
Your nickname fits perfectly with your post I'd saySexual deviants are getting sent to the sea in less than a decade with extreme prejudice.
"But decontamination silo, are you just gonna throw people in the sea because of the sexual proclivities?"
Abso-fucking-lutely. And history will smile upon us for doing so.
You can't ban kids playing the war but you can ban adults playing with kids, after all that's how in real life works tooSo if we break down some games to their essence, the message becomes:
Murder = acceptable
Pedo = not acceptable
Both illegal.
I’m not into the pedo games, but if we’re going to be honest, when politicians try to ban a game because of its violence, the outcry is ”its a video game! Of course it’s not real!”. Stuff like that. So how is this any different?
Playing devil’s advocate.
I think there is already one which is fairly popular, not sure if they publish them there too or why they don'tSomeone should start a launcher/store for these kinds of games. I'm sure people would like a discreet seperate place from their steam account too so people don't see if they want to hide it.
In the real world murder and pedo are illegal, but in the digital world, one gets a pass.You can't ban kids playing the war but you can ban adults playing with kids, after all that's how in real life works too
I think I already answered you, I'll try to elaborate some more.In the real world murder and pedo are illegal, but in the digital world, one gets a pass.
If we look at it objectively, is this hypocritical?
Not comparable at all. Murdering someone can be justified. The other? Fuck no. You can see the error in your logic right?In the real world murder and pedo are illegal, but in the digital world, one gets a pass.
If we look at it objectively, is this hypocritical?