Was the new 3ds next gen too at that time? The base 3ds couldn't run XenobladeIf it was a switch pro all the games would run on the og switch.
It’s impossible to define “next-gen”. It’s different for everyone and it always has been.No, you suggesting that we talk about what we “feel” is next-gen or not is by far the stupidest thing possible.
Without a common definition there’s no discussion to be had here and no way to move forward.
You said you don’t believe the NVIDIA metric so I asked you to provide a metric you believe in to get an answer.It’s impossible to define “next-gen”. It’s different for everyone and it always has been.
You and every other Nintendo fan (who haven’t even played the console yet btw) are desperately trying to elevate the power of the system so that it isn’t, once again, perceived as the underpowered console for kids. You are doing so by holding on to a statement from a GPU manufacturer who has not only outright lied about the capabilities of their tech in the past, who’s sole responsibility it is to make their tech sound as industry leading and cutting edge as possible.
We have that statement alongside those from an outlet that focuses on pixel and frame counting. They are saying that every game shown fell into the 1080p/30 1440p/30 realm with Cyberpunk displaying at 540p/30.
So again, what objective truth is to be had here? Where is that indisputable definition that is somehow going to bring reason to the opinion-based conversation that has raged on since the beginning of console history?
Cool - so ignore the DF analysis.You said you don’t believe the NVIDIA metric so I asked you to provide a metric you believe in to get an answer.
It’s not like the NVIDIA metric is the ”objective truth” about anything being next-gen or not. But it sure as hell is a better measure than what you or me personally find impressive or not. There needs to be comparable quantifiable baseline, otherwise the discussion is utterly pointless.
But hey, lets just throw in whatever.. The Switch 2 comes with built in PC controllers so I’d say it’s a gen ahead of Ps5.
![]()
If you consider discussing and arguing based on opinions as a good thing more power to you. Have fun with that.Cool - so ignore the DF analysis.
For someone so desperate for irrefutable truth, you seem to cherry pick as much as anyone. Good job, you win man-child!
Was there a different expectation when it comes to what it should’ve/could’ve been?It's a leap for a 6 years old console, but nothing else really.
They closed the gap with the PS4 but we are in the middle of the gen of the PS5 (and PS5 Pro).
Let's be real.
Was the new 3ds next gen too at that time? The base 3ds couldn't run Xenoblade
No, it has not.The CPU is the series S is has more compute than the ps5.
It would. In an alternate reality where a single GPU metric scales perfectly with "performance".Isn't it 10x performance of NSW?
That would equal a 18tf PS5 when taking the base PS4 as a a metric.
Nothing heated about the conversation. Two opinions, neither of them valid or invalid.If you consider discussing and arguing based on opinions as a good thing more power to you. Have fun with that.
The only point I wanted to make was that I find it utterly pointless for someone to say ”I didn’t find this and that impressive so it’s obviously not next gen!” while someone else can say ”I find that and this super impressive so it is obviously next gen!”.
It’s not really a jab at you if that’s what you thought. I guess we can just end it there. Sorry if you felt things got too heated, wasn’t intentional.
Yes, it has does.No, it has not.
And the worst part is that some of them thinks they are right…People are completely out of their mind if they believe this isn't a big jump from the OG Switch.
Series S CPU is running at 3.4 GHz with SMT while PS5's is at 3.5 GHz with SMT, how is this resulting in XSS CPU having "more compute" exactly? If we are talking about real world compute throughput there are also other facets to consider besides this elementary aspect, like I/O reserves, interconnect latencies, API differences etc.Yes, it has does.
Xbox Series S uses the same CPU as the Xbox Series X running at 3.6GHz.
- Xbox Series S CPU:
- 8 cores
- 3.6 GHz clock speed (3.4 GHz with SMT)
- Custom AMD Zen 2 CPU
- PlayStation 5 CPU:
- 8 cores
- Variable frequency, up to 3.5 GHz
- Custom AMD Zen 2 CPU
![]()
Xbox Series S CPU is Faster Than the PS5's
A source reveals that Microsoft is using the same CPU for both the Xbox Series S and X, making both consoles able to perform faster than the PS5.gamerant.com
Yes, it has does.
Xbox Series S uses the same CPU as the Xbox Series X running at 3.6GHz.
- Xbox Series S CPU:
- 8 cores
- 3.6 GHz clock speed (3.4 GHz with SMT)
- Custom AMD Zen 2 CPU
- PlayStation 5 CPU:
- 8 cores
- Variable frequency, up to 3.5 GHz
- Custom AMD Zen 2 CPU
![]()
Xbox Series S CPU is Faster Than the PS5's
A source reveals that Microsoft is using the same CPU for both the Xbox Series S and X, making both consoles able to perform faster than the PS5.gamerant.com
That’s leaving out the whole up to 3.5ghz. As I said it has more compute power. Anyhow this is besides the main point I making stating that the switch 2 cpu side won’t be comparable.Series S CPU is running at 3.4 GHz with SMT while PS5's is at 3.5 GHz with SMT, how is this resulting in XSS CPU having "more compute" exactly? If we are talking about real world compute throughput there are also other facets to consider besides this elementary aspect, like I/O reserves, interconnect latencies, API differences etc.
PS5 CPU is running at 3.5 GHz most of the time with occasional minor drops, that is the default frequency in a sense. Besides this i agree, Switch 2 CPU should be much less powerful based on leaks and this will undeniably make an impact in CPU intensive scenarios.That’s leaving out the whole up to 3.5ghz. As I said it has more compute power. Anyhow this is besides the main point I making stating that the switch 2 cpu side won’t be comparable.
For some yeah it could have been different and for others it fits the bill.Was there a different expectation when it comes to what it should’ve/could’ve been?
Its not more powerful than a Series S. At all.It's obviously quite a bit more powerful than a ps4 and even a series s so I would say yes.
cyberpunk and streetfighter 6 beg to differ.Its not more powerful than a Series S. At all.
It has more modern architecture, but the power draw is lower.cyberpunk and streetfighter 6 beg to differ.
For some yeah it could have been different and for others it fits the bill.
But whatever "side" you are we're not talking about "next-gen".
You are right and yet I think it is comparable to the stationaries (I like that term) in so far as getting competitive and competent versions of yet to be released games.I don`t get the discussion....
Ofc it`s a next gen device if you look at Nintendo`s ecosystem.
And as a handheld it`s not comparable to the stationaries anyways....