DeepEnigma
Gold Member
So much negativity. You people are the worst. Keep it up!
So much negativity. You people are the worst. Keep it up!
They don't need more money to make character animation bettter than PSone/PS2 level...that's amateurish stuff anyone into game development should be able to make it work properly, and in fact tons of low-budget games have done it much better.This a studio Microsoft needs to purchase honestly. Love to see what they could do with a real budget and fully staffed up. They would fill a nice hole in the line up and would be a small studio they could grow into something. They seem to have great ideas just need the budget for execution. I'll be playing it this weekend.
Not sure if that's a good idea. I oftentimes see the xbox fanbase complaining about Sony "walking simulators" so idk why they'd be interested in ninja theory or Blunder TeamThis a studio Microsoft needs to purchase honestly. Love to see what they could do with a real budget and fully staffed up. They would fill a nice hole in the line up and would be a small studio they could grow into something. They seem to have great ideas just need the budget for execution. I'll be playing it this weekend.
They also made Layers of Fear and Blaire Witch. Both were poor. I was giving them the benefit of the doubt for this one just for the SH influences. I'm sad to hear it's just OK.
Has there been another game recently which had such disparity between review scores?, i cant think of one.
Without knowing the trickery behind how it’s done you are still loading up twice the amount of things on some objects which is why it drops in quality....would love to see how it’s made as it’s pretty clear it’s1. Nope. It's effectively one game and when entering the spiritual world, it's the same scene but with different assets, lighting, and other underlying graphical effects. 2 different versions of the game at the same time would be a heavy task even for 3090. Maybe impossible.
2. How about Opencritic then?
Lots of you must enjoy paying full price for games that are mediocre and 5 hours long
People do realise that
- This isn’t a first party title
- The game is effectively rendering 2 games at once
- Xbox/pc users don’t have to pay a cent if they have gamepas
Without knowing the trickery behind how it’s done you are still loading up twice the amount of things on some objects which is why it drops in quality....would love to see how it’s made as it’s pretty clear it’s
Reminds me of the Great titanfall 2 level
As for opencritic/metacritic....they are all just as horrible ways to measure games
Myself coming from a time where there was no internet and access to game magazines for reviews were out of sync by months sometimes playing these games blind was sometimes how you discovered some great games and I think gamepass in a way brings back that sort of mystery and does not punish your wallet
discovering and loving the yakuza series (yakuza zero)in the last week I never got into as I thought it was too Japanese has been a great example of game pass letting people to try games they probably pass over based on reviews
reviewers these days are lazy and almost always tainted by sponsorships/click baits or strict clauses for reviewing games and this feeds into any site that collates these reviews and projects a game as good or bad based on a score and not how it might appeal to the individuals playing it
As many have said...a game that rates in the mixed range would be a great game years ago based on reviews.
It's almost like people have different tastes. People who vibe with the atmospheric horror thing apparently like the game. People who are too edgy to enjoy atmospheric horror don't like the game. This is by the way the reason why Silent Hill is dead, it's too niche.Now see here. This is why I can't be arsed to trust reviewers anymore.
The OP has 9's and fucking 10's for this game. 9's and 10's is like game of the generation type scores.
Is this game really GOTG?
the problem is games are not being reviewed based on their merit...you are most likely taking someone opinions which are heavily influenced by outside factorsI am baffled by your logic here. Games needs to stand on their own merits. Just because someone can get it for "free" on the gamepass doesnt't mean its worth someone's spending 10 + hours if it ain't any good. I am not saying this game is bad (haven't played it) just interested in your logic/justification.
Regards
Niche divisive game is rated lower than a family friendly game in the safest genera ever? wowza
A game with a bigger budget and Sony endorsement running on the in-house Decima engine.Even Until Dawn got a 79 score with more reviews.
both are not bad games......but if we go off the reviews they are not very goodA game with a bigger budget and Sony endorsement running on the in-house Decima engine.
This is what they got with a smaller budget:
The Dark Pictures Anthology: Man of Medan Reviews
DON'T PLAY ALONE - From the developers of Until Dawn..Enter the world of The Dark Pictures - A series of standalone cinematic horror games. Players will be challenged to explore and uncover each story with the knowledge that all their choices have consequences and all playable characters can...www.metacritic.com
3/10 - 10/10
There's some fuckery going on here, reviewers are cunts,
If you ask me, I would ban reviewers giving 2/10 or 3/10 to games which are not completely broken. Often these are clickbait... I mean, if you don't like the Game is fine, you don't like the story, or a particular type of gameplay or gameplay mechanics, it is fine. But still, is graphics, sound, controls, gameplay mechanics completely broken in this Game, or the Story utter trash ? I don't think so, and I find this unprofessional. 2/10 or 3/10 should mean the Game is unplayable, broken, with crappy graphics and sound, a pure mess from every point of view. It can't be = ""I don't like the game"" -----> 3/10
But that doesn't have sense. I mean, I dont't like sport games, a review of FIFA from me will be bad for sure, but is that a proper review? I understand the first requisite to review a game is at least to like the type of game, if not, how can anybody trust that review?It's almost like people have different tastes. People who vibe with the atmospheric horror thing apparently like the game. People who are too edgy to enjoy atmospheric horror don't like the game. This is by the way the reason why Silent Hill is dead, it's too niche.
People do realise that
- The game is effectively rendering 2 games at once
The game is effectively rendering 2 games at onc. Without knowing the trickery behind how it’s done you are still loading up twice the amount of things on some objects which is why it drops in quality....would love to see how it’s made as it’s pretty clear it’s
Sounds like Death Stranding3/10 - 10/10
There's some fuckery going on here, reviewers are cunts,
I've asked this before when someone said this. Source that it's a timed exclusive. I keep seeing people say thisIt was never going to be this game. This is just a timed-exclusive indie walking simulator like Blair Witch, which will eventually come to all platforms.
It not an Xbox game though it might be console exclusive but it not made or published by Xbox just like Godfall is not a Sony game since it not made or publish by Sony lol
Until Dawn is a national treasure.Called this after watching the trailer.
You guys always full of excuses huh? Even Until Dawn got a 79 score with more reviews.
Until Dawn Reviews
Rebuilt and enhanced for PS5 consoles and PC - Until Dawn invites you to relive the nightmare, and immerse yourself in a gripping slasher horror where every decision can make the difference between life and death.www.metacritic.com
I've asked this before when someone said this. Source that it's a timed exclusive. I keep seeing people say this
Source?It's the same situation as their last game, Blair Witch.
Source?
As fans already know, it is going to be a timed exclusive for Xbox Series X & S
Nah. When you have bangers like Horizon ZD, Spiderman, Uncharted, Last of Us, Ghost of Tsushima, Demon's Souls etc. you don't have to play pretend. The Order, Until Dawn, Days Gone, and Death Stranding are just the butter in between the steak and potatoes at the playstation dinner table.Sigh.
Microsoft fanboys need to wise up, Sony fanboys have a winning strategy - middling review scores, average game, multiple people must only repeatedly post the words ‘underrated’ and ‘my GOTY’ over and over until it sticks (see The Order, Until Dawn, Days Gone, Death Stranding etc’).
If it doesn’t stick, just keep going. For years if necessary. Learn how to hype.
If you ask me, I would ban reviewers giving 2/10 or 3/10 to games which are not completely broken. Often these are clickbait... I mean, if you don't like the Game is fine, you don't like the story, or a particular type of gameplay or gameplay mechanics, it is fine. But still, is graphics, sound, controls, gameplay mechanics completely broken in this Game, or the Story utter trash ? I don't think so, and I find this unprofessional. 2/10 or 3/10 should mean the Game is unplayable, broken, with crappy graphics and sound, a pure mess from every point of view. It can't be = ""I don't like the game"" -----> 3/10