vaibhavpisal
Member
Funny to see GAF going ball deep in sales discussions (totally worthless to gamers), then crying about some of the outcomes.
Richard is finding XSS consoles for very cheap on the FB market place. Bought one for £65.
Funny to see GAF going ball deep in sales discussions (totally worthless to gamers), then crying about some of the outcomes.
They need products that act as a test-bed for their cameras, that's why Sony continue to make phones. It also helps with the R&D of those image sensors.
What hardware does Xbox (Xbox, not Microsoft) make that they sell to other businesses in the industry? If Xbox consoles are not selling to consumers, what justification do they have to keep Xbox hardware around?
Sales are so pointless to gamers, that we hear rumors of MS possibly bringing Xbox 1st party to competing platforms, like Playstation.Funny to see GAF going ball deep in sales discussions (totally worthless to gamers), then crying about some of the outcomes.
Isn’t Microsoft selling millions of their Xbox consoles to consumers?
Microsoft doesn’t make hardware that they sell to others in a particular industry, they sell software. I gave you the example so you can grasp it conceptually, not literally.
Why are you thinking of Xbox as its own entity?
Sales are so pointless to gamers, that we hear rumors of MS possibly bringing Xbox 1st party to competing platforms, like Playstation.
Maybe, but low sales can change the direction MS is going to take. Which affects the end-user.Needs to be seen how they approach it.
Low console sales were already predicted by Phil. Doesn’t seem to be an issue to them.
I swear, that statement, and that kinda talk... is the most deluded kinda reasoning I see amongst those that speak in defence of Xbox.Needs to be seen how they approach it.
Low console sales were already predicted by Phil. Doesn’t seem to be an issue to them.
When 3rd parties start skipping their consoles because of low install base (and being forced to make XSS and XSX versions), like already happened with Octopath Traveler 2 and FF7 part 1, he should consider it an issue.Needs to be seen how they approach it.
Low console sales were already predicted by Phil. Doesn’t seem to be an issue to them.
We'll get the 2023 top 20 with numbers, Hogwarts should be number 1.Do we get yearly sales? Hogwarts is at 22M, I wonder how it did in the UK.
This is what i had for November
PS5 - 240k
XBS - 132k
NSW - 113k
Total - 485k
For December we get this from MOM percentages:
PS5 - 194k (-19%%)
NSW - 157k (+39%)
XBS - 140k (+6%)
Total - 491k (+2%)
If we add October's estimates of 95k PS5, 41k XBS and 37k NSW then for FY Q3 (Oct, Nov & Dec) we get these totals:
PS5 - 529k
XBS - 313k
NSW - 307k
Total - 1149k
they should have spent money getting GTA VI and COD as exclusiveI don't think Microsoft was wrong to go after acquisitions. I just think the acquisitions they made did nearly nothing to help Xbox.
Blizzard and ABK are absolutely not the publishers that are going to move the needle for you, especially if you can't make CoD exclusive.
Going after Take2, CDPR, Capcom, FromSoftware, WB/ WBGames, Disney, these would have been needle movers. Hell, I think Ubi Soft would have been a better buy thank Bethesda.
they should have spent money getting GTA VI and COD as exclusive
Put out really good games the market wants
So….not Starfield?
You knew what you were doing when you cropped out the ‘…at a steady cadence’ part to change the context completely, eh?
they should have spent money getting GTA VI and COD as exclusive
How much of a steady cadence are they missing currently? This was their biggest year yet and they still had their console sales tank
We aren’t getting another Starfield sized release anytime soon
How much of a steady cadence are they missing currently? This was their biggest year yet and they still had their console sales tank
We aren’t getting another Starfield sized release anytime soon
Wait, hasn't Spider-man 2 kinda flopped (relatively compared to SM1)?
Funny to see GAF going ball deep in sales discussions (totally worthless to gamers), then crying about some of the outcomes.
They desperately want to be like Apple and have some sort of a consumer product out there, which is why they’ve had all of these side projects, out of which Xbox is the only one that stuck, and Sony just happened to be in that particular industry.
You could argue that they’ve had some success with their Surface line of mobile devices, but it’s obviously not enough for their corporate ego.
Redfall was a miss, and Forza disappointed critically and didn’t resonate with players.
That’s certainly not a ‘cadence of really good games’, unless you’re saying you’ve been trolling here for months.
Do those phones sell at a loss?
This documentary, which chronicles Xbox history, says Microsoft entered the console business because they were afraid of Sony taking over the living room with PS2. People that worked on the OG Xbox, even MS upper management , are saying that Playstation is the main reason why Xbox exists.
You think Xbox's hardware sales problems would clear up if they had a better cadence of big 1P AAA games?
IMO at this point the problem runs much deeper than that. Day 1 PC cannibalizing value proposition of the console. Multiple years of lackluster big 1P industry-leading, mega-mainstream releases (getting licenses for stuff like Blade are a decent step in fixing that, but said game is many years off and will likely be multiplat anyway)*. Too many fingers in too many pies that are in conflict with each other in some ways (Xbox consoles, PC Day 1, Game Pass xCloud streaming on various devices as key examples).
*And I do NOT mean quality-wise here. I've always said MS has some good games, very good games in some cases. Like Flight Sim, Forza Horizon, the Ori games etc. But that clearly doesn't mean those games are also mega-mainstream or in some cases even industry-leading. SEGA had tons of great games during Saturn era too like Shining Force 3, Panzer Dragoon series, VF2 etc. but for various reasons none of them had the mainstream selling power/"magic" of games like FF VII, Resident Evil, Tekken, etc. on PS1 or Super Mario 64 and Smash Bros. on N64.
That and things like conditioning more console owners to spend less in B2P purchases relative competitors, and other things I've not mentioned here, are the problems with the Xbox brand today. And it'd take many years before the negative effects of those things could really be reversed. Years, most likely, well beyond what timeframe Microsoft would want to dedicate towards them, just to maybe get console hardware sales going in a positive trajectory again, when that effort could be much better spent on multiplatform publishing and expanding into markets like mobile.
People just need to give up on this dream that Xbox can still compete head-on with PlayStation and Nintendo, because it seems like Microsoft Gaming has internally done so and are shifting into a new direction, gradually. But at least gaming hardware will still play some part in that new direction. It's just very likely not going to be as a traditional console (i.e operating on that type of business model), and I'm gonna stand by that assertion.
That's very interesting.. I will watch it because I'm curious to see why Microsoft would care about the "living room" in the first place
As far as I am aware, only Xbox Series consoles are selling at a loss this gen ($100-200). PS5 hasn't since mid-2021.Aren't consoles an exception when it comes to selling at loss?
I think they will sell more consoles than they're currently selling if their platform has a steady stream of excellent games. Games sell hardware.
I'm not sure where you got the idea that I believe they'd outsell the PlayStation. That ship has long sailed, especially with them releasing their games on PC Day 1...and with even entry level PCs being more capable daily. But your assumption that they have a problem as long as they don't sell more than Sony isn't based on logic. #1 in console sales isn't the only metric for success.
I swear, that statement, and that kinda talk... is the most deluded kinda reasoning I see amongst those that speak in defence of Xbox.
That they are doing fine, that everything is ok, that its not an issue, that if something was wrong we would know.
Are you guys living under a rock is this literal proof that copium exists?
- so if I tell you, I am going to fail an exam, then it's fine when I fail it?
- its not an issue for them yet they do not announce any kinda hardware sales data
- they are trying to bring their games to other platforms
- they are fire-selling their three-year-old hardware at a time when their primary rival is increasing its price, and still coming in thrid
- they are spending more money on acquisitions in one year than they have made in their division's profits for over 20 years.
And you think they really think they don't have an "issue"... I hope for their sake they aren't thinking like you.
They're way past that point.If he can predict sales will go down, he also knows why is that the case. Knowledgeable and knows sales much better
Getting my point?
I don’t buy into this idea they cannot increase sales even if they wanted to. The way they market and release games, it ensures their sales don’t explode.
Why are we changing history?Needs to be seen how they approach it.
Low console sales were already predicted by Phil. Doesn’t seem to be an issue to them.
CESA 2012-2022 UK sales: credit to Asrtral02_lion from InstallBase
Lol Market literally hasn't grownCESA 2012-2022 UK sales: credit to Asrtral02_lion from InstallBase
Not yet as all the marketing still at Sony's side.obtained COD and others,
I'm 100% sure Spencer was put in place to oversee the transition to 3rd party if this gen would be worse than last-gen.Some of you guys are on some strong copium when it comes to Xbox console sales numbers and thinking they're fine.
Console with low install base = less developers willing to make a version of their game for the platform = Microsoft has to pay the big bucks to compensate for it and get the game ported anyways.
Same thing with marketing deals: if you are not the market leader, it'll cost you much more. Or do you not think Atlus/Sega are not getting big monies for Persona 3 Reload and Metaphor?
That's the exact reason Microsoft started acquiring studios back in the Xbox One days. It realized playing catch up was starting to get very expensive, and that it was better to just buy the studios outright than to pay absurd fees to get anything.
Factor in all that and realize that this gen is doing even WORSE numbers than the previous one, making those previously talked about fees even more steep. We are about to witness Microsoft either doubling down on studio acquisitions and going on another spree or start making the moves to eventually go 3rd party at least in some capacity. Looking at the recent rumors, the latter is seeming more likely.
Shortages were pretty bad for PS5 in 2022, in 2023 sales were around 1.11M and that's with only 90% of the market tracked so actual sales were likely 1.22M which is around what the PS4 was selling each year at it's peak. Also we shouldn't forget that PS4 had a lightning fast start in the UK and was much cheaper than the PS5.Is this accurate?
Both PS5 and Series being down in UK vs last gen? Wha?
As far as I am aware, only Xbox Series consoles are selling at a loss this gen ($100-200). PS5 hasn't since mid-2021.
Microsoft Loses Between $100-$200 On Every Xbox It Sells
Xbox boss Phil Spencer says the company recoups the losses by selling accessories and subscriptionskotaku.comSony’s $499 PS5 is no longer selling at a loss
The PS5 won’t be costly like the PS3.www.theverge.com
Really? So what's Hiroki Totoki talking about? We found Sonys Phil Spencer.From financial reports, it would seem the PS5 is still sold at a loss.
I'm a bit surprised Starfield isn't in the top 20, it includes PC/Xbox digital.
20 Grand Theft Auto Online (Rockstar) - Ew.
Really? So what's Hiroki Totoki talking about? We found Sonys Phil Spencer.
I honestly have no idea what MS can do at this point.