midnightAI
Member
Does that change the fact this is a crime though?
Should they ignore this because they didnt do their job properly previously? of course they shouldnt
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
[UK] Police investigate virtual sex assault on girl's avatar
- Thread starter cormack12
- Start date
Should they ignore this because they didnt do their job properly previously? of course they shouldnt
midnightAI
Member
What? so she isnt real now? a person wasnt there (a minor, under 16) to receive the abuse? what am reading?
Why on earth do you think this is being investigated?
Last edited:
It already is in the digital space regarding minors and indecency online, why wouldn't this extend to VR? That is probably why this is being investigated at all.
gaming_again
Member
I didn't say she wasnt real. Where are you getting that from?
It's being investigated because who ever is in charge of the police considers the internet to host greater threats than real life, because our institutions are obsessed with image over reality.
I'm never going to convince you and you won't convince me. We have a fundamentally different view of policing, criminality, and what the internet constitutes.
This is complete hogwash. This is like saying "why are you arresting me for stealing when some dude is probably murdering somebody somewhere. you must consider stealing a greater threat than murder!"
Last edited:
gaming_again
Member
No, it's because if I write something deemed offensive to somebody on Twitter, I am more liable to get into trouble than if I steal a bike outside of a gym. And it's not because it's easier for me to be traced.
If you can't see the obsession with image over reality in how information is presented to us today from institutions, then I don't know what to say. We occupy totally different mindsets. To my mind it is the primary story of the 2000s.
midnightAI
Member
Because you said 'This did not occur in real life', just because its in VR/or online is irrelevant, it was still said to a real human being (In this case a minor, which is the law that has been broken).
Last edited:
gaming_again
Member
It's not irrelevant because VR/online is not real life. It is fake and malleable and if we start treating it as a real life we're going to run into trouble at a civilisational scale.
midnightAI
Member
The people giving and subjected to the abuse are real though, in that sense there is no difference, just because you sit behind a keyboard. Otherwise you or I could go on a racist tirade, start saying whatever we wanted to underage kids, send death threats to anyone we wanted.
Dr.Morris79
Member
I guess you might want to look into your kids school library then..
Or is it okay if it's state sanctioned for 11+?
gaming_again
Member
Well I agree none of those are pleasant, but I don't know if you can class abusing somebody on the street and sending text messages to somebody as the same thing. I am uncomfortable with words being classed as abuse without there being a physically threatening element there as well.
I guess my 'what crime has been committed here' comment was wrong, because in the eyes of the law a crime was committed. I question if it should be a crime, though.
If we are going to step into VR in a big way, I want to see a proper discussion on the role of the firms, the regulators, parents, the online participants, and lastly, the law. I don't want us to transpose what we have now onto the digital space. I don't think it's suitable at all.
Last edited:
Optimus Lime
(L3) + (R3) | Spartan rage activated
The fact that there are people in this thread who are taking this seriously are so fucking funny to me.
There's a real easy way to fix this 'problem'. Show your kids where the 'off' switch is and teach them how to use it.
Touch grass, you clowns.
There's a real easy way to fix this 'problem'. Show your kids where the 'off' switch is and teach them how to use it.
Touch grass, you clowns.
Where is the evidence for this? It seems to be all based on your dismay that another crime is being investigated. It's more akin to somebody telling you a stolen bike is being investigated and you trying to suggest it isn't a crime because murder is more serious. What would you rather? "We are not investigating your reported crime because there are more serious crimes out there".
midnightAI
Member
Is that directed as abuse at the child? come on now, dont be silly, or any word could not be used as abuse as its written down somewhere as informational textI guess you might want to look into your kids school library then..
Or is it okay if it's state sanctioned for 11+?
(and I' pretty sure my child has never read that book, and any books of that nature require permission from the parent)
Last edited:
gaming_again
Member
It's that I don't consider rude words to be worthy of police time.
Evidence is in the numerous counts of people being investigated for online actions every day versus the ballooning real life crime stats.
You are framing my argument as a zero-sum approach to police resources but that isn't what I'm saying. Triage regarding crime isn't a bad argument in and of itself, though. But I'm not saying that.
Dr.Morris79
Member
I think you've missed the point slightly..
The problem isn't the fact of turning the computer 'off', it's the fact the police are 'investigating' it in the first place..
You know, while real people are being killed, daily. Grooming gangs rape kids, daily. Imported drug dealers operate with impunity, using kids, daily.
You know, real things. That police pretend don't happen.
midnightAI
Member
Yes, they are stopping all other investigations to all solve this case.
(by the way, most cases like this are done by the Cyber Crimes unit (and CEOP), you know, employing more staff to help prevent crimes like this)
Last edited:
Dr.Morris79
Member
An 11 year old can go home, stick things up their bum without the parents knowing (Because the book says it's okay), causes damage and it's fine.. no worries, it's informational anyway
That book was in my kids school library, for 11+. Any kid could take it. My son brought it home as he couldn't believe it himself and he was working in the library dealing with all books, he was 13
If you want to pretend these things are not happening, go ahead
But they are.
Yet you've still provided no data on any of this. The fact that other crimes occur doesn't mean they are not given priority over online actions. You don't even know how much police time has been allocated to any of this. The only thing you know is that this crime is being investigated. That's all you seem to be dismayed by for some reason.
midnightAI
Member
Its still very different to adult strangers telling your children they would like to shove their bits inside your childrens bums don't you think? (and no, I dont think that book should be allowed, like I said, when my children where that age they had to send permission forms to us to sign before they could participate in any lesson that talked about sex ed. (there were also no books in their library of that nature, or at least not that i'm aware of, in that instance the school should have been notified of its content, but the school my kids went to were very strict on anything of that nature without permission, same went with any photographs no matter how innocent such as school trips)An 11 year old can go home, stick things up their bum without the parents knowing (Because the book says it's okay), causes damage and it's fine.. no worries, it's informational anyway
That book was in my kids school library, for 11+. Any kid could take it. My son brought it home as he couldn't believe it himself and he was working in the library dealing with all books, he was 13
If you want to pretend these things are not happening, go ahead
But they are.
Last edited:
gaming_again
Member
Correct, I'm not going to go around digging up stats. This is an online discussion, not work. There are plenty of them that back up my point.
I've explained what my 'some reasons' are many times. You are using faux naivety and misunderstanding to dismiss my point in an effort to make it look ridiculous instead of outright saying you think it's ridiculous. It's an insincere and boring technique.
justiceiro
Marlboro: Other M
Sooo.. case closed?
midnightAI
Member
It will be the verbal abuse the child suffered not anything visual, its still the correct course of action to investigate it due to the nature of the alleged abuse and their age even if nothing comes of it.
Last edited:
Dr.Morris79
Member
To even think we have to have this conversation is crazy in itself. Of course it's wrong, it's all bloody wrong, it's been going wrong for years and we're seeing the results
Sexualising an avatar? The police getting involved? Kids involved? Weird books in school. The whole premise itself is just odd
We're fucked aren't we. Rabbit hole after rabbit hole of utter weird shit with no end in sight.
All I can say is I'm trying to bring up someone in the next generation that isn't a weirdo, infact, he's probably the most well rounded human I know.
That's all I can do now and hope it doesn't get to him
You suggested your perception was evidence already and now refuse to provide data when I asked. There is nothing insincere about what I'm saying. I sincerely don't understand why you're up in arms about this lesser crime being investigated just because more serious crimes exist or occur. Those aren't being ignored for this and you've provided nothing to suggest they are.
midnightAI
Member
Thats all you can do, and yes, the world is getting weirder, and everyone is offended by everything (that does my nut in, sometimes it is warranted but 90% of the time people just want to complain about something, anything, guess that's why I like Ricky Gervais)To even think we have to have this conversation is crazy in itself. Of course it's wrong, it's all bloody wrong, it's been going wrong for years and we're seeing the results
Sexualising an avatar? The police getting involved? Kids involved? Weird books in school. The whole premise itself is just odd
We're fucked aren't we. Rabbit hole after rabbit hole of utter weird shit with no end in sight.
All I can say is I'm trying to bring up someone in the next generation that isn't a weirdo, infact, he's probably the most well rounded human I know.
That's all I can do now and hope it doesn't get to him
winjer
Gold Member
There is something very wrong with a country that allows real rape cases to just be dropped due to delays, but wastes time with non-sense like this.
Nearly 70% of rape victims drop out of investigations in England and Wales
Exclusive: MoJ statistics unearthed by Labour as party presses Rishi Sunak to improve conviction rates
www.theguardian.com
Nearly 70% of rape victims drop out of investigations in England and Wales
Exclusive: MoJ statistics unearthed by Labour as party presses Rishi Sunak to improve conviction rates
www.theguardian.com
ChuckeRearmed
Member
Should have said that he was palestinian or something
Banjo64
cumsessed
Can you please point to me where in UK law it says your digital avatar can’t invade the personal space of another persons digital avatar?
midnightAI
Member
Again, you are only picking that part of the story, they verbally abused her, she's under 16, a minor. Stop thinking about it as just an Avatar, a real (young) person was subjected to the verbal (and in this case sexual) abuse.
(and I agree, in this instance the visual aspect should be ignored if what they were playing at the time has no realistic interpretation of the human body or body parts)
Last edited:
midnightAI
Member
So crimes less than rape shouldn't be investigated? Just because one part of the judicial system is screwed up doesn't mean you stop investigating lesser crimes.There is something very wrong with a country that allows real rape cases to just be dropped due to delays, but wastes time with non-sense like this.
Nearly 70% of rape victims drop out of investigations in England and Wales
Exclusive: MoJ statistics unearthed by Labour as party presses Rishi Sunak to improve conviction rates
winjer
Gold Member
I think real crimes, should take precedence over imaginary ones over the internet.
BlackTron
Member
Damn you guys got Thought Police already?
midnightAI
Member
Right, 'imaginary', so she imagined the verbal abuse?
And you are assuming that this takes precedence because?
winjer
Gold Member
Do you really think that real cases of rape have no precedence over small things like this.
Your lack of priority and morals is staggering.
midnightAI
Member
Eh? I never said otherwise (I honestly dont know where you got that from), that does not mean that they shouldn't investigate this, they do have more than one police man/woman/branch/unit working on these cases you know.
Last edited:
Little Mac
Gold Member
Meanwhile kids have been ritualistically teabagging me in CoD for decades.
Last edited:
winjer
Gold Member
They are wasting time on misdemeanors, when real crimes are unsolved. This is completely unfair to victims of real rape, that have their cases dropped due to delays.
That has nothing to do with eachother though. This case could likely result in it being dropped due to court delays or low conviction rates too. Judges and Lawyers in courts aren't doing the jobs of police investigations.
Read the article
“Tory cuts have left too few courts, too few judges, too few lawyers and too many complainants unable to put their lives on hold to wait for justice"
Dropping this investigation would do nothing to help here. In fact it will likely result in that "dropped sexual offences" stat increasing if they dropped this. People are complaining just for the sake of complaining.
Last edited:
winjer
Gold Member
This affects the whole judicial system, if the police, judges and courts are bottleneck by misdemeanors. Especially when it's stupid crap said over the internet.
Meanwhile people are getting raped, robbed and stabbed, and the judicial system does nothing.
Bojji
Member
In Poland we really don't care about drunk people on the streets so he probably didn't expect any help, just some good nap. But you're a good person so thanks on his behalf.
To even think we have to have this conversation is crazy in itself. Of course it's wrong, it's all bloody wrong, it's been going wrong for years and we're seeing the results
Sexualising an avatar? The police getting involved? Kids involved? Weird books in school. The whole premise itself is just odd
We're fucked aren't we. Rabbit hole after rabbit hole of utter weird shit with no end in sight.
All I can say is I'm trying to bring up someone in the next generation that isn't a weirdo, infact, he's probably the most well rounded human I know.
That's all I can do now and hope it doesn't get to him
This is how rabbit hole looks like in 2024
Pretty much. Police should be solving crimes like this after they manage to catch people that were hurting others (including children) in reality. But they could be called racist or something so it's safer to do internet stuff.
Last edited:
winjer
Gold Member
Let's remember how the UK police ignore for many years, the real rape of real girls.
www.forbes.com
Why Did British Police Ignore Pakistani Gangs Abusing 1,400 Rotherham Children? Political Correctness
A story of rampant child abuse—ignored and abetted by the police—is emerging out of the British town of Rotherham. Until now, its scale and scope would have been inconceivable in a civilized country. Its origins, however, lie in something quite ordinary: what one Labour MP called "not wanting to...
www.forbes.com
midnightAI
Member
And as I have said before, cases like this go to the relevant department, in this case CEOP and/or Cyber Crimes Unit, this wont affect any other crimes unless it then goes to court (unlikely) and if it does go to court then they have a case worthy of going there.
winjer
Gold Member
That takes resources and personnel away from departments that investigate real crimes.
But even if we take only internet crimes, why waste time on nonsense like that when there are real crimes, of huge magnitude not being tackled with the importance they deserve?
Over £1.2 billion stolen through fraud in 2022, with nearly 80 per cent of APP fraud cases starting online
Read the latest news and insights from UK Finance: Over £1.2 billion stolen through fraud in 2022, with nearly 80 per cent of APP fraud cases starting online
Last edited:
midnightAI
Member
Right, so what you are saying is everyone can say whatever they want to whoever they want no matter the age with no repercussions online because you don't think its a real crime? (even though it is)
I don't care about all these other crimes you are bringing up, they are completely irrelevant separate cases dealt with by completely separate departments within and outside the police force. There is ZERO evidence that them ivestigating this case means that a physical rape case will be pushed to the side.
Last edited:
Red5
Member
No one should be above the law, if they broke a relevant law in the UK then they should be prosecuted.
This felony in particular falls on the Cybercrime division, which does not deal with real world rapes, so it does not take away any human resources from the relevant departments.