Kind of miffed at the problem found in the word "poor person". That word should not become more PG because it "hurts" people. That word should be used because it highlights a major problem in society where people are evoked and placed into that role which we know creates suffering, conflict, and constitutes the individual as a "have not" or a "less than". One is placed there: it's not earned, and has absolutely fuck all to do with choice and will, as its replacement words naively imply.
One doesn't simply "lack advantages" in that role. They are given disadvantages due to dangerously bad ideas, like being a have or else, which is the basic production of poverty in a developed nation. It's merely given to those who fail to match dangerous projections. Changing the word to imply that it's about advantages still plays the game of choice in society, but the original word addresses the fact that there are people in such positions, and more openly addresses the question of "what is poor" in our society, which is far more important than dick waving about advantages and disadvantages.
