Neuromancer
Member
Me gustaTaco Bell said:"Given the behavior of the individual, it is clear he can no longer work for us. We have also offered and encouraged him to seek professional help."
Me gustaTaco Bell said:"Given the behavior of the individual, it is clear he can no longer work for us. We have also offered and encouraged him to seek professional help."
Looks like he got fired; that didn't take long.
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/02/taco-bell-executive-out-after-alleged-assault-in-uber-car.html
According to his bio, Golden was a "seven-year veteran of Yum Brands," the parent company of Taco Bell. Golden was also described in the bio as "a southerner who enjoys mint juleps and horse racing."
Looks like he got fired; that didn't take long.
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/02/taco-bell-executive-out-after-alleged-assault-in-uber-car.html
alleged assault
Looks like he got fired; that didn't take long.
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/02/taco-bell-executive-out-after-alleged-assault-in-uber-car.html
The drunk works for Taco Bell corporate.
Uh oh.
Alcohol is such a stupid drug.
I'm curious too, executive sounds good but he's also in charge of the mobile division, so he may have been in charge of a bunch of interns.How much of a salary did this guy piss away? What kind of figures we talking about?
That drunk at 8 pm he was on some bender for some reason. Like they say though, play stupid games win stupid prizes.
To be expected.
Every cab I've ever been in has a plastic divider between the cabbie and the passengers.
Well for one thing the drivers head would have been protected from taking random violent slaps and punches. I know in Boston the Red cabs have always had them and they have often helped the drivers lock in belligerent violent passengers and drive them to nearby police stations.Scratched my head for three hours now and still have no idea what to make of this unless we're saying everyone should go about their business in a Perspex cube.
How much of a salary did this guy piss away? What kind of figures we talking about?
That drunk at 8 pm he was on some bender for some reason. Like they say though, play stupid games win stupid prizes.
It doesn't give the driver the ability to determine where you live - it gives you that button as a passenger. If you're too drunk to slur out where you live, I'm not sure how anybody should be able to magically help you at that point.
Step 1: Ask the passenger for his phone.
Step 2: Press the HOME button.
Step 3: ???
Step 4: Profit.
Step 1: Ask the passenger for his phone.
Step 2: Press the HOME button.
Step 3: ???
Step 4: Profit.
Well for one thing the drivers head would have been protected from taking random violent slaps and punches. I know in Boston the Red cabs have always had them and they have often helped the drivers lock in belligerent violent passengers and drive them to nearby police stations.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/01/15/ex-taco-bell-exec-now-suing-uber-driver-for-5-million.html
The ex-Taco Bell executive is now suing the Uber driver.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/01/15/ex-taco-bell-exec-now-suing-uber-driver-for-5-million.html
The ex-Taco Bell executive is now suing the Uber driver.
California's wiretapping law is a "two-party consent" law. California makes it a crime to record or eavesdrop on any confidential communication, including a private conversation or telephone call, without the consent of all parties to the conversation
So throw out the "conversation" part of it, and you're left with just the violence. I'm sure that will help him.California's wiretapping law is a "two-party consent" law. California makes it a crime to record or eavesdrop on any confidential communication, including a private conversation or telephone call, without the consent of all parties to the conversation
Wearing a backwards baseball cap pretty much cements this guy's loser status.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/01/15/ex-taco-bell-exec-now-suing-uber-driver-for-5-million.html
The ex-Taco Bell executive is now suing the Uber driver.
Because the Uber driver made him look bad?
EDIT:
There's also that issue about recording sound without consent though.
United States v Wahchumwah said:We are persuaded that it is not “constitutionally relevant” whether an informant utilizes an audio-video device, rather than merely an audio recording device, to record activities occurring inside a home, into which the informer has been invited. When Wahchumwah invited Agent Romero into his home, he forfeited his expectation of privacy as to those areas that were “knowingly expose[d] to” Agent Romero. Wahchumwah cannot reasonably argue that the recording violates his legitimate privacy interests when it reveals no more than what was already visible to the agent.
I can't believe the guy would want to keep this in the news spotlight. Take the loss and go away... Wow.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/01/15/ex-taco-bell-exec-now-suing-uber-driver-for-5-million.html
The ex-Taco Bell executive is now suing the Uber driver.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/01/15/ex-taco-bell-exec-now-suing-uber-driver-for-5-million.html
The ex-Taco Bell executive is now suing the Uber driver.