RedAssedApe
Banned
Looks like a constant 30 fps lock on PS4. Didn't sit through all 14 minutes, but I didn't notice any dip on randomly skipping every few minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SmhW_IqYt4
niceee...like ass4
Looks like a constant 30 fps lock on PS4. Didn't sit through all 14 minutes, but I didn't notice any dip on randomly skipping every few minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SmhW_IqYt4
He was telling the truth; not like those other liars.How is it most honest? What does that mean?
I collected some links from the bigger outlets if anyone finds it helpful:
Giantbomb - 3/5
IGN - 8.4/10
Joystiq - 4/5
Escapist (Jim Sterling) - 4.5/5
Gamespot - 8/10
Game Informer - 8.5/10
Destructoid - 8/10
PC Gamer - 87/100
Polygon - 8/10
Eurogamer - 7/10
Games Radar - 4/5
How is it most honest? What does that mean?
Please tell me you can hack a friend's world and type what you want on that sign.
Please tell me you can hack a friend's world and type what you want on that sign.
7 is too high for that game. Seriously. The game is generic in every way(Story,shooting etc) and only has one cool feature (hacking) that gets old fast enough (press x to hack, press x to hack).
A few people got new phones and now the game gets good scores.
Check the updated OP. Can't beat that![]()
Cos you can't send rude messages to your friends already? Just don't make it possible between strangers. Or if the game is already M rated (I dunno, I'm in Japan) then just let people get over it!That would be nice, but the potential for abuse is too high.
And that’s exactly what Watch_Dogs is all about: fun. You can sit in front of your TV for ten hours straight or just fire up your console for a ten minute spider tank trip, and you’ll leave satisfied. Watch_Dogs may not have the best story out there and certain elements may not be 100% perfect, but things mesh together in a beautifully large open world playground that will leave you wanting more, and will pretty much always have more to give.
A few people got new phones and now the game gets good scores.
Ubisoft: The Game.
7 is too high for that game. Seriously. The game is generic in every way(Story,shooting etc) and only has one cool feature (hacking) that gets old fast enough (press x to hack, press x to hack).
A few people got new phones and now the game gets good scores.
Crucially, you never actually feel like you're hacking anything. A lot of the time you're just pressing a button to make something happen, which at a functional level is no different to any action game. When you do get to actually hack into things at a system level, it's via a tired old PipeMania-style puzzle where you rotate pieces to guide a blue power line to a goal. If anything underscores how little interest the game has in using "hacking" as anything other than a marketable context for "making cool s*** happen", it's this.
Why would I not be okay? I said the game didn't deserve a 95 and its metascore is not 95. Take your concern trolling elsewhere.Is TheCloser okay? Is he on life support now? Will he live to watch the doges?
Did you play it?
Nice review Bloodworth! Cant wait to get this after work tomorrow. So much going on I will prolly only get to play for a few minutes :-(FYI, we do have text posted on our reviews too if you're interest in quotes for the OP. (or really don't want to watch the video) http://www.gametrailers.com/reviews/gq1zhv/watch-dogs-review
I guess the verdict is good not great, which seems like most expected. By now we are well aware of the outlets that are just part of the hype machine (IGN,, etc..) and those which are more concerned about assessing the game's merit (eurogamer, GB....).
Cos you can't send rude messages to your friends already?
(I dunno, I'm in Japan)
Is TheCloser okay? Is he on life support now? Will he live to watch the doges?
![]()
82 on Metacritic.
Sounds like GAF was pretty close in the guess the Metacritic thread.
Yeah I think they did a great job on that front.http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-watch-dogs-tech-analysis
DF PS4 analysis. Very stable 30 fps, only drops in very rare cases.
Can we not do stuff like this?So better than Infamous?
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-watch-dogs-tech-analysis
DF PS4 analysis. Very stable 30 fps, only drops in very rare cases.
Oh awesome, haha!Oh, you absolutely can, but that risk is on the platform holder, not Ubisoft.
Ditto. It's a small world. You're on my psn friends list. I know you from another forum.
Jim Sterling said:It has to be said - a baseball cap is not iconic if yet another growling photogenic white guy is underneath it. You can't just baseball cap your way into the history books, Ubisoft!
Oh no you didn't!!So better than Infamous?
So better than Infamous?