• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

WB Mulling BATMAN BEYOND Live Action Film - Rumour. But AWESOME Rumour.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dram

Member
What could work though? It's hard to find something that could be a success, that isn't connected to the big name heroes in anyway. Suicide Squad? Animal Man? Another Constantine maybe?

Because I still have no clue how they will sell GoG.
I'm sure they'll sell as the lead up to Avengers 2.
 

Ahasverus

Member
What could work though? It's hard to find something that could be a success, that isn't connected to the big name heroes in anyway. Suicide Squad? Animal Man? Another Constantine maybe?

It's actually very easy with complete unknown properties, the "mid tier", now that's difficult. You can make a Suicide Squad movie work because people don't know what it is, now making a Hawkgril movie, that's impossible.
 

benzy

Member
Oldbruce.jpg


5uLZgT1.jpg
 

ReiGun

Member
What could work though? It's hard to find something that could be a success, that isn't connected to the big name heroes in anyway. Suicide Squad? Animal Man? Another Constantine maybe?


I'm sure they'll sell as the lead up to Avengers 2.

I think it's easier to make unknown properties a success because the audiences have no expectations. A lot of the backlash Man of Steel has gotten is a result of it not meeting the expectations for what people think a Superman movie should be. (Mind you, that movie has still been a success at the box office and many people like it.)

With a property like Secret Six, for example, there's no expectation. It's an entirely new concept to most audiences. All they would need to do is put together a good cast/film and a decent ad campaign and people will turn out.

I think that's why DC is looking into properties like Sandman and Metal Men; their other famous characters like Wonder Woman and Aquaman are so dug into pop culture consciousness (and not in an entirely good way) that it might be worth it to try and elevate some lesser known ip. You can limit the budgets and potentially have a little more creative freedom.
 

number47

Member
What could work though? It's hard to find something that could be a success, that isn't connected to the big name heroes in anyway. Suicide Squad? Animal Man? Another Constantine maybe?


I'm sure they'll sell as the lead up to Avengers 2.

Sci Fi movies are expensive.I only see marvel pumping how cool GoG is with their new show.and probably tons of games.but it will 100% be a avengers 2 lead up.
 

MisterHero

Super Member
Tired of Batman, when are you punks gonna grow some balls and put DC's lesser knowns on the big screen? But of course, this probably is another bullshit rumor.
It will be their new character Batwing. lol Terry

a prototype Beyond suit was spotted in recent Batman comics, and he's probably gonna use it
 

Veelk

Banned
I think that's why DC is looking into properties like Sandman and Metal Men; their other famous characters like Wonder Woman and Aquaman are so dug into pop culture consciousness (and not in an entirely good way) that it might be worth it to try and elevate some lesser known ip. You can limit the budgets and potentially have a little more creative freedom.

Trying to adapt Sandman to film is almost surely a recipe for disaster. It's entire plot structure is way too big and scattered for a 2.5 hour movie. Even if they try to break it up by story arcs, that's going to be what, 10+ films to conclude it? If they do it properly? Which you know they won't. It'd have some hope as a TV show, but a movie is simply insanity.

I feel Aquaman and Wonder Woman are better opportunities because they have the dubious honor of being both really famous AND criminally underrepresented. Their name alone will catch a good deal of audiences while also keeping their expectations in check due to ignorance of the actual characters.
 
Honestly DC movie threads are pointless since the studio has no idea what its doing. Even if a batman beyond is really proposed and considered its very likely they will scrape it for something random like a low budget Lobo movie that completely misses the point of the comics.
 

ReiGun

Member
Trying to adapt Sandman to film is almost surely a recipe for disaster. It's entire plot structure is way too big and scattered for a 2.5 hour movie. Even if they try to break it up by story arcs, that's going to be what, 10+ films to conclude it? If they do it properly? Which you know they won't. It'd have some hope as a TV show, but a movie is simply insanity.

I feel Aquaman and Wonder Woman are better opportunities because they have the dubious honor of being both really famous AND criminally underrepresented. Their name alone will catch a good deal of audiences while also keeping their expectations in check due to ignorance of the actual characters.

I imagine Sandman will be a television project. DC was willing to put Superman, Wonder Woman, and Green Arrow on TV, after all. They clearly have a stake and interest in the television business.

They're both famous, but not for the right reasons. Aquaman especially has an uphill battle after years of falling victim to every lazy "lol only talks to fish" joke in the book. It's not going to help at box office when everyone thinks your character is a joke. Something like Animal Man, however, does not have that problem.

Both come with their own risks, of course. But I do think it shows some good thinking on DC's part that they're considering both the big name characters and lesser known characters as priorities for the future.
 

cdkee

Banned
Honestly, this is the best thing for them to do if they want to make a JL movie or even a World's Finest. They need a Batman that can withstand some serious punches and pull his own weight with MoS Superman. Ergo, they need Batman to be able to fly and have his nanosuit (which doesn't seem too farfetched, at least to me). They can even have it be Bruce Wayne, it doesn't have to be Terry.

I would love it, personally. I friggin loved Batman Beyond.
 

Haly

One day I realized that sadness is just another word for not enough coffee.
They should take the Sherlock approach to adapting Sandman (this is a Sandman thread now) and create 90 minute long mini-movies for every arc.
 
That's the smartest thing to do right now. Man universe is a step no other Batman movie can achieve right, so Batman Beyond is the logical step. Change the story a bit and bring JGL back. I still wish they didn't give him the name "Robin" as that's just stupidly stupid of Nolan.
 

Veelk

Banned
They're both famous, but not for the right reasons. Aquaman especially has an uphill battle after years of falling victim to every lazy "lol only talks to fish" joke in the book. It's not going to help at box office when everyone thinks your character is a joke. Something like Animal Man, however, does not have that problem.

Both come with their own risks, of course. But I do think it shows some good thinking on DC's part that they're considering both the big name characters and lesser known characters as priorities for the future.

I don't see that as a such a bad thing. Because of that, you'll automatically have people who go see Aquaman just to see how much fail he is. Or, they'll ask their friend who did see it how much fail it was. Either way, the infamy of Aquman's suckage is such that it will capture people's attention.

After that, the trick is to prove them wrong and make the movie awesome. Or they may not even have to go that far and just market it well. Part of Man of Steel's success is the excellent marketing. The very trailers promised that, unlike the snoozefest that was Superman Returns, this one will be full of heart pumping action.

But I do agree that it's good that DC is FINALLY moving past Batman and Superman. I just wish I had assurance that they will be good movies.

They should take the Sherlock approach to adapting Sandman (this is a Sandman thread now) and create 90 minute long mini-movies for every arc.

The problem with sandman is that it's structure is very up and down. You can have an 10+ issue arc centering around one event. Then you have this single out of nowhere issue dedicated to explaining Nada's backstory or introducing Hob. Sometimes it happens in the middle of an ongoing story arc. These are important things, but they often aren't made relevant until much later. It worked for a comic book because you got the story in short 20~ page bursts a month anyway, so a small interruption wasn't a big deal, but it won't work for a movie where every minute is precious and you don't see the next part for 2 years. A single ongoing story arc like a normal TV show seems to be the best option, since that's the closest structure to comic books anyway (you get a short periodic burst of story like in comics)
 

Kanyon

Member
They have to establish the regular versions before they start throwing the alternate world ones. Personally I would love to see Old Man Logan made into a film

This! Old Man Logan is one my favourite comic book stories, would defintely love to see this adapted, along with Superman Red Son which is probably at the top of my list.

As for live action Batman Beyond, I find the concurrent timelines interesting... Where MoS/Batman/JL take place now while BB takes place in the future of that cinematic universe. If Warner Bros. can pull it off, it will be spectacular.
 
I kinda wanna see Karl Urban as Batman. Somehow. Maybe Middle-Aged Terry. But if we get Batman Beyond, it'll most likely be an origin story with a real young Terry. What actor is like a good young Karl Urban?
 

I'M FINISHED!

Um exCUSE me Sakurai but CLEARLY the best choice for Smash Bros would be my fav niche character HOWEVER you are clearly INCOMPETENT and
Batman Blehyond

Give me a mix of Nolan's serious tone, mixed with some of the more fantastical elements from the comics, and keep Wayne in the cowl instead. How about that WB?
 

ReiGun

Member
The problem with sandman is that it's structure is very up and down. You can have an 10+ issue arc centering around one event. Then you have this single out of nowhere issue dedicated to explaining Nada's backstory or introducing Hob. Sometimes it happens in the middle of an ongoing story arc. These are important things, but they often aren't made relevant until much later. It worked for a comic book because you got the story in short 20~ page bursts a month anyway, so a small interruption wasn't a big deal, but it won't work for a movie where every minute is precious and you don't see the next part for 2 years. A single ongoing story arc like a normal TV show seems to be the best option, since that's the closest structure to comic books anyway (you get a short periodic burst of story like in comics)
Based on what I know of Sandman (haven't read it yet; in my backlog), it would be right at home as an HBO series. Warner has no problem doing fantasy shows based on books after all, with "Game of Thrones" and "True Blood" both being immensely popular.
 

Error

Jealous of the Glory that is Johnny Depp
The failure of PR this past weekend probably didn't help. WB probably is not in the mood to try and sell something new and less proven than a series of films centered in JL universe.

Legendary put 75% of the film's budget, WB the remaining 25% plus the bulk of the marketing. I don't think it'll matter much if PR bombs or is successful.
 

hiro4

Member
Awesome news!
loved the series, loved the movie, never read the comics though.
How are those? Worth reading?
 

AniHawk

Member
just get jon blake in there learning the ropes as batman in his own way.

god jgl is older now than bale was when batman begins came out
 
Doing Beyond as a future-version of the MoS universe (which is apparently going to host Justice League) is a really damn risky proposition. They'd be writing themselves into corners at every turn, nailing down the future of films yet to be written.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
I will sell my soul. Somebody draw up the goddamn pentacle.
 

catabarez

Member
Doing Beyond as a future-version of the MoS universe (which is apparently going to host Justice League) is a really damn risky proposition. They'd be writing themselves into corners at every turn, nailing down the future of films yet to be written.

This is deep future man. Retcons can happen in movies too though.
 

Salsa

Member
Bruce Timm went pretty deep on a podcast with Kevin Smith about how he seriously worked for a long time on a take on this before Begins got made. This is obviouly just a rumor, but for a while there WB definetly wanted to get this thing done, so who knows.
 

Jarmel

Banned
From what I understand Nolan was actually working in the concept of the Batman Beyond movie but eventually those concepts changed to regular batman. Don't know if it was Nolan or other higher ups.

I didn't need to hear this. A Nolan Batman Beyond would blow my fucking mind.
 

Busty

Banned
AFAIK Batman Beyond has never been off the table at WB so this really shouldn't be a surprise to anyone. They were apparently considering a big relaunch of the cartoon a few years ago (which Nolan's Batman might have killed) so it's definitely an IP they are interested in.

The beauty being that, if they were inclined, WB could have a 'darker' contemporary Batman that was closer to the Arkham Asylum games and a more 'family friendly' Batman Beyond film to compliment it.

This actually was WB's plan when they had originally set Darren Aronofsky to direct a crazy, fucked up Batman Year One style movie and announced a Batman Beyond film right alongside it. Neither went forward and we got Batman Begins instead.

More IGN insider sources?

Batman On Film is pretty reliable IIRC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom