NeOak
Member
We could be next, you know?As a Texan I smiled.
We could be next, you know?As a Texan I smiled.
does away with the permit and training program
The law, which does away with the permit and training program for people 21 and older who want to carry a concealed weapon, was supported by the National Rifle Association, but opposed by law enforcement across the state.
What planet am I on guys? Is this Universe 6?
Hey, you're the one financing this shit.![]()
Meanwhile you have "responsible" gun owners all over the place, and on this forum who "support" training and other comnon sense safety regulations, but who are members of the NRA because it gives them discounts at the range.
To them, and the NRA: Fuck you.
No training and no permits...
Why even fucking SELL them? Why not just hand them out to everyone when they turn 21??
Everyone gets a beer and a gun at 21, taking "21 shots" on your birthday to a whole new level.
Fucking RED States. Reap what you sew idiots.
You know how to get laws like these repealed?
Have every african american in the state start carrying a weapon. in fact, that seems to be a great way to counter lots of these gun laws across the country.
Don't like it get off your ass and finance gun control groups. But wait, bitching on the Internet is easier.
You're more a part of the problem than myself.![]()
2 years from now: "Why are so many people dying in our state? It must be because the cops don't have enough firepower! Let's pass a law giving them assault rifles, tanks, and more to stop criminals!"
No they wouldn't. You'd just have more killings in the name of self-defense and everyone will just be like "Okay. Sounds good."
Why do you say that?
Why do you say that?
Except for the fact that there is no documented increase in crime or violence in any of the concealed carry states (which is almost all of them) or the permitless carry states.
Concealed carry holders commit crime at a lower rate than the general public, and at a lower rate even than police officers.
But you still need a permit to own the gun, right?
Meanwhile you have "responsible" gun owners all over the place, and on this forum who "support" training and other comnon sense safety regulations, but who are members of the NRA because it gives them discounts at the range.
To them, and the NRA: Fuck you.
Something I've always wondered: Does anyone have any statistics on how many crimes are stopped/prevented by the victim or bystander possessing a gun?
I keep hearing the PR line about how guns help prevent crime, but I don't recall ever seeing any hard numbers proving that out.
Naturally, I suspect that's because the numbers would indicate that unregulated guns tend to increase the crime rate, but I'm willing to hear otherwise.
Lefty Vermont has had it for years, where are all the terrible results?
Amusing that you ask these types of questions and make these claims when you openly admit your distrust in statistics.Except for the fact that there is no documented increase in crime or violence in any of the concealed carry states (which is almost all of them) or the permitless carry states.
I am a radical anti-statist and not a statistician.
No, he really isn't. And this is a bizarre justification for being part of an indisputably fucked up and corrupt institution which intentionally profits (literally) off the death of children, and in fact see gun sales spike whenever a tragedy occurs thanks to their horrific brand of callous fundamentalism. But no dude, ten percent off and shit. Totes worth it.
"Hey, if you don't like murder, maybe you should start an anti-murder group! You're more responsible for murder than I am, LOL!"
You're talking about Mammoth Jones aren't you?
No training and no permits...
Why even fucking SELL them? Why not just hand them out to everyone when they turn 21??
Everyone gets a beer and a gun at 21, taking "21 shots" on your birthday to a whole new level.
Fucking RED States. Reap what you sew idiots.
What planet am I on guys? Is this Universe 6?
Radical gun law? Really OP?
You, like the OP, need to calm down and tone down the anti-gun rhetoric. This thread is about a state removing restrictions on a CCW permit.
Vermont is fine, especially since they never had such laws.
I guess I just don't view the NRA as the baby killing organization you do. I just view them as way too into the politics and should get back to their roots just advocating responsible ownership and marksmanship.
I'd prefer it if they had no ability to really lobby politicians and if that means more gun control legislation then so be it. I don't think any organization should be able to buy politicians and policy.
But if I took some bullshit principled stand whenever an organization I was a member of did shit I don't implicitly agree with well I'd have to go live in isolation. Well not really but that's my take on it.
But I also understand your view even if I don't agree with it entirely. .
Need to make a new amendment to get rid of #2
Owning a gun should be a very limited privilege, not a right
I guess I just don't view the NRA as the baby killing organization you do. I just view them as way too into the politics and should get back to their roots just advocating responsible ownership and marksmanship.
I'd prefer it if they had no ability to really lobby politicians and if that means more gun control legislation then so be it. I don't think any organization should be able to buy politicians and policy.
But if I took some bullshit principled stand whenever an organization I was a member of did shit I don't implicitly agree with well I'd have to go live in isolation. Well not really but that's my take on it.
But I also understand your view even if I don't agree with it entirely.
Hey I'm just a gun owning, God fearing man of the people.
Amusing that you ask these types of questions and make these claims when you openly admit your distrust in statistics.
"I don't trust the statistics that go against my views, not that I demonstrated any ability to understand such a paper to begin with. And since there are no other studies that refute my own anecdotal personal observations, my unsubstantiated anecdotal personal observations shall remain undisputed." There's literally no point in debating research with you, so please don't drag research into your arguments.
I was going to make the comparison of gun nuts with anti-vaxxers in clinging onto their beliefs, then I realized that would probably be insulting to anti-vaxxers. At least the latter group temporarily had one scientific paper (published in The Lancet, no less!) supporting them. The NRA and other gun lobbies can't even produce one convincing peer-reviewed paper to support the claims that having a gun is safer than not having a gun. Not a single reference. Pathetic. Continue hiding behind that Second Amendment.
I'd approve of 8-years of college. People with PhD's and J.D. degrees are smart..
Large scale and significant research is forbidden.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...ence-research-ban_us_56606201e4b072e9d1c4eaaa
And the push to overturn the ban last failed, I believe.
Majority? Why are you using statistical terms when you distrust statistics? How do you know it's a majority? And why do you trust that reference?Frankly, the burden is on you to convince a super-majority of the public to repeal the 2nd Amendment.
When you use terms like "statist," it doesn't take much more effort on my part. If you haven't figured it out by now, I don't care about your own personal opinion or philosophy on gun ownership. But if you claim "evidence," I will call you out on in. Notice how I'm leaving Mammoth Jones alone. He doesn't throw around unsubstantiated claims like you do.hockeypuck might disagree with that...he calls me dumb in every thread.
I have a feeling that's about to change.
Majority? Why are you using statistical terms when you distrust statistics? How do you know it's a majority? And why do you trust that reference?
I will continue to stand strong for individual rights. I am not going to play the game of those who want to subordinate individual rights to leviathan, one of the most dishonest "movements" ever foisted on the American public. Every time they are challenged, they dredge up some discredited advocacy study from some statist website or academic elitist. Frankly, the burden is on you to convince a super-majority of the public to repeal the 2nd Amendment. So far studies that include suicides and gang-bangers in the sample has failed, lying about semi-autos (Josh Sugarmann) and calling them "assault weapons" has failed. Including 17 year-old drug dealers as "deaths of children" has failed. I don't know what new "study" is going to convince Mr. and Mrs. America to give up the God given rights their ancestors died for.
hockeypuck might disagree with that...he calls me dumb in every thread.
Yeah, no offense to any West Virginians but I live in Western PA and it's very depressing down there.West Virginia is probably the saddest state in the country. Depressing all around.
Yeah, no offense to any West Virginians but I live in Western PA and it's very depressing down there.
Gun owners in West Virginia will no longer need to get a permit to have a concealed weapon... The law, which does away with the permit and training program for people 21 and older who want to carry a concealed weapon, was supported by the National Rifle Association, but opposed by law enforcement across the state.