Wolves Eat Dogs is the "very good" one in my long winded sentence - better than Stalin's Ghost but not quite up to the standards of Red Square or Gorky Park. The setting is an obvious plus and the mystery is good, it just felt a tiny bit less impressive than the absolute best Renko stories to me. Part of that might be a personal preference for the presence or absence of certain ongoing characters from the previous books.Mifune said:What did you think of Wolves Eat Dogs? I have a copy of Stalin's Ghost that sits here, as yet unread.
And I couldn't agree with you more about Rose. I absolutely love that book. Up there with Gorky Park as my favorite MCS book period.
Alucard said:I am finishing this up tonight...
It's excellent in its individual chapters, but I'm still trying to like the book as a whole. I was hoping for a more consistent following of characters, instead of the "let's introduce a bunch of new characters and make you care about them for 20-30 pages and then fast forward 30-50 years and start all over again." More thoughts later. Asimov is still awesome. I will be moving on to Foundation and Empire after this.
I would stop. Martin introduces so much filler into book 2 that I can't believe this series will be finished before 2015.Yonn said:I just finished A Game of Thrones, which I liked but didn't love and I'm kinda on the fence about continuing with the series. I'm not much for political intrigues (I should have got a hint from the book's title) and I don't think most of the characters are interesting enough to warrant their own chapters. Also, there was such a plethora of them, all with names, nick-names and vast families. It confused me to the point where my mind just couldn't place them. Another minor thing that annoyed me was the almost "romantic novel" style of the sex scenes was off-putting and felt unnecessary and
Like I said, I enjoyed it, but there are lots of other books I want to read... Should I stick with it or move on?
dagZ said:
nitewulf said:
Will be starting this soon.JzeroT1437 said:
Excellent, EXCELLENT book.bengraven said:
Will be re-reading this soon.dagZ said:
he was always on my "to do" list, i mean to read, not to fuck. finally decided to pick up a collection.tammolives said:What do you think of Kerouac? I'm halfway through Dharma Bums. It's....different.
JzeroT1437 said:
Frankenstein: A Cultural History by Susan Tyler Hitchcock
An interesting exploration of how Shelley's Frankenstein became a cultural icon and modern myth over the span of a very short period of time. I was looking into reading up on horror culture and this seemed like a good starting place, since I've always had sort of a soft spot for Frankie.
Mumei said:And I am currently reading:
ninj4junpei said:
Jeff-DSA said:Just finished Watchmen at the beginning of the month, and now I'm reading this:
So far, it's been awesome.
E-phonk said:
BruceLeeRoy said:I loved no country and was thinking about picking this up.
What did you think?
Boogie9IGN said:I'm reading it right now too and I have about 80 pages left. The lack of grammar is kinda trippy at first but it adds to the book I think. Anyway, it's really sad so far and some parts are downright depressing
DarkJediKnight said:
Masamune said:You are the man.
I'd like to note, however, that while the Fagles translation is by far the most literal I've seen, its translation erases most poetic quality from the epic. I might recommend you take a look at the Fitzgerald translation (which typically accepted as the most accurate not only semantically but in terms of poetic rhythm) and compare the two.
BruceLeeRoy said:Let me know what you think when you finish it.
Monroeski said:
Is it weird that I have a Master's degree and I'm going back for a certification? :lol
JzeroT1437 said:. I was looking into reading up on horror culture and this seemed like a good starting place, since I've always had sort of a soft spot for Frankie.
Illuminating the dark side of the American century, THE MONSTER SHOW uncovers the surprising links between horror entertainment and the great social crises of our time, as well as horror's function as a pop-cultural counterpart to surrealism, expressionism, and other twentieth-century artistic movements.
With penetrating analyses and vivid anecdotes, David J. Skal explores a broad landscape of cultural expression -- from painting and photography, to theater and television, to comic books and novels. Ultimately focusing on film, the predominant art form of the modern world, he examines the many ways in which this medium has played out the traumas of two world wars and the Depression; the nightmare visions of invasion and mind control engendered by the Cold War; the preoccupation with demon children and mutants that took hold as thalidomide, birth control, and abortion changed the reproductive landscape; the vogue in body-transforming special effects that paralleled the development of the plastic surgery industry; the link between the rise of the AIDS epidemic and a renewed fascination with vampires; and much more. With a new afterword by the author that looks at horror's popular renaissance in the last decade, THE MONSTER SHOW is a compulsively readable, thought-provoking inquiry into America's continuing obsession with the macabre.
E-phonk said:
Masamune said:You are the man.
I'd like to note, however, that while the Fagles translation is by far the most literal I've seen, its translation erases most poetic quality from the epic. I might recommend you take a look at the Fitzgerald translation (which typically accepted as the most accurate not only semantically but in terms of poetic rhythm) and compare the two.
Fuck those people.Guybrush Threepwood said:I had to read Life of Pi one year in high school and I swear that everyone but me hated it.