NotMyProblemAnymoreCunt
Biggest Trails Stan
Who the hell said Tom Holland?
![]()
I hope it's Zendaya
Let Tom Holland play the Bond Girl
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbe08/bbe08a94260e444cc7150b18401b37827e0b6248" alt="Eyes :eyes: š"
Last edited:
Who the hell said Tom Holland?
![]()
The last one, No Time to Die, was horrible in my honest opinion. That was not the James Bond I know from other movies.I know people would complain about it being āpoliticalā or something, but I genuinely think Idris Elba would be an awesome pick. Honestly, not a lot of actors that come to mind that are āsmoothā in the way I associate with James Bond.
I hope it's Zendaya
Let Tom Holland play the Bond Girl![]()
He is great in the new Nosferatu.
I see what you're saying but this is a "best of" category no?Looks are important, but you need to have something else. It's why Jessica Biel stops me from choosing any movies she's in despite being absolutely gorgeous. Megan Fox isn't either a great actress, but she at least exuded sensuality in Transformers 1. Biel and Taylor-Johnson both have negative levels of charisma.
If Aaron was capable of a greater facial acting range than this I'd be more okay.
I see what you're saying but this is a "best of" category no?
I feel this is like choosing between Jack Daniels or Jameson only because the bartender doesn't have Macallan 12.
Who would you have pegged for a good shoe in for the 007 role?
Honestly i would kill to see that.Can we get Peter Dinklage on the vote pls, thx
Can we get Peter Dinklage on the vote pls, thx
If they have a script ready to go and can have a film out in 12-18 months I'd agree.Henry Cavill is really the only choice if you want to succeed.
D'ya know, that wouldn't even surprise me in this day and age.I hope it's Zendaya
Let Tom Holland play the Bond Girl![]()
Woulda made a good M.Bring back Pierce!
![]()
![]()
Its Hollywood so the chances of this happening are not zero
The correct answer is Tom Hiddleston
The rest of you are wrong.
Your mum has the face of an AIDS victimjust no, dude super annoying, and got the face of an aids victim
He's cool but he's too thin. I'd believe he was a military commander before I'd believe he was Bond.The correct answer is Tom Hiddleston
The rest of you are wrong.
No one gets what they want? I feel like that one would be a huge win for the āda movies are out to get me!ā crowd.Zendaya as Bond, Tom Holland as Moneypenny....calling it now!
Cavill will get one scene as Q putting together a PC.
Idris Elba as M.
This way theu give NO ONE what we want while saying they are giving the fans everything they've ever asked for.
FFS use the spoiler feature for screamer like thatElliot Page.
![]()
FFS use the spoiler feature for screamer like that
Elliot Page.
![]()
Heās too friendly-looking and pretty. Also too buffed upHenry Cavill is really the only choice if you want to succeed.
Heās too friendly-looking and pretty. Also too buffed up
Cavill is definitely suave and good-looking, but not in a bad boy way. Bond is not supposed to be someone who looks like heās straight from The Bachelorā¦Bond should look disarming... He's SUPPOSED to be suave and good looking. That's what Cavill is.
Folks want Cavill as Bond, not Q. Folks want Idris as Bond, not as M. And Zendaya as Bond being what ANYONE wants? Get outta here!No one gets what they want? I feel like that one would be a huge win for the āda movies are out to get me!ā crowd.
If we look at the boks, Bond is described as :He's cool but he's too thin. I'd believe he was a military commander before I'd believe he was Bond.
Thereās a section of people who want to complain and those choices would give them that opportunity. Itās not about watching the movie, since they donāt really watch movies now but will flock to ācontentā around a film like flies to shit if they can get annoyed at it. So why not cash in on it? There could be untapped potential. Just simple supply and demand of giving some people what they want.Folks want Cavill as Bond, not Q. Folks want Idris as Bond, not as M. And Zendaya as Bond being what ANYONE wants? Get outta here!
Tom Holland as a lickspittle Moneypenny, yah maybe that one is a go if they are gonna dump the flirty banter regardless.
I kinda think thats how 'they' (studio execs) greenlight shit today anyway. It's all focus grouped to death and not made to appeal to anyone, but rather NOT OFFEND anyone. Thus it's bland crap. I bet 95% of these "What do you think about XXX playing YYY" social media posts are just marketing teams spitballing ideas to see if they can get any traction to then sell it to a studio.They wouldnāt even need to make an actual movie since that audience wonāt be watching it. Shoot footage for a few trailers do promotional interviews and get the stars posting things on social media to boil some piss. Everything produced stays under a couple minutes since the audienceās attention span is fried from social media. Itās a much smaller time and money investment required than making an actual movie.
You could do stuff like charge people to dislike the trailer on YouTube. Have a leaderboard so that those who pay the most can show off that they dislike it the most. Dangle a carrot by letting it be known that one of the stars will upload a sad video to social media if it gets enough dislikes. Maybe they even mention specific accounts that paid to dislike or leave a comment on social media. So itās like a prize draw where people can have the chance to be the hero of the piece.
Around the same time you could shoot an actual movie for the audience that go to see those.
That would be the thing about it, if you have people who want to get annoyed then start churning out content for them to get annoyed at. None of itās real, just something to distract them for a couple minutes at most. So if you have an audience who donāt want to watch movies but do want to hit the dislike button while taking a shit in the bathroom then why not do something with that.I kinda think thats how 'they' (studio execs) greenlight shit today anyway. It's all focus grouped to death and not made to appeal to anyone, but rather NOT OFFEND anyone. Thus it's bland crap. I bet 95% of these "What do you think about XXX playing YYY" social media posts are just marketing teams spitballing ideas to see if they can get any traction to then sell it to a studio.
Manufactured social media 'content' is pretty obvious. No different, really, than staged dates between stars of a rom-com for the tabloids or "we gots a beef!" drama between actors, musicians, or sportsball players. ANY news is good news for these folks.
Tom Hardy is a wet fart. Fuckin' hate his face.