If we're playing the game of chance, I'd rather add more chances of them making the game 60fps, than add more chances of them screwing up a solid framerate. If that means graphics that are just a tad below realism with an FOV of 75, then so be it.you can have 60fps without cartoony graphics and 60fps lol.
Dude. You can have realistic graphics and 60fps. metro exodus anyone? tlou2 remaster anyone?If we're playing the game of chance, I'd rather add more chances of them making the game 60fps, than add more chances of them screwing up a solid framerate. If that means graphics that are just a tad below realism with an FOV of 75, then so be it.
Yeah, same. The feel is just not there.absolutely should have been third person. First person just doesn’t work here, imo
The content is okay but the pacing is horrendus.
I'm saying that I know some developers can, but if Machinegames couldn't get it to work, then the least they can do is give me fun gameplay at 60fps.Dude. You can have realistic graphics and 60fps. metro exodus anyone? tlou2 remaster anyone?
And you would really take 60fps over the cost of making the game bad?
it looks like a swtch game
and what the hell is a pussle?
No. Outside of the cutscenes, this is a FPS. The developer themselves even said it.I heard that it will be both 1st and 3rd. Maybe depending on the situation.
absolutely should have been third person. First person just doesn’t work here, imo
Indy looks cool, but kinda just makes me want to play Wolfenstein.
forced Strong woman timeIndy
notes:
1. ok, FPS.
...
2. looks better than expexted but way behind the AAA gods.
3. Still not enough gameplay.
4. kinda underwhelming.
5.ok now they are justifying why FPS (contradictory)
6. passsive cutscenes?
7. not a strong showing but good enough i guess?