I think it's the pacing. You unlock cosmetic content really slowly for a $40 game ($60 on consoles). It's clear that it's tuned to generate additional monetization.
Overwatch - Review Thread
- Thread starter orthodoxy1095
- Start date
I think it's the pacing. You unlock cosmetic content really slowly for a $40 game ($60 on consoles). It's clear that it's tuned to generate additional monetization.
You do? You cap out at 4 things per 1.5 hours. I actually think it's the PERFECT pace, Every time you look, even at the XP ceiling, you're about to earn another box. Speaking from personal closed beta experience, at least 75% of the time I was about to log off, I'd go 'oh, I'm 80% to a level' and play 1-2 more matches to finish it out and get a box.
JetBlackPanda
Member
Obliterator
Member
Still incredible. Who knows where it will end up but 90+ Meta is looking very very likely
Did you find it though? The yellow Mcree skin? lol.
-MD-
Member
Sent in my ticket for a refund, 100 or nothing.
ElBoxyBrown
Banned
It's a Very deep MOBA game. I recommend you redbox it. You might be surprised.
Disgusting!
Stone Ocean
Member
I wouldn't be worried, Diablo 3 UE support has been stellar.
Ardenyal
Member
They never got rid of the hacked item issue and no seasons either. Not what i would call stellar support.
Movalpolos
Banned
Where are these 8s coming from all of a sudden?!?!
WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON
WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON
eNut_ButteR
Banned
Hi, I'd like you to meet CS:GO, the most competitive shooter in existence.
Bubba_Sparks
Member
I played the beta, and was blown away by the core gameplay mechanics. Maybe some people are right and the game will end up "overated", though I don't think that's the right term. It might not have enough content in terms of gameplay modes, but the core mechanics are phenomenal. I think that is the most difficult aspect to nail in any game, and Blizzard knocked it out of the park. We'll have to see how it plays out going forward, but the quality of the foundation is far above what most games could hope to achieve.
A Serious Man
Member
The game is basically bringing 2007-2011 TF2 to the masses. In other words, it's doing the Lord's work.
yessss. review salt is so good.
ElBoxyBrown
Banned
I remember playing TF2 on PS3 launch day. The hype was there. Policies back then just prevented Valve from having the console versions updated.
PowerThroughLov
Member
I would not have guessed that Blizzard would develop a successful (critically at least) Cooperative FPS just 2 years ago. Crazy how fun this appears for a developer with their background.
MetalGearZed
Member
The best of games nor the worst of games can avoid the dreaded 8.
butman
Member
Very nice reviews! Too bad online-shooters are not my thing at all anymore. Too old.
Same. Good for the genre but not interested at all.
Blizzard did a great work putting money on it.
AndrewDean84xX
Banned
Agreed. Same reason I can't get into the free to play stuff. Just no real carrot on a string, motivating me to keep playing/grinding.
Jawbreaker
Member
Incredible scores so far. I really want to try this out despite being generally awful at competitive multiplayer games.
joecanada
Member
surprised at all the tens already based on this
"I mostly enjoyed my time with Overwatch as it is very easy to pick up and play. The characters are diverse and just as colourful as the levels where battles take place. As a free-to-play title, Id have no problems with the grinding and micro-transactions, but these mechanics in a feature-lite, full priced title, mar the overall experience for me. Maybe youre okay with that, but Im not. No matter how many games do it, Ill never be okay with it."
the 10/10 people didn't seem to have an issue so it's either become accepted (not by me) or it isn't that prevalent in this game. Will wait for further reviews or LTTP/follow up threads.
"I mostly enjoyed my time with Overwatch as it is very easy to pick up and play. The characters are diverse and just as colourful as the levels where battles take place. As a free-to-play title, Id have no problems with the grinding and micro-transactions, but these mechanics in a feature-lite, full priced title, mar the overall experience for me. Maybe youre okay with that, but Im not. No matter how many games do it, Ill never be okay with it."
the 10/10 people didn't seem to have an issue so it's either become accepted (not by me) or it isn't that prevalent in this game. Will wait for further reviews or LTTP/follow up threads.
A Serious Man
Member
Yeah, console players never got to experience TF2 at its peak, it's a real shame.
There's a hero for almost any type of player and skill level. Support heroes are pretty important to winning and the skill cap can be lower on them.
All the unlocks are purely cosmetic stuff. Skins, victory poses, sprays, etc. None of them affect gameplay, so it's not as if you're unlocking weapons or something as in CoD. You can't pay for progress. I don't see why it should have an effect on the game's score tbh. It's a nice extra, but not at all relevant to the actual game -- unless the mere existence of them is objectionable to the reviewer as a matter of principle, which I would say is a bit naive in the contemporary videogame environment. There are many issues to be had with some of the microtransaction models out there, but the one used by Overwatch is hardly problematic.
FF Seraphim
Member
Okay awesome, will get it
meanspartan
Member
So sooo true. Garbage games with metacritics in the 50s or lower will inevitably have some no-name reviewer giving it an 8. On Jim Sterling's recent podcast they opined it could totally be a lesser website wanting to appear on the top of metacritic for attention.
That seems a bit out-there, but I can see why they'd think that.
Beautiful Ninja
Member
Very nice reviews! Too bad online-shooters are not my thing at all anymore. Too old.
If you're worried about being too old for shooters, don't be for this game. Me and all my friends I play with are 30+ years old at this point. During our late teen and early 20's we were all in on things like CS and Battlefield, but for most of the past decade we've been World of Warcraft players. Our skills have atrophied due to age, no doubt, but since we work as a team, we can still consistently do well. We might not have any particularly good snipers, but we understand enough about general gameplay mechanics that we can make things work.
Shake Appeal
Member
Grinding? What? It's all cosmetic. It's meaningless. The gameplay is what matters.
Oh, there's more.
...okay? The object of the game is not to collect all the skins.
Askherserenity
Member
Crazy scores. Well deserved. The game is pretty much perfect.
Only downside is how time just fucking vanishes while you're playing it.
It's scary.
Only downside is how time just fucking vanishes while you're playing it.
It's scary.
orthodoxy1095
Banned
Are you there for cosmetics or to play the game?
If these were pay to win features, we'd be making more of a stink, sure. But they're all vanity items.
GitarooMan
Member
This is so true with the game. I sit down and then I look at the clock again and it's 2am.
Palette Swap
Member
I haven't played it too much, a few hours on the Beta and a few hours tonight, but beyond how cohesive and polished it looks, I love how they managed to make it accessible and yet overwhelming with the large numbers of characters, each with their quirks and an incredible variety of situational synergies.
It works well enough that I'm having fun with random people.
It works well enough that I'm having fun with random people.
ShooterMcGavin
Member
Yep, I'm in. Trying to convince the friends to buy this.
You're gonna regret not getting it sooner!
AlfredX1990
Banned
Finally a metacritic user saying the truth:
For people trying to bring up microtransactions, like that review, either through ignorance, curiosity, or otherwise:
A) The game didn't have anything you could 'buy' at all in the beta. It was still fun. We knew they were going to sell loot crates (they said they were) but they didn't then, and it was stil lfun and rewarding to earn them. Prior to this year, the game didn't have unlocks period. Literally none. No levelling no progression. The game was STILL fun. The basic gameplay hasn't even changed, it's just a fun game.
B) Stop comparing it to F2P titles. There are tons of non-F2P games that have microtransactions in them as ways to just kind of buy extra bullshit. Very few of them have all of said bullshit totally free within the game anyway at a very reasonable rate of acquisition (The cap on XP per level puts it at around 1 box per hour and a half in this game. that's 4 cosmetics every hour and a half).
If the game were ACTUALLY an F2P title, this is how it would work:
Heroes cost either 10 bucks a piece or you can grind 30-40 hours per hero to unlock them with ingame space bucks. You get like 2 heroes for free because fuck your teammates and team comp that's why.
Cosmetics like we get in loot boxes now? Sorry. Cash only. 5 bucks per skin, pay me.
Anyone that can't see the difference between the kind of scheme an actual F2P game uses, and a game that says 'fine, you can buy faster unlocks, and the unlocks don't matter, and they're acquired at a good pace anyway already' are night and day.
A) The game didn't have anything you could 'buy' at all in the beta. It was still fun. We knew they were going to sell loot crates (they said they were) but they didn't then, and it was stil lfun and rewarding to earn them. Prior to this year, the game didn't have unlocks period. Literally none. No levelling no progression. The game was STILL fun. The basic gameplay hasn't even changed, it's just a fun game.
B) Stop comparing it to F2P titles. There are tons of non-F2P games that have microtransactions in them as ways to just kind of buy extra bullshit. Very few of them have all of said bullshit totally free within the game anyway at a very reasonable rate of acquisition (The cap on XP per level puts it at around 1 box per hour and a half in this game. that's 4 cosmetics every hour and a half).
If the game were ACTUALLY an F2P title, this is how it would work:
Heroes cost either 10 bucks a piece or you can grind 30-40 hours per hero to unlock them with ingame space bucks. You get like 2 heroes for free because fuck your teammates and team comp that's why.
Cosmetics like we get in loot boxes now? Sorry. Cash only. 5 bucks per skin, pay me.
Anyone that can't see the difference between the kind of scheme an actual F2P game uses, and a game that says 'fine, you can buy faster unlocks, and the unlocks don't matter, and they're acquired at a good pace anyway already' are night and day.
Ghost is Bad
Banned
not sure if you're joking or if you're actually serious.
AnathemicOne
Banned
Finally a metacritic user saying the truth:
The salt is real
...Scatter...
Banned
OK - I caved. I hope you're all happy. Never played the beta so I took it overwhelmingly on GAF recommendation. Tonight we dance.
AlfredX1990
Banned
666% serious, any FPS game that runs at less than 180 frames per second is literally unplayable
I'm not being serious at all
RecRoulette
Member
Nothing against Battleborn (I think it's fine), but it's funny that this reviewer made a direct comparison only to go "They are two different games"
Similar threads
- Poll