He’s wrong anyways.I listened to the podcast. It was a longer discussion than this spicy headline of Sony cant compete and will be gone in 10 years.
I'll expand:
He also said that Sony is resting on the massive leads they built up in other territories US & UK (2:1), Middle East (10:1), etc. Sony views XBox as an anomaly and only US centric.
Where they will be in trouble is in 10 years, as there will be no need for consoles and they aren't positioned well for the future as they are reliant on consoles and have some good IP, but not enough content to fill a GamePass type service (primary driver for MS acquisition of Activision - duh).
One interesting other tidbit was he fel that Amazon will be a huge player in the future once consoles go away because their infrastructure, etc. is already built to handle it. Its also who Microsoft is most scared of. (Which back up Phil's comments about XBox's true competition).
Pachter actually came off decent and relatable. It was an enjoyable podcast and def not console fanboy flame war commentary. Check it out if interested in hearing for yourself.
I need to ask to Pachter: from when the Bethesda and Activision offers it's so attractive for the customers; many if not most of their games, sold below their expectations outside 3 or 4 notorious IPs. And why a subscription service with their games will kill the playstation sales? Seems so irrational.I listened to the podcast. It was a longer discussion than this spicy headline of Sony cant compete and will be gone in 10 years.
I'll expand:
He also said that Sony is resting on the massive leads they built up in other territories US & UK (2:1), Middle East (10:1), etc. Sony views XBox as an anomaly and only US centric.
Where they will be in trouble is in 10 years, as there will be no need for consoles and they aren't positioned well for the future as they are reliant on consoles and have some good IP, but not enough content to fill a GamePass type service (primary driver for MS acquisition of Activision - duh).
One interesting other tidbit was he fel that Amazon will be a huge player in the future once consoles go away because their infrastructure, etc. is already built to handle it. Its also who Microsoft is most scared of. (Which back up Phil's comments about XBox's true competition).
Pachter actually came off decent and relatable. It was an enjoyable podcast and def not console fanboy flame war commentary. Check it out if interested in hearing for yourself.
So it's on less systems.Pc, xcloud and their console. Unlike Sony, which is restricted to their console for day1 games, and pc games are roulette chance as of now.
MS is ready for the future, and their titles will reach alot of gamers, while Sony is limited to their console, unless they change their practices. This will have huge implication on next gen, if Xcloud improves fast, Windows store improves, and PC steam gets a lot of players. Sony will not be able to compete with that.
If Sony does day1, then they can challenge MS on the pc ground.
For their studios, MS has PC games. Elder scrolls and call of duty. Both zenimax and Activision/blizzard are PC publishers. Add that to their day1 pc games, and the gap between Sony and MS in that market is huge.
Xcloud also brings cloud gaming in to the table, but on another level. All day1 xbox+zenimax+activision/blizzard would be available through cloud. Meaning you dont need a console at all. If Smart tvs have xcloud, then you can potentially see the numbers MS will get from that section.
In short term, MS is proof future for their gaming division, while Sony is still pro consoles, and little bit dips on PC section. That $76b is putting them in a good spot. This is without gamepass. 3 years ago, MS had nothing, and now they have 30 studios firing contents for them, and 2 other systems ready to receive those contents.
Take these points as future investment.
Fanboys are amusing.He's not wrong here? When he said that? Don't know. But I know that Playstation already isn't what it used to be. Patchter were spot on this one.
Sony are positioning themselves to fight a war that they can't really win. Instead of fight a war that they already are defeated, they should focus on what they are strong and let the services providers do their thing.
Even now I'm baffled on how much they paid for Bungie. They don't have nothing that pays that price.
I can understand MS pay $70 Billion for Activision to keep it multiplataform. Microsoft's consoles will never sell more than what they achieved with Xbox 360. But they also have Windows to keep it filled with games. They have more to gain in a multiplataform ecosystem. Sony, meanwhile does not. In short term they will win some bucks. But how much will it cost to the brand?
I mean... I'm considered myself a hadcore Playstation fan. Even now I have my PS1, PS2, PS3, PSV and my PS4. But Sony make it really easy for me to just ignore totally the PS5.
Well... how mainstream is that? Will it have the same market penetration as any console? It is an interesting accessory. But that's all for now. In the future it can really be mainstream. But it's not like you can't have the same experience elsewhere.
how is 3 systems less?So it's on less systems.![]()
Well when the publishers originally put games on 4 systems:how is 3 systems less?
Most of bethesda/blizzard/activision games isnt on Switch. That is 3 platforms. Plus call of duty would be supported on playstation. So your point here is useless.Well when the publishers originally put games on 4 systems:
1) PC
2) Xbox
3) Nintendo
4) Playstation
4>3
And that's being generous calling Xcloud its own platform![]()
Most of bethesda/blizzard/activision games isnt on Switch. That is 3 platforms. Plus call of duty would be supported on playstation. So your point here is useless.
Xcloud is its own platform. You need an internet to play those games. I can play it through android tv.
MS with their own publishers have access to Xcloud, pc and their xbox.
Playstation/switch users have PC. That is if you hate xbox so much, that you dont want to buy xsx or xss.
Xcloud is for people who cant afford Gaming pc, and want to play through cloud gaming. This will be a hit, once cloud gaming issues gets fixed. Smart tvs are also accelerating this process. You dont even need to play it using your phone.
It's a new system haven't you heard. Like Nintendo making Mario 64 available on a number of systems like the Switch and Nintendo OnlineWhy are we still pretending xcloud is remotely viable at this point? It's an addition to gamepass. Nothing more.
Why are you downplaying the service? I showed you prime example of that service working on smart tv. Yes, it is viable. Its viable to those who cant afford to spend money on multiple consoles.Why are we still pretending xcloud is remotely viable at this point? It's an addition to gamepass. Nothing more.
Hey....Pachter was speaking 10-15 years out as streaming tech keeps improving....which is how Amazin is set up to be a key player.I keep hearing how consoles will go away...but we never sold as many consoles are right now overall.
Is there any indication sales will drop of a cliff?
What if 6G Wireless PSVR is Sony's Sega moment?6G Wireless PSVR says otherwise.
Technology is evolving at a rapid speed, so is gaming. Digital games were hard 15 years ago. Now, we are comfortable downloading 200gb games easily. It was a matter of time, before someone capitalizing these tools.I think console-less gaming is inevitable.
Those wheels have already started turning. Early, but turning.
Is there a website somewhere where I can see Patchers predictions? He's been going for over a decade of knowing nothing yet having articles being written about his predictions only for no one to fact check him
Exactly! Probably the most useless person at predicting future trends!Pachter.
So the opposite will happen
Haven't you ignored me?Fanboys are amusing.
OK! You proved your point.what a bunch of nonsense
If there is one 1 thing Sony has advantage, it's the gamers field. MS is a corporation. Sony doesn't have the same power as MS. So gamers will always rally behind the little guy. Then there is the generation were those gamers grow up with Sony systems. Ps1-ps2 were big.
Sony can afford to make stupid mistakes like ps3, but MS cant. Xbox one destroyed their reputation. To the point, where people forgot about ring of death.
Until MS can recover their identity, they pose no threat to MS, even with gamepass.
MS money won't matter, until they can produce iconic SP games. Sony have those ready.
Me too. But there is a lot of people who will buy a PS5 just because it is a PS5. And also some leftovers of good will because PS4 and PS3. The same thing happens to Apple. I might be wrong, but I think that on the Apple side it's about status among other reasons. But the same can't be applied to consoles I think.I'm honestly shocked MS isn't doing better then they are against PS.
People though xbox one would succesful, due to how good x360 was. same with ps2 to ps3, or wii to wii u.Short term I think that it is a really good strategy. The problem is in the long run. But I don't know if gamers will always run for the little guy. We can use Dreamcast as an example. Such amazing hardware but a lot of wrong decisions make Sega leave the console market.
As long as they vault content, It wont matter. Gamers biggest weakness is reviving old good contents.I totally agree with you that Sony can take some stupid mistakes. But not for too long time. And how much will it cost for the brand?
Gaming now is great compared to the past. We have huge catalog, which makes us busy. Starfield is like 9 months away. Times flies alot, when you are busy with other games.That being said, to me it's good. Now I can play a few games and I have no problem whatsoever to wait to play it. I've waited over 20 years to play Shenmue.![]()
I listen to every podcast I can. Iron Lords, Xbox Two, xboxera, Colin M, Ign.OP was crying about his warning points the other day and wondering why he was getting them. He though "me? I'm not like what they say I am".
Meanwhile these are the kinds of podcasts he watches/listens to.
![]()
Japan is Nintendoland now Sony is nowhere as big in Japan nowdays so boasting about Japan is not much of a flex anymoreMS has next to zero presence in Japan, so no lol
MS betting on cloud gaming but that only works if the country has reliable and affordable internet infrastructure. Just look at stadia lol
On the point of Sony not having enough IP to fill a sub service, there are plenty of small or mid sized publishers who don't have anywhere near enough games to have their own service so they will just lease their games to Sony just like EA play did for GP. The vast majority of games on GP arnt MSs own IP. Look at Netflix, the biggest streaming service has maybe 2% of the content made by them. Same goes for Spotify, infact they make non of the content themselves.I listened to the podcast. It was a longer discussion than this spicy headline of Sony cant compete and will be gone in 10 years.
I'll expand:
He also said that Sony is resting on the massive leads they built up in other territories US & UK (2:1), Middle East (10:1), etc. Sony views XBox as an anomaly and only US centric.
Where they will be in trouble is in 10 years, as there will be no need for consoles and they aren't positioned well for the future as they are reliant on consoles and have some good IP, but not enough content to fill a GamePass type service (primary driver for MS acquisition of Activision - duh).
One interesting other tidbit was he fel that Amazon will be a huge player in the future once consoles go away because their infrastructure, etc. is already built to handle it. Its also who Microsoft is most scared of. (Which back up Phil's comments about XBox's true competition).
Pachter actually came off decent and relatable. It was an enjoyable podcast and def not console fanboy flame war commentary. Check it out if interested in hearing for yourself.
My biggest point that people seem to be missing is that he is actually paid money by investors to give his opinion about the industry.
As long as this exist, no company will die fast. Konami is still alive due to that. They own metal gear and silent hill. 2 of the most hyped IPs. and Pes. We dont talk about that one,.Pach's big error in gis analysis is his over estimation of the impact of back catalog games.
So look who Cnbc and Bloomberg bring on to talk about and give advice on the gaming industry. Its not you, it's not me, it's Pachter. He has one of the highest profiles in gaming market analysis regardless of what we might think of him.No, that's what you assume. You have no idea where Pachter's money comes from or why so stop pretending you do.
It's only me who would like to slap his face when releases such stupid predictions without any kind of logic?
It's rare to see a post where the majority of comments are in agreement here on Gaf. Along with the funny observations and GIFs, this has been a fun read. Well done, OP.![]()
So look who Cnbc and Bloomberg bring on to talk about and give advice on the gaming industry. Its not you, it's not me, it's Pachter. He has one of the highest profiles in gaming market analysis regardless of what we might think of him.
As long as this exist, no company will die fast. Konami is still alive due to that. They own metal gear and silent hill. 2 of the most hyped IPs. and Pes. We dont talk about that one,.
This is surprising here? It's like 80% Sony fans.
See it's only a matter of posts before a MS fanboy quotes the usual "trillion dollar company". Strange I never really see Apple or Google fanboys doing the same to enforce their opinion? The trillion dollar company slogan hasn't helped MS overtake Google in search or advertising. Nor beat Apple in revenue etc.They may laugh at this prediction but I doubt they will be laughing at a trillion dollar company who purchased Zenimax for 7.5billion and is going to aquire acti-blizz for 70bill.
You say it's viable?Why are you downplaying the service? I showed you prime example of that service working on smart tv. Yes, it is viable. Its viable to those who cant afford to spend money on multiple consoles.
On the RDX podcast today Michael Pachter was asked about how he sees the landscape between Sony and Microsoft this gen, to which he replied "I think PlayStation is doomed, and I think they will cease to exist with how we know them in about 10 years. They can't compete, they have no chance of competing".
His point is that Gamepass is going to become the biggest thing in gaming and Sony don't have the first party studios to fill a comparable service, and the back catalogue that MS is going to have when Activision closes is a mountain too high for them.
While he might be laughed at by some here, he is the leading games futurist and he influences investment decisions amongst other things.
Time stamp 56 40
They always say this along with MS can buy Sony and Nintendo!See it's only a matter of posts before a MS fanboy quotes the usual "trillion dollar company". Strange I never really see Apple or Google fanboys doing the same to enforce their opinion? The trillion dollar company slogan hasn't helped MS overtake Google in search or advertising. Nor beat Apple in revenue etc.
See it's only a matter of posts before a MS fanboy quotes the usual "trillion dollar company". Strange I never really see Apple or Google fanboys doing the same to enforce their opinion? The trillion dollar company slogan hasn't helped MS overtake Google in search or advertising. Nor beat Apple in revenue etc.