Is "reframing terminology" anJudging by this thread, "dismemberment abortion" is an impressively effective use of reframing terminology.
Judging by this thread, "dismemberment abortion" is an impressively effective use of reframing terminology.
Why do people care so much about what other people are doing? Everyone has to validate their own decisions by forcing them on to others.
Call it an "area" instead of a line then. There are already tons of examples in life where people do not have control of their own bodies. Suicide is illegal, drugs are illegal, there are lots of things you cannot do to your own body, particularly when they affect or infringe upon the lives of other people.
So I don't think it's hypocritical at all. The only problem is determining when life begins. If somehow all the pro-choice people spontaneously agreed that life began at conception, then there would be no more debate because you simply don't have the right to choose to murder someone.
So the "line" now is currently drawn somewhere else. Is it hypocritical to call yourself pro choice while saying that abortions should not be allowed while a woman is in labor? What's your position on that? You have your own personal line about when abortions should be performed, and presumably for you it's black and white. For me it's not, I don't think the fetus instantly becomes human one moment, I think it becomes human over a period of time, and I don't see why its rights shouldn't reflect that.
She has no memory of that night, Stephanie Chatfield said. She knew only by her appearance and physical condition the next morning that she had been taken advantage of. Three weeks later, she learned that she was pregnant.
If you have no memory of the night, how can you be sure it wasn't consensual?
But that kind of pertains to "when" an abortion is performed. I'm curious as to your original comment, and wondering why it matters as to "how" it occurs.
Because she was drunk; she couldn't have consented.
Why do people care so much about what other people are doing? Everyone has to validate their own decisions by forcing them on to others.
And if the guy who had sex with her was also drunk, did she rape him as well?
Well, the term "humane", by definition, requires humanity. So if we can agree that the humanity forms gradually as opposed to instantaneously, then we should be able to agree that the level of humaneness with which they are treated during the abortion process should also increase accordingly, one step of which would be "abortions are no longer allowed", but perhaps with other increasing degrees of humaneness before that.
And if the guy who had sex with her was also drunk, did she rape him as well?
I'm not an apologist or anything, I just think it's odd to jump to that conclusion.
Dude no matter how disgusting someone's views are, don't downplay that she was a victim of rape. Cmon really?
If you are drunk enough to become black out drunk (which is how drunk she was given that she had no recollection of the night), you can't legally consent.
I once had chocolate ice cream and thought it tasted vile, so now I'm campaigning to have it banned.
That doesn't make me a hypocrite, but I'm still an asshole.
Okay, I see you are getting upset, and that was not my intention. So I'll just leave the thread.
I've heard stories like that before. I've never understood it.Many anti-choice women are convinced that their need for abortion is unique -- not like those "other" women -- even though they have abortions for the same sorts of reasons.
If she believes that it's the wrong choice (in general, not just for her), it's entirely consistent for her to want that choice denied to people. Like a recovering heroin addict would support keeping heroin illegal.
"I did this, it was a mistake. I don't want others to make that same mistake I did. I don't think it's ever the right choice to make."
Come at it as nanny-stating if you want, maybe contrast it to her opinions on healthcare or something, but on its own it's not a hypocritical stance to take.
If you have no memory of the night, how can you be sure it wasn't consensual?
That's not what I'm doing though?
I absolutely agree with this.
Forget this specific incident for a second. What do you call it when two people get blackout drunk and have sex? Mutual rape?
If you are drunk enough to become black out drunk (which is how drunk she was given that she had no recollection of the night), you can't legally consent.
Are you Bill Cosby's lawyer?
I dunno. Maybe make a different thread instead of trying to hijack the thread with irrelevant "But what really IS rape?" bullcrap.
This angle is totally off-topic in a thread about the consequences of sex. In this case, she got pregnant and then got blackmailed over it. I'm pretty sure he didn't, so I don't really care about him here. She's not using the fact of the rape to excuse her decision to abort.
If you wanna muse about the morality of drunk sex, this just isn't the place for it.
And if the guy who had sex with her was also drunk, did she rape him as well?
That's not what I'm doing though?
And if the guy who had sex with her was also drunk, did she rape him as well?
Let's not derail the thread with hypotheticals that aren't germane, because going down that road rarely ends well. She never (as far as we know) made an accusation of rape against anybody from that night so your worry isn't really relevant to why this story is being reported.
Let's please get back on topic.
she dies later in the episode I beleieve
Damn. House going in on that. Does she end up getting the abortion?
Do as I say, not as I do.
I'm one of the good ones.
I cannot find a youtube link to this scene so sorry for the wall of text but it's from E12 S3 of House. The most important part is the last line but I think the whole scene is well written.
snip
What a great example of patriarchy haha. A man telling a woman what she should be doing.
I agree. Male doctors should not be allowed to advice female patients.
The GOP has turned these faux-terms into the hallmark of their political theatrics. I mean, which sounds worse an inheritance tax or a "death tax"? A medical panel or a "death panel"? A terminated pregnancy or a "partial-birth abortion"? The list goes on.Judging by this thread, "dismemberment abortion" is an impressively effective use of reframing terminology.
Would a male OBGYN be mansplaining?
What a great example of patriarchy haha. A man telling a woman what she should be doing.
Yes. Doctors should not be allowed to tell patients what the best course of action, medically speaking, is. Especially not in life or death matters.
To do so would be patriarchy.
Is it the patriarchy if you know he acts like that with all his patients?
So we should ban all men from being medical professionals?
What a great example of patriarchy haha. A man telling a woman what she should be doing.
What a great example of patriarchy haha. A man telling a woman what she should be doing.
(THE FEMALE INTERPRETATION OF) HOUSE: Either every life is sacred or...guys... there is no medical advice being dispensed in that quote. He's basically shaming her.
guys... there is no medical advice being dispensed in that quote. He's basically shaming her.
I know. It will be hard as fuck. It may take centuries. But my utopian side would love to see something like that some day. I definitely cheer for the idea of contraception, more education, a more civilized society. I hope the day comes when men and women can enjoy their sexuality freely and safely without having to go "whoops! Pregnant! Let's just get rid of it" like if it was nothing.
Not because her husband is a republican, but because she and her husband want to ban abortion. I can see why you made that leap, though.People here are jumping on a poor woman who was practically rapped for having an abortion that she regretted and was blackmailed into admitting it just because her husband is a Republican.
(THE FEMALE INTERPRETATION OF) HOUSE: Either every life is sacred or...
EVE: [shouts] Stop it! I don't wanna chat about philosophy!
(THE FEMALE INTERPRETATION OF) HOUSE: You're not killing your rape baby because of a philosophy.
EVE: It's murder! I'm against it. You for it?
(THE FEMALE INTERPRETATION OF) HOUSE: Not as a general rule.
EVE: Just for unborn children?
(THE FEMALE INTERPRETATION OF) HOUSE: Yes! The problem with exceptions to rules is the line drawn. Might makes sense for us to kill the ass that did this to you. But where do we draw the line? Which asses do we get to kill? Which asses get to keep on being asses? Nice thing about the abortion debate is we can quibble over trimesters, but ultimately there's an ice-cold line - birth. Morally, there isn't a lot of difference. Practically, huge.
That do anything for you?
I'm impressed at some of the responses here. She was raped, no sympathy there? Rapist is free obviously, no investigation, no nothing; abortion got you covered.
What's the hypocrisy? She had an abortion and regrets it to this day, can't someone change her views or opinions over time? That's totally her right.
And dismemberment abortion is awful and completely inhumane IMO, just don't do a google image search...
You think women who go through the ordeal of abortion do so like it was nothing?
I realize you have good intentions but you've put your foot in your mouth enough times in this thread. It's time to stop posting.
Okay, I see you are getting upset, and that was not my intention. So I'll just leave the thread.