There are a lot of ways to mitigate leakage. FinFET by design helps. Lower gate voltages (which FinFET enables) help. Advances in doping help.
The CPU in Neo would not be a design win. However, as the new GPU contains a higher CU count that does not exist in the generation of GPUs from which the PS4 GPU that would definitely be a new design and not counted in the original contract for PS4 APU.
If this is all it took, then the likes of Intel and AMD wouldn't all look at things like having more fine grained power gating and more complex throttling mechanisms, but what you said is all true. I'd speculate that the 20nm HP processes at TSMC failed because they couldn't get power under control.
Thats what I was thinking lol!Won't this mean they will be basically be the same thing?
Uhh those semi customs wins for 2h16 and 17. I mean cant MS and Sony,just confirm it now lol.
Actually NX won't be one of the semi-custom wins...
...because it's fully custom. #specialsauce
![]()
They have a semi-custom ARM server win? Ha!
From what I recall, they spun it down. Of course, the Freedom Fabric IP stays with AMD, and will likely continue to bring revenue.That's actually a really surprising one. Wasn't SeaMicro spun down last year because of the lack of demand for ARM servers? Or did they just roll it into AMD instead of a separate division?
If the surprise of the report - the ARM semi-custom server win, is correct (I'm going from posts in this thread), then that would imply the NX is not an ARM SoC, as AMD have a single ARM semi-custom design win.1. One of the projects is supposed to be ARM: How do we know that NX is x86 and not ARM?
The 'beyond gaming' win is most likely the semi-custom ARM server win (I still can't wrap my head around who might be the customer). My curiosity rises, though, with regard to the rumored win with apple. Of course the apple connection could be just a stand-alone Polaris for high-end macs, but (a) that would hardly be semi-custom, and (b) given how Intel are extorting serious moneys from the PC industry with the CoreM/Y, I can't imagine Apple not wanting to test waters with an alternative x86 vendor. At least before they go full metal ; )2. One of the projects is supposed to be "beyond gaming" but not VR, which complicates things. Without that, we would assume PS4K this year, then XB2 next year. The issue with both of these, of course, is platform compatibility and consequences thereof, since the most obvious technical improvements could not or should not be made if backward compatibility is needed. And Microsoft may be unhappy with the way things turned out from their last deal with AMD.
Full nodes are never automatic shrink territory - only half-nodes are. Anyhow, shrinks are not a win per se, because they don't bring a new revenue stream - just a re-negotiation/adjustment to an existing one.4. How is a "shrink" NOT a "design win"? First of all, going from 28nm to 14nm is not classic shrink territory; it is certainly not automatic. The required healthy payments, and the decision to start, essentially mean a new project. But how is that project structurally different from the original "design win," and why would it not be described in the same way?
This year, good grief. I never imagined that after 2013 I'd see two, maybe 3 consoles announced in 2016.
Risk is NX being lost in the noise of PS/XB updates :/
NX has a ridiculous amount of hype behind it though.
From Nintendo Fans sure...
Uhh those semi customs wins for 2h16 and 17. I mean cant MS and Sony,just confirm it now lol.