Fireblend dies, flip town. Scum kill town + Sorian kills town, Sorian leaves. Game ends, scum wins.
Do you think you have like a binding contract with Sorian here?
No.
But then I also think you will flip scum so I trust him more than you.
Fireblend dies, flip town. Scum kill town + Sorian kills town, Sorian leaves. Game ends, scum wins.
Do you think you have like a binding contract with Sorian here?
You're literally turning Sorian into a kingmaker and you're somehow fine with it, when there's a clear alternative that prevents it.
But what do I gain by lying? It would be a purely "lol suckers!" move for no reason. I like to give neutrals a good name, not a bad one.
What does this even mean. You like to win, that's it.
And I know what red checks I got. Again, if I was scum trying to get someone else lynched there were plenty of better targets out there for that.
What does this even mean. You like to win, that's it.
And I know what red checks I got. Again, if I was scum trying to get someone else lynched there were plenty of better targets out there for that.
Also plural checks?
How bout we just lynch Time?
Yeah, it makes sense to lynch Fire today. Even if we're wrong it gives us a lot of info.
Vote: Fireblend
I don't understand why you don't like this plan. If you are town all we have to do is trust Sorian to shoot Time and we win.
Fireblend dies, flip town. Time dies flips scum, scum kill, Sorian leaves.
We get confirmed greenchecks on Penguin, Bronx, Fat and Me. Leaving only L_P as non checked and clearly scum.
This makes so little sense now that I re-read it. "If Sorian is lying about you being scum then you should totally trust him to be on town's side and shoot Time tonight!".
So what happens if FB flips town, Sorian lies and kills someone other than Time and scumTime kills another player?
No one is considering that possibility?
I believe in his checks.Why do you think Fireblend is Town?
So what happens if FB flips town, Sorian lies and kills someone other than Time and scumTime kills another player?
No one is considering that possibility?
I believe in his checks.
I had to run errands at the last second and missed out on the vote.While you are here Bronx, why didn't you vote on Day 6? You were in the thread with just over half an hour to go, the vote was tied. Please explain.
I had to run errands at the last second and missed out on the vote.
Now let's count up.
There's 8 of us left. We've already killed 3 scum and one neutral was killed. There is another neutral among us. I doubt that in a 24 player game there's 5 scum and 2 neutrals, so that would mean there's 1 scum left. If we lynch the right scum today, the game ends immediately with 7 players left and town wins.
Game ends today with 7 players and town wins.
You know who doesn't win? Sorian. Who needs 5 players left to win.
So I ask, what possible reason would Sorian have to help us lynch correctly today?
We have the easiest win imaginable and we're just throwing it away.
Not answering the questions.
You realise if you are town you are doing scum's job for them while Lone_Prodigy is just sitting tight.
Why are you sure there is only 1 scum left?
4 scum, 1 hidden partner, and 2 neutrals is almost 30% of the game roster. Town would basically be screwed from the start.
The Neutral team scum hunts up to a certain point, though.
4 scum, 1 hidden partner, and 2 neutrals is almost 30% of the game roster. Town would basically be screwed from the start.
I agree. Context is key, and in this one trusting the neutral means agreeing to letting them decide who wins the game, and since Sorian is shamelessly lying about me now, guess who I think he's siding with.
Unvote
Bronx's assertion is funny now that I'm sitting thinking on it. Why does it matter if Time is the only scum even if I do decide to be a dick for no reason? You'd still just be 3v1 tomorrow in that case and Fire would be dead with a red check on Time. Town wins automatically anyway. At least Fire is fear mongering from a position that actually makes slight sense.
If it's all the same, I'm happier with the Time shot. Time is a good enough compromise where he might be scum but probably isn't and I don't really want to be the one to end the game because I get screwed here at the end if scum misses their shot for whatever reason and I'm left with the last scum member's head on my plate.
Bronx is who I shoot if I do actually want to kill probably scum and end the game.
Pretty sudden of you, isn't it?Fair enough. Kill Time.
Bronx will get lynched tomorrow.
Pretty sudden of you, isn't it?
VOTE: Faddy
Then you know I did as well. So why even sugggest lynching me?Oh dear lord Bronx. You just said you believed Fireblend's checks. I got a GREEN check. I'm town.
Then you know I did as well. So why even sugggest lynching me?
So you ARE scum.Because I believe Fireblend is a liar.
So you ARE scum.