Vinyl people. Anyone care to sound off on the Fluance RT-25N vs. Project Debut Carbon Evo? Personal impressions, pros/cons/comparisons, etc. Looking to probably get one around Christmas this year.
I'm more drawn to the looks and overall feature set of the Fluance (already have their bookshelf speakers), but I'm given pause to their very entry level aluminum tone arm. But so many other good things- Acrylic platter, nice heavy plinth, great cartridge (and yes, I prefer the Nagaoka MP110 to the Ortofon Blue, and yes I know the Blue presents better "value" being a more expensive cart on a $500 turntable package, but my personal sound preference is for something more balanced and warm, which they say the MP110 has in spades.
But then you have the Evo which is $100 more with the Carbon fiber tone arm, which is a big step up even if you have to sacrifice the acrylic platter (unless you spend another $150 down the road to upgrade to acrylic).
I just keep going back and forth on these.. Any thoughts?
I do use MP110 and I agree its amazing cartridge. My favorite for sure.
Would stay away from low mass arms on any TT.
I think Nagaoka needs at least mid mass arm to properly spread its "wings" so to say.
I can set pressure up to 3g so 1.5 to 2g you need to enjoy proper stylus pressure on Nagaoka is there for sure.
Lots of gimbal bearings and there's also VTA setting on my vintage direct drive Dual turntable. And from what I've read it's not a low mass arm, not a heavy weight champ, but pretty nice mid mass arm.
There's a lot of talking on Polish side of forums on cartridge compliance with arm and whatnot. From what I've read it's all about stiffness of suspension on styli and arm's mass. Haven't really calculated anything I just thought it will sound good and I can set proper stylus pressure.
And yeah it checks out.
Edit: Don't really know all of these new turntables at all. Even my old belt driven Dual turntable I think had better specs than most new turntables so I never did switch to "new is always better". And I still upgraded but stayed on a vintage table.
But a few of new tables did catch my attention. Mainly MOFI turntables and there was this new brand which used old Dual designs. I need to freshen my memory a bit since I have forgotten the name of this brand.
Edit2: check out Rekkord Audio M-500 - old Dual designs with gimbal bearings in arm and subchassis in new turntable.
Other than that Project turntables nor Fluance or anything has caught my attention becase of wow and fluter specs or huge speed drifting.
Yeah, just checked specs of Project Debut Carbon Evo on their site
Speed variance
33: ±0.50% 45: ±0.60%
Wow and flutter
33: ±0.17% 45: ±0.15%
I think I looked at the same table a while back. Measured my old cheapo Dual belt driven table and it measured someting like 0.01% speed variance and 0.10% wow and flutter... So yeah. I never switched to new table after that.
Upgraded to another vintage Dual with direct drive. For a fraction of price of Project like 1/3 of a price and I have 0.05% wow and no speed drift on direct drive...
Rega Planars apparently sound pretty good with Nagaoka for sure. Good compliance.
But I saw speed drift graph a while back an low to medium priced models had awful specs too.
My friend confirmes Regas are good but only pretty high models. Low and mid ones will have specs similar to Debut Carbon Evo.