Hahaha you know what? That actually crossed my mind. I was like is Dice worried about people feeling like losers down at the bottom of the pile with their weak k/d ratios and low score?
Thats what I suspect.
It's such a flawed logic that players will not focus on objectives if they can see their K/D. Maybe fucking idiots who don't know how to play the game anyway. Having no scoreboard at all will only encourage people to not give a fuck entirely. And then you can't even see stats in the menus?
Real battlefield fans who stick around for the long term know what they're doing, but yet again DICE pays little mind to its core audience.
Pretty much, I hope it gets patched back in and simply an option for it to be skipped if someone feels offended by it or something lol
Nah I think they thus far are doing good enough to support a release. Its not saying the scoreboard missing isn't an issue, simply that it missing isn't a mistake. The choice to do this doesn't sound like it has anything to do with not being ready. It sounds like DICE wanted to take some Overwatch like approach to insure team play and not have people JUST worried about kills and K/D ratio etc. So its very likely it will return based on feed back and any more time without a release wasn't going to get us a BF with that scoreboard, for all we know even if you give them 6 months or 1 year and it didn't release, it means they also don't know that a mass majority want the scoreboard back, how can they know if the game didn't come out yet? =)
I've said this before about art to get artist to push out more work. In order to get better, you must do enough work for a critique to find those mistakes to fix them. Not doing the work of couse means the mistake never happens because the art doesn't happen, but it still means the art doesn't happen. Its simply how a lot of this works and with how dynamic software is, its just not something that can just be "ready" most times, that organic feedback is what allow the game to shape, change, alter over time to be something everyone likes or is ok with etc, but it needs that massive feed back though, which means it must release in the first place. Q and A can only do so much and the game just can't live in beta forever. So its not saying this shouldn't be corrected, simply that they are fine to put the game out, let us decide patch later on vs delay.
That's amazing in this age of gaming if scoreboard recaps are crashing the game.
I don't know how much of that is true, but I know not of how that engine works so lol So I'd say unless either of us actually made Frostbite, we don't really know what going on with it if it crashes then as I don't really know what causes that to judge that situation. I don't really even know if that is the real reason behind it missing vs some Overwatch feelings of not wanting to offend people and or no K/D means people will do objective vs kill, kill, kill lol I'm not sure on this one.
Dano could be right, it could be crashing and a tech issue and it will be back later or it could have been a design choice.
I no longer need to continue reading the thread to conclude that the game is trash and I should avoid it at all costs.
The lolz, its still a day 1 for me. Look...the BF community and I'd say most gaming communites tend to exaggearte a fuck ton of things, to the point of us hearing this about like ever BF thats come out
Bad Company add single player, can't go prone (HOLY FUCKING SHIT, well this isn't BF folks ,its cAlL oF dUtY)
Bad Company 2 (more Call Of Duty, no thanks, we want old BF)
BF3 (Team Death Match? why looks like more call of duty and more DLC)
BF4 (this launch is just horrid and its has mall maps like BF3, rips off Call Of Duty...end of days and the DLC splits the community folks)
BF1 (we don't want WWI, were is modern wars? its WOKE)
BFV (WOoooooOOOOOOKE)
So at this point, many of us are use to this whole doom and gloom narrative and those games turned out just fine for millions. So I'd say just play it yourself and see how you feel as I don't think I can tell you how you'd end up feeling about the game. Nothing I post would legit tell you how that would go and you'd just need to find out yourself. I see more good in this then bad and I just can't bitch about, 128 players, bots return, server browser, Portal, free maps and robot dogs.
A lot on that list is also fake btw.
As in number 14 is a complete lie, the destruction is not lessor, its actually more so then the original Bad Company as the New Frostbite Engine does more complex destruction compared to 11 years ago.
I think the person wrote it cause they feel like if it doesn't state "Bad Company 3" zero destruction exist or some dumb shit, they didn't evne fucking play enough to even just judge then, they instead just made up what they thought was the case based on what others have said, but fuck has anyone actually sat there and actually made an attempt to test out the damage on those Bad Company maps to actually see themselves? Instead of trust ones eyes, they listen to someone from Reddit lol Dear god...
I won't just TELL you and you should buy it, I'll show you and you can make up your mind on it, but I feel someone play it to make that choice vs reddit lol They make anything seem like the end of the world folks, using this shit logic no BF should have been successful as they hate all BF launches anyway lol
I'm not saying BUY IT NOW, simply form your own view if you play it vs reddit as a lot of that list is legit lies....
So do you not see why I might have a hard time buying a game based on what they stated when clearly that simply isn't true? I knew it had this level of destruction simply caues BFV has this type of destruction, but if someone isn't going to play a game, get triggered and then post a bunch of lies about it, it means they don't know you can drive a fucking tank into a house in BFV, thus can in BF 2042 etc, they simply think that is ONLY for Bad Company and it must be called Bad Company 3 in order for them to see and know this or something lol Its one of the funniest myths that go around the community of the later games.
. 
