Based on Nvidia posts developers (and probably driver team) don't care about Ampere. Game is Ada optimized only with RT.
Posted in the other thread:
Everything max:
Everything on high (textures on cinematic) and RT medium:
Everything on high (textures on cinematic) and RT OFF, finally playable!
Seems High settings is best
High vs Very High, You can see above in video fps difference.
The game already has RT on right? This rt on options is just the extra rt right?Show one with frame gen off, we will see the difference between high end Ampere and Ada (RT is optimized to Ada according to Nvidia in this game).
Same settings but without frame gen obviously:
Everything on high (textures on cinematic) and RT medium:
Everything on high (textures on cinematic) and RT OFF, finally playable!
I tested the game at 1440p as well, ended up with + - the same results and it's just doesn't make sense to play at 1440p cuz performance is not that much better, 88% of 4K runs at a stable a 30FPS on my rig and 1440p is anything but stable and can't maintain locked 40FPS. Now, of course you can downgrade visuals to Very High but the game is anything but VRAM hungry without RT for this to make sense and I'm perfectly fine with locked 30FPS.No RT, max settings, 100% resolution
I get 54 fps average (62fps max, 47fps low) with your settings. With FG on top of that 98fps average (109fps max, 87fps min). Can you tell me how much fps you get without fps cap?
I honestly can't believe that the game runs so well (perfectly straight line with zero deeps and stutters whatsoever) with this kind of visuals and only eating up 6,5GBs of VRAM at 88% of 4K and 99% of settings at max and without RT (with my GPU at 4K and DLSS even, there's no point in even bother cuz RT is optimized for Frame Gen and much better CPUs). I mean, I'm considering this level of performance on my rig and with my CPU and GPU at max settings and 88% of 4K as great performance so don't at me
Will be removed day one via .ini file edit.
I uninstalled the benchmark already, but if I remember correctly, it was 42-43FPS max on average with fluctuations from 29 to 43 which without VRR is very noticable, very bad and even my G-Sync monitor can't fix it.
Yep. As expected. UE5 NEEDS upscaling. It's Remnants 2 all over again. A lot of the rendering pipeline depends on the resolution, more so than with most engines, so the impact of upscaling is massive. Even with a 4090, I average 65fps at 2560x1440 max settings and no upscaling (100% scale).No RT, max settings, 100% resolution
Without RT? I get 34fps on my 4080S at 1440p with maxed out settings including maxed out RT, and you want to tell me your RTX4090 is 91% faster (64fps)?
Obviously without. Also, I was incorrect. My resolution was 3440x1440, not 1440p.
It was not so obvious to me, because in your original post tou wrote maxed out settings and that should include full RT settings.
You would need 6700XT I guess?
yeah, it will look like shit even if it runs decently
I used the same setting as winjer, but then realized my resolution was still 3440x1440. I probably average around double the performance of a 6800 XT without RT.
Their game design sucks, but in term of tech they are one of the best.But Ubisoft makes AAAA games
I think Nanite is overrated, it is like 8k you have to zoom in to notice and only work for static geometries. I will reserve my final judgement after I played through the whole game.
Cranked it straight up to max settings huh. Cinematic indeed!
I think that's going to be the case. I tried running the game at 4K DLSS performance and without RT I get 99fps. The PS5 is 4x slower compared to my GPU, so IDK what settings they will use to achieve 60fps.
Have you tried Medium? From my understanding, Cinematic is a tier even higher than Very High. PS5 could get by with Medium and FSR Performance Mode at 1440p and DRS. Won't be great but should be alright.
