A bunch of scumbags huh. I believe this is racist. I'm out.
The Jewish Defense League is a recognized right wing terrorist organisation. And in any case, they have no right to initiate an attack, especially if the police is there and was managing to keep the peace until the attack...
A bunch of scumbags huh. I believe this is racist. I'm out.
You don't think terrorists are scumbags?
Jeez.
A bunch of scumbags huh. I believe this is racist. I'm out.
it was classified as "a right-wing terrorist group" by the FBI in 2001.[3][4] According to the FBI, the JDL has been involved in plotting and executing acts of terrorism within the United States.[3]
However, the French branch of the JDL, the Ligue de Défense Juive (LDJ), is not illegal in France.
So Hamas are scumbags according to you then, yes?
Is that right...?
A terrorist organization?
Not permitted to protect their place of worship?
Honestly, you're embarrassing yourself just a little bit.
It seems quite a bit more professional than the sources that you linked which brought speculations and make-believe as facts. The article is a lot more in-depth than the articles you linked which had their 'facts' already debunked by simple process like looking at the synagogues that are supposedly damaged.I find it hilarious the article you mention uses words such as Appears. It's as if the journalist is assuming the JDF started this.
The FBI declared the Jewish Defense League a terrorist organisation back in 2001.A terrorist organization?
They aren't permitted to attack protesters. They are also not the police.Not permitted to protect their place of worship?
Please explain, because it looks like you just told an organisation recognized as terrorists by the FBI is allowed to attack and provoke at that time peaceful protesters.Honestly, you're embarrassing yourself just a little bit.
I wasn't specifically talking about the JDL, but the implied view that the pro-Palestinian protesters were not attempting to attack Synagogues.
I don't in any way think the JDL are a great group, but was a bit surprised that posters were blaming that group over the protestots that were inciting violence.
And now I'm going to sleep.
Anyone who speaks hebrew, can you tell if this is accurate?
https://www.facebook.com/ayelet.benshaul.shaked/posts/596568183794945
The manifestations in France are obviously anti-Jewish. I don't think they give a shit to be honest about what's happening in Gaza and that's why they are considered illegal. I heard some interviews from the protesters, all they were doing were blasting Jews. Little to do with the conflict.
When you have Syria, Egypt, Irak and all the arab-muslim massacres that happened with thousands upon thousands of deaths, which many of them are civilians and not ONE manifestation in France, it gives you an idea.
I really do hope Israel destroys Hamas, but we all know that ain't happening. Only the Palestinian people can destroy Hamas.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqByC-8sW-Q That is one. Do you want two?When you have Syria, Egypt, Irak and all the arab-muslim massacres that happened with thousands upon thousands of deaths, which many of them are civilians and not ONE manifestation in France, it gives you an idea.
What?Funny how 'stop the war' didn't have much to say when Israel accepted the ceasefire, STOPPING the war while Hamas elected to continue the war. They have done sod all about violence during the Arab uprisings and if anything supported Russia's annex of East Ukraine. They are a joke organisation who should change their name to 'stop wars which we can blame the west for'.
Sorry for off topic, I saw their placard and had a fit of rage.
As I admitted my post was off topic, I just wanted to point out the hypocrisy of the 'stop the war' coalition - an off shoot of the socialist workers party, or the socialist party of Britain or whatever the quacks call themselves these days - who feature heavily in those photographs. Separate issue.What?
The Hamas have many things at fault, but you seriously can't hand them the responsibility for the crimea annexion
Also don't forget the aggressive bullying and the settlements of Israel towards palestinensi. Look at the post above you.
Funny how 'stop the war' didn't have much to say when Israel accepted the ceasefire, STOPPING the war while Hamas elected to continue the war. They have done sod all about violence during the Arab uprisings and if anything supported Russia's annex of East Ukraine. They are a joke organisation who should change their name to 'stop wars which we can blame the west for'.
Sorry for off topic, I saw their placard and had a fit of rage.
FYI there's a thread about the demonstration in Paris and its ban
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=857824
And I believe the JDL is a very small bunch of thugs who may actually have started trouble last week although we don't know for sure. They don't have the political influence some of you wrongly assume they have though. We're talking about less than a hundred pretty disorganised individuals. A gang basically.
Byt the way, in France and elsewhere, protests against what's happening in Syria, Lybia, Mali, Yemen, Egypt, Sudan, Iraq and Kenya, altogether combined do not amount to even a fraction of the attention to the conflict in Palestine.
Condemning the Israeli attacks, even being outraged by them, should not preclude to wonder why a conflict that kills hundreds and thousands is so completely shrouding ones that are killing hundreds of thousands.
I thought it was about stopping the 'massacre' of Gazans, to quote their signs.What the hell are you talking about? And you think people give a rats ass about a temporary ceasefire? This is about a lot more than just a ceasefire or temporary truce. It's about freeing Palestine from brutal occupation and oppression, making them sovereign, and not only ending Israel's illegal expansion of settlements, but getting the map back to internationally recognised legal borders, not the current one where Israel is essentially wiping Palestine off the map.
And I don't see how you jump to conclusions on Ukraine or the Arab Spring either, or how they're at all related. Your little outburst of anger in seeing something pro-Palestine leading you to throw caution, logic and compassion to the wind.
There were thousands of Pro Palestine demonstrators and in the same article I referenced it says they were trying to get to the Synagogues. 6 officers got injured, so it's a case of common sense that they were injured stopping the said protesters.
They have often voiced support for Assad and opposed any intervention.Did the stopthewar people demonstrate against Assad or do they only want some wars to stop?
Did you?Did the stopthewar people demonstrate against Assad or do they only want some wars to stop?
I thought it was about stopping the 'massacre' of Gazans, to quote their signs.
If you read my post carefully you would know I was pointing out that this particular organisation is not one to trust in the fight for peace. They don't care about peace at all when it doesn't suit their agenda. People who genuinely care about the lives of Palestinians should just be aware of whose signs they are carrying through he streets. I admitted this wasn't directly about Hamas and Israel.
They have often voiced support for Assad and opposed any intervention.
I'm guessing he is not an organisation who claims they exist to stop war. I also guess he doesn't support the Assad regime, other Arab tyrants and the Russian colonial project. I guess he could though.Did you?
Literally supporting the other side is what means supporting the other side. The voicing of support for Assad, Putin and others has nothing to do with opposing one's own government's actions.And after the whole experience of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria, can't we move on from the idea that opposing our own government's wars doesn't mean supporting the other side?
http://stopwar.org.uk/news/lindsey-...we-are-supporting-the-other-side#.U8qK_LHcSuc
Is very easy to find lacking the demonstrations against war of others when you never go to demonstrations against anything.I'm guessing he is not an organisation who claims they exist to stop war. I also guess he doesn't support the Assad regime, other Arab tyrants and the Russian colonial project. I guess he could though.
Yes I meant that comparison with both the good and bad parts of it. I get that both the USA and Israel want to protect and avenge terrorist attacks against their civilians, but I also think both have gone overboard and killed too many civilians on the way, likely resulting in future terrorists.I'm not sure you want to go with that comparison. The USA's retribution for terrorist acts is something most people view as regrettable, impulsive, and, at times, baseless.
Or maybe that's the perfect analogy.
Literally supporting the other side is what means supporting the other side. The voicing of support for Assad, Putin and others has nothing to do with opposing one's own government's actions.
Also last time I checked Israel wasn't the government in London.
My issue is with this specific organisation. I don't know how many more times I need to make this clear. I'm sure the vast majority of protesters have nothing on their mind but peace for people in the middle east, but the stop the war coalition loves to hijack these protests and claim it as a victory for socialism. You don't know how many times socialists in London would boast to me about how 'they' got a million-strong crowd to come out and protest against the Iraq war, as if it proved that the socialists had inspired people to come out and fight the powers that be, and not just that people from all backgrounds had concerns. A lot of these protesters will have been handed a placard and will be blissfully unaware that it bears the insignia of an organisation who are quite happy to stand by or even voice support when non-Western actors are grinding their own killing machines.Gazan's are being massacred in more ways than just military might. Stop picking and choosing signs when there are so many different types, and look at the bigger picture. You're obfuscating the entire point of the solidarity protest, by picking some random tertiary connection and complaint (Eg don't complain about this war if you didn't complain about others, though I have no idea if you did protest others or not), assuming their intentions, and also digressing to other completely random and unrelated points. This is what you do time and time again. Anything to distance the situation or discussion from pro Palestinian sentiment.
"Free Palestine" "End the siege" "Stop Israeli State Terror" "Stop the War Coalition" "Stop the Massacre" "Stop Israel's Bombings""End Israeli Apartheid" "Stop Israel's War Crimes in Gaza"" Stop the Killing, Free Palestine"and so on.
This is absurd. They are both launching rockets at each other as we speak, why do people not understand that both sides are firing?
Israel has a competent military, while also being capable of protecting their citizens. Are people blaming them for being to prepared? I'm confused by how ill-informed some are.
This is absurd. They are both launching rockets at each other as we speak, why do people not understand that both sides are firing?
Israel has a competent military, while also being capable of protecting their citizens. Are people blaming them for being to prepared? I'm confused by how ill-informed some are.
My issue is with this specific organisation. I don't know how many more times I need to make this clear. I'm sure the vast majority of protesters have nothing on their mind but peace for people in the middle east, but the stop the war coalition loves to hijack these protests and claim it as a victory for socialism. You don't know how many times socialists in London would boast to me about how 'they' got a million-strong crowd to come out and protest against the Iraq war, as if it proved that the socialists had inspired people to come out and fight the powers that be, and not just that people from all backgrounds had concerns. A lot of these protesters will have been handed a placard and will be blissfully unaware that it bears the insignia of an organisation who are quote happy to stand by or even voice support when non-Western actors are grinding their killing machine.
So if I decided to build a fence around your home, and essentially force you to live in an open air prison, you would just passively accept it? Would I be justified in using overwhelming force to eliminate your resistance when you try to get me to leave?
That is what's absurd. You cannot be "defending" yourself when you are an occupying force.
Egypt is occupying Gaza as much as Israel, I wish they would throw some rockets over there for good measure.
"b-b-but they're doing it too!"
Great argument there if it wasn't an utterly ridiculous comparison. Is Egypt also sending in troops, bombing them and and encroaching on their land?
Well they aren't being bombed from there, why would they send in troops? Try harder. Gaza borders two countries and the government there only recognizes one of them. Why can Egypt close its border with Gaza but not Israel? Why is that fact continually being ignored?
Because it isn't fucking Israel's border in the first place.
Well they aren't being bombed from there, why would they send in troops?
Only started following this recently.
Essentially, Israel's occupation and encroaching settlements super pissed off a group of 2.5 million people who are known to kind of already hate Israel. Hamas perceives this threat as existential, so they start launching missile strikes, but Israel is really fucking good at dealing with missile strikes, and retaliates, making the death toll very lopsided.
Approximately correct? Is there merit to the claims of "human shield" action, Israel attempting to warn Palestinians of impending strikes?
Don't take this the wrong way, but is there evidence of this? Just trying to stay clear of possible bias.They send a small bomb as a warning (blow up the roof) and then they send a much bigger bomb.
And when they are bored, they decide to play target practice on the beach where the kids play.