Ryu_Joestar
Member
Assuming you don't have to pay for plus (+ the game isn't even yours to keep)The Last of Us remake is on the PS+, but Nintendo is charging $70 for a port of Breath of the Wild.
Assuming you don't have to pay for plus (+ the game isn't even yours to keep)The Last of Us remake is on the PS+, but Nintendo is charging $70 for a port of Breath of the Wild.
I was not upset at any of that. How many people in reality are all that upset at any of this?Ah yes, overprice previous gen to hell so that the new device will look like a bagain.
The oldest trick in the books. But even if we ignore that Switch 2 itself is more on the expensive side, the accessories are a total dumpster-fire cost-wise. $80 for a controller without even proper triggers and $60 for a shitty 720p webcam? Really? And some people were upset with Portal, lol.
I do not feel ripped off by any of this. The screen looks pretty good to me. And this is a bargain if I have it another four or five years.Nintendo ripping you off with OLED Switch doesn't mean $450 Switch 2 is justifiable.
The history of the Switch 2 reminds me of the 3DS:
The Nintendo 3DS pricing controversy of 2011 offers a fascinating precedent for the current Switch 2 pricing debates. When Nintendo launched the 3DS at $249.99, consumer hesitation led to disappointing sales, forcing a dramatic $80 price cut merely five months after launch. Recognizing the potential backlash from early adopters, Nintendo implemented the "Ambassador Program," granting those who purchased at full price exclusive access to 20 free downloadable games (including 10 NES and 10 GBA titles) as compensation for their loyalty. This gesture, while appreciated by many enthusiasts, highlighted Nintendo's recognition that they had miscalculated market expectations—a lesson that seems particularly relevant as rumors swirl about potential pricing strategies for the Switch's successor.
What games do you want on your Switch 2 Ambassador program?![]()
Yeah I think Nintendo's strategy hinges on whether people are willing to start treating the Switch 2 as their primary console. If you're buying this instead of a PS5 with the expectation that the major current gen games are going to show up on it that's one thing. But if you're buying this as a secondary console or as a console for your kids or your girlfriend $450 is way too much.Switch 2 is going to launch with the successor to the best-selling first-party Switch game, plus third-party games people may actually want to play. It can play current games, current home console games. And it’s going to have more games people may want to play, pretty soon. In a segment of the market where there isn’t really anything comparable at this price point. Completely different situation.
Yeah I think Nintendo's strategy hinges on whether people are willing to start treating the Switch 2 as their primary console. If you're buying this instead of a PS5 with the expectation that the major current Gen games are going to show up on it that's one thing. But if you're buying this as a secondary console or as a console for your kids or your girlfriend $450 is way too much.
Graphics stagnation has gotten to the point that the average person is probably not going to notice a significant difference between Elden Ring or Cyberpunk on Switch 2 vs PS5. So if anything this might force Sony's hand with the PS6, but who knows how much that will cost and if the average consumer will even notice a difference there at the end of the day.
Nintendo is in a strong position going forward. Lateral thinking with withered technology is a much more robust strategy if technological stagnation means there isn't much of a difference between withered and modern tech
You think most people give a shit? Are wages keeping up with inflation? No, they are not.
The big question is GTA6, I think.The problem is that it sits in a weird position of almost being overkill in terms of price and performance as a supplemental Nintendo games console but still underkill to use as a primary console for 3rd party AAA's.
If it managed to get a decent amount of 3rd party AAA games even with subpar performance then I would consider it but right now it's basically Cyberpunk and Elden Ring. Fine but that's only two games and those are technically ports.
I suspect the new Doom and COD 2025 are coming but just haven't been announced.
100% this, you're basically describing my situation lol. I don't have any interest in this as it would be a tertiary device next to PS5 and PC, yet i'll consider buying one if my family really wants it (not the case rn). You're also spot on with regards to diminishing returns in the graphics department. I can well imagine the cross gen period between PS5 and PS6 being even longer than previous gens because of that, with PS6 becoming a niche premium segment for quite some time.Yeah I think Nintendo's strategy hinges on whether people are willing to start treating the Switch 2 as their primary console. If you're buying this instead of a PS5 with the expectation that the major current gen games are going to show up on it that's one thing. But if you're buying this as a secondary console or as a console for your kids or your girlfriend $450 is way too much.
Graphics stagnation has gotten to the point that the average person is probably not going to notice a significant difference between Elden Ring or Cyberpunk on Switch 2 vs PS5. So if anything this might force Sony's hand with the PS6, but who knows how much that will cost and if the average consumer will even notice a difference there at the end of the day.
Nintendo is in a strong position going forward. Lateral thinking with withered technology is a much more robust strategy if technological stagnation means there isn't much of a difference between withered and modern tech
Yeah, and at least PS5 had no load times as a major quality of life feature to convince people to upgrade in the absence of genuine next-gen exclusive games. The difference between PS5 and PS6 is going to be even less noticeable, the cross gen period is going to be just as long if not longer, PS6 is probably going to be extremely expensive, and backwards compatibility and ~$10 next-gen game upgrade DLC means pretty much everyone is going to just say to themselves "eh, I'll wait and see." And if Nintendo ever drops the Switch 2's price that'll turn into "eh, I'll get a Switch 2 for now instead."100% this, you're basically describing my situation lol. I don't have any interest in this as it would be a tertiary device next to PS5 and PC, yet i'll consider buying one if my family really wants it (not the case rn). You're also spot on with regards to diminishing returns in the graphics department. I can well imagine the cross gen period between PS5 and PS6 being even longer than previous gens because of that, with PS6 becoming a niche premium segment for quite some time.
Sony is just going to do it now that the Big N has!The outrage comes from both the fact that Mario Kart World costs $80 for seemingly no reason, and the whole sloppy manner in which Nintendo revealed Switch 2's game prices. Especially since Mario Kart, while looks good, doesn't look good enough to justify the high price tag. And given that people are on edge about recent economic concerns, it just comes off as looking greedy and/or tone deaf to a lot of gamers.
Nintendo can simply fix this problem by coming clean, explaining their pricing decisions clearly to the customers, and even backtracking on a few of them. This is a problem of their own making, but its one they can very easily fix.
512 for the future OledSurprised there are this many Nintendo defenders. Gotta call a spade a spade. We know Nintendo never sell consoles at a lost but this is ridiculous. 1TB onboard memory should be mandated by law especially now that everything must be downloaded. 256gb is nothing
That's pretty much what they needMake new games $70
Digital games $60
Switch 2 re-releases $50
Upgrades $10 (or free)
You got a like for thisSteam Deck costs less and the games are free.
UFS storage has scaled so slowly over the years. Top end phones still have 512 GB, just kinda sucks.In some ways it's kinda ridiculous that a console is shipping with 256GB in 2025. Slim Xbox 360/PS3's shipped with that amount like 15 years ago and they didn't have the file sizes of the PS4+ era.
This strategy can only work if you are cheaper than the competition. And even then it might not. See Xbox series S.Yeah I think Nintendo's strategy hinges on whether people are willing to start treating the Switch 2 as their primary console. If you're buying this instead of a PS5 with the expectation that the major current gen games are going to show up on it that's one thing. But if you're buying this as a secondary console or as a console for your kids or your girlfriend $450 is way too much.
Graphics stagnation has gotten to the point that the average person is probably not going to notice a significant difference between Elden Ring or Cyberpunk on Switch 2 vs PS5. So if anything this might force Sony's hand with the PS6, but who knows how much that will cost and if the average consumer will even notice a difference there at the end of the day.
Nintendo is in a strong position going forward. Lateral thinking with withered technology is a much more robust strategy if technological stagnation means there isn't much of a difference between withered and modern tech
The price of the console is fine, I think most people will agree that $450 is a fair price for this system. The problem really is just some of the game prices, and Nintendo's lack of communication in this regard.Just drop the price. Yes, that simple.
Most Nintendo 1st party games are aiming for 20GB and under.In some ways it's kinda ridiculous that a console is shipping with 256GB in 2025. Slim Xbox 360/PS3's shipped with that amount like 15 years ago and they didn't have the file sizes of the PS4+ era.
I think most people will agree that $450 is a fair price for this system.
Of course not. You're paying a premium for hardware features like portability AND "a few Nintendo games," which is a pretty disingenuous way to characterize what are typically among the best selling, highest rated exclusives in gaming. But we all know this.What? I think $350 would be fair but not this. The Series S is a more capable machine and it comes at $350 for 1TB of storage. You can get the Series X for the same price as a Switch 2 and the graphics would be far better, and the games cheaper. Would parents even get Switch 2's and Nintendo games for $500+ when the Switch 1 can play them fine?
The processor is also reportedly more underpowered than impressions would lead you to believe and I think the issues will crop up this year or next year. Is it really worth paying a massive premium just for a few Nintendo games?
Ahhh no mam....I think people will be willing to stomach the $80 pricing if Nintendo was more upfront about their reasons behind it.
A month of PS+ Extra is $15. In my country I got a year of PS+ Deluxe for the same price of Breath of the Wild.Assuming you don't have to pay for plus (+ the game isn't even yours to keep)
How many kids do you think are here at neogaf arguing about Nintendo switch? We don't need parents here, we got money to buy stuff.What? I think $350 would be fair but not this. The Series S is a more capable machine and it comes at $350 for 1TB of storage. You can get the Series X for the same price as a Switch 2 and the graphics would be far better, and the games cheaper. Would parents even get Switch 2's and Nintendo games for $500+ when the Switch 1 can play them fine?
The processor is also reportedly more underpowered than impressions would lead you to believe and I think the issues will crop up this year or next year. Is it really worth paying a massive premium just for a few Nintendo games?
Nothing like the 3DS and Wii U situation. You are simply not comparing apples with apples. The Wii and DS were both very new markets and customers for Nintendo. In the past they had been in the core space compeating for the regular console customers but the GameCube ended that and they stopped going for power. The main issue with this was part of the DS and Wii U's success was the early implementation of touch and motion controls which tempted a lot of casual people that had never really bought a console before. Then motion controlls pretty much died and cheap tablet devices offering touch controls became more accessible and a lot the customers were simply not there to upgrade to the new devices. The Switch is in a totally different position and even I am not sure how Nintendo have managed this.The history of the Switch 2 reminds me of the 3DS:
The Nintendo 3DS pricing controversy of 2011 offers a fascinating precedent for the current Switch 2 pricing debates. When Nintendo launched the 3DS at $249.99, consumer hesitation led to disappointing sales, forcing a dramatic $80 price cut merely five months after launch. Recognizing the potential backlash from early adopters, Nintendo implemented the "Ambassador Program," granting those who purchased at full price exclusive access to 20 free downloadable games (including 10 NES and 10 GBA titles) as compensation for their loyalty. This gesture, while appreciated by many enthusiasts, highlighted Nintendo's recognition that they had miscalculated market expectations—a lesson that seems particularly relevant as rumors swirl about potential pricing strategies for the Switch's successor.
What games do you want on your Switch 2 Ambassador program?![]()
I only we stopped buying oil from barbaric regime like Saudi Arabia, imagine the great PR!from a PR perspective? it is.
Surprised there are this many Nintendo defenders. Gotta call a spade a spade. We know Nintendo never sell consoles at a lost but this is ridiculous. 1TB onboard memory should be mandated by law especially now that everything must be downloaded. 256gb is nothing
This. And I think Nintendo will have produced just only relatively limited quantity. They probbaly want to sell all their Switch 1 stock beforeThe system will sell out everywhere for a long period of time.
Here is a list of Nintendo consoles and handhelds released in the USA, their original MSRP, and their adjusted prices for 2025 based on inflation:
Console Name Original MSRP Adjusted Price (2025) Nintendo Entertainment System (NES) $199 $649.15 Game Boy $89 $257.95 Super Nintendo Entertainment System (SNES) $199 $543.65 Virtual Boy $179 $434.48 Nintendo 64 $199 $468.96 Game Boy Color $69 $153.27 Game Boy Advance $99 $201.25 GameCube $199 $404.53 Nintendo DS $149 $277.18 Wii $249 $436.62 Nintendo 3DS $249 $376.63 Wii U $349 $512.52 Nintendo Switch $299 $378.76 Nintendo Switch Lite $199 $237.62 Nintendo Switch OLED $350 $393.93
pre-owned games lmao! Even those are as expensive as recent releases on other platforms. LMAO. Why is this crying about me being obsessed and not caring? who says I don't care? Do you want me to stop hammering you with facts and good arguments? Should I give you break, little tulip?