By "all" do you mean the single instance of a single card with multiple "themes" specifically called out by the developer?
. . .some interesting kneejerk reactions here.
I mean this. Look at the composition; it's
ALL the same. The top two center are mirrored but otherwise the framing & composition is exactly the same.
I know that you've only got a limited amount of space on a card for your art, but considering the drawings are done full-sized before getting scaled down for the card, that excuse doesn't hold up even when the artist has to account for readability. There's nothing unique or varied if these compositions, aside maybe the "Zapicide" card.
Well, hard disagree. Nothing wrong with slightly different styles in a cards series, if desired by the client, and what I see there is a blend of some of the different styles seen in the last 30 years between JP comics, cards, the recent Jaroslav Kosmina art pieces, or even videogames.
Ironically since we're speaking of AI, each and any of those perfectly captures the IP soul to me, be it the Crichton book, 35mm movie, and the tons of EU material. Maybe not for a casual who ony saw the movie, I guess.
The recent Magic cards, those were not "stylistically uniform" in the slightest.
The style difference we see in the AI board/card game is more akin to the one you'd see between the main Kenner cards (the vertical ones in the picture below), and the Die-Cast ones (the horizontal ones).
Well, look...I'm not going to say I'm the most invested in intimate knowledge WRT Jurassic Park. I have only seen the movies, so in that sense yeah, maybe I am a casual to the IP. I'll admit that.
However, the 'Kenner' cards you list here...you can say the AI-based cards of similar of the newer ilk you originally posted look virtually identical. But this is what I start to mean when I say AI can be a "decent imitator" but lacks the "soul" of what it's imitating.
I'm comparing the Kenner card art to this particular artwork from the initial post you made. The artwork on the Kenner cards look more clearly like detailed colored pencil or maybe acrylics. They have a quality that works well with the natural properties and limitations of those mediums.
The pic I have here seems like it's emulating something like an oil paint medium-wise but it has a color palette more in line with colored pencils or pastels. But that isn't actually the issue IMO; the issue is that the AI pic here is (IMO) trying to emulate aspects of those mediums, and maybe the specific art style of those Kenner cards, but without any of the inherent properties or 'limitations' of those actual mediums IRL.
So if it's trying to emulate a style specific to those cards, it just ends up looking kind of uncanny to me. Inhuman. Like I can
tell a human didn't create the piece, even assuming it were a person doing the drawing digitally.
It doesn't matter because we'll never find out, and speculation just creates bias; only thing we do know, is that he's getting paid good for the time being, which also means he doesn't need to "prove" anything to anyone, cept deliver the work his employer requests.
Yes.
I'm not necessarily in disagreement with you on this point. On the
business side of the topic, yes, them leveraging the tech is "smart" and they don't have to prove anything to others, including myself. They just need to prove they can provide the content their employer is paying them for.
However, I'm very confident in saying this artist wouldn't be very well respected by many of their fellow peers, and compared to artists I know and admire, can't say their artwork impresses me at a creative level especially knowing what specific thing they're using to help make it.