Because the switch isWhy the hell is this on Switch... Civ VI had sacrifices running in it. Not sure how ambitious this will be now.
August '24I wish there was a bit of gameplay...
because the port of 6 "significally exceeded expectations"Why the hell is this on Switch... Civ VI had sacrifices running in it. Not sure how ambitious this will be now.
To be fair, the last Civ game with ambition was Civ 4.Not sure how ambitious this will be now.
To be fair, the last Civ game with ambition was Civ 4.
Don't worry, as soon as they figure out how to apply this to XCOM, we gonna see XCOM 3.Civ 6 was very ambitious....
...at selling the most DLCs.
The biggest deal is the Ram. Limiting yourself to making a strategy game that works on a 4gb device in 2025, especially when Nintendo's next console will be out, is not something I was expecting. Civ VI did chug at the end of turns on the Switch too lategame so yeah, they also need to make sure all the AI and other processing runs in a reasonable time on a 2017 mobile cpu.because the port of 6 "significally exceeded expectations"
also it's not like civ games necessitate of raw power to get better, it's all about systems and how they work as a whole
i gave up hope on actual AI in civs gamesThe biggest deal is the Ram. Limiting yourself to making a strategy game that works on a 4gb device in 2025, especially when Nintendo's next console will be out, is not something I was expecting. Civ VI did chug at the end of turns on the Switch too lategame so yeah, they also need to make sure all the AI and other processing runs in a reasonable time on a 2017 mobile cpu.
I know but those cinematics trailer (like Dune) don't worth it in my opinion, no gameplay = no idea how it will be.August '24