Exactly. I wonder what the RT would have been...What about it? They're different enough that a whole new set of reviews would need to be gathered in order to determine a critical consensus. As much as it sucks, the TC is still the version most people saw and the version most people remember. The UC is a completely separate discussion.
Exactly. I wonder what the RT would have been...
Guys that pic is awful, I'm sorry.
Think the costumes for the middle three look weird and a little off, specifically flash and other dude. I dunno, maybe I'm in the minority.How so?
Think the costumes for the middle three look weird and a little off, specifically flash and other dude. I dunno, maybe I'm in the minority.
Think the costumes for the middle three look weird and a little off, specifically flash and other dude. I dunno, maybe I'm in the minority.
I agree. WW looks especially awful.Nope, I agree. Like I said earlier, it's horrible besides Ben and Momoa. And even Ben, what's with the goofy frown unless they're starting down parademons or Deathstroke has a gun to Aflred's head
Think the costumes for the middle three look weird and a little off, specifically flash and other dude. I dunno, maybe I'm in the minority.
I wonder how fast this Flash will be. He better be the fastest on the team because Superman is pretty damn fast.
Think the costumes for the middle three look weird and a little off, specifically flash and other dude. I dunno, maybe I'm in the minority.
Does Ray Fisher actually look like that or has it be glossed up, he has such a babyface in that pic. Looks like a teen, as in high school
Maybe that Teen Titans movie isnt so questionable
Wilkinsom dropped the ball with Flash. We cann agree with that, right?
It looks like shit no matter it's origin that's the problem.Nope. If the set reports were correct, it's meant to be a handmade/homemade mish-mash. That looks like a handmade mish-mash.
Flash and Cyborg look awful.
Like a horrible mash up of bits of metal and plastic stuck to a costume.
Jagged bits and lines everywhere.
What happened to keeping it fucking simple?
And HQ version
It looks like shit no matter it's origin that's the problem.
It reminds me of the live action transformer movies.
That is not a good thing to be reminded of.
We've seen the final suit in artworks. It's better, but still, I dunno, not "flash" enough.Nope. If the set reports were correct, it's meant to be a handmade/homemade mish-mash. That looks like a handmade mish-mash.
We've seen the final suit in artworks. It's better, but still, I dunno, not "flash" enough.
Maybe Deadpool 2 will bomb and we will finally be able to unite the seven.Batman and Aquaman look great, but the rest are awkward and frankly bad. Also doesn't feel right without GL
I get the sense the only part of the final act shown is a brief glimpse in the BTS video.
Part speculation, part reading stories on production,the JL join together in a specific order. Starts with Batman and WW. Batman recruits the other three. Flash immediately joins. Cyborg joins later, I believe in the scene with Gordon. Those four go underground to investigate parademons. At a point Aquaman joins them. Scenes of those five going to the batcave. Later, it appears Flash, Aquaman, and WW are in Metropolis. So, sounding like a hefty amount without Superman.
Bigger.
I think the Flash looks better here than in most of the other stills. I think he'll look better in motion. Batman reminds me of Arkham Knight Batman. I do agree WW looks a little weird.
If you're saying I only read people's opinions because I agree with them, you'd be wrong. Of course I'm going to read people who thoughts line up with my own but I don't read Wesley Morris and Armond White because of confirmation bias. Those guys have viciously torn down movies I've liked. Go read what Morris wrote about MoS.No offense, but I think you're only saying that because they don't reinforce your preexisting opinions. Even if you look at what the industry would consider the best of the best among critics, movies like BvS were not well received. Aggregates like Metacritic that closely curates the source of scores still tend to run in parallel with RT's actual scoring system. This isn't to say critical consensus is infallible, but that doesn't mean they are inherently flawed either. Any time anyone does some actual critique and analysis though, people tend to reject it if it doesn't reinforce their own opinion.
There's a temptation to view opinion as black and white, without nuance, as simply a binary spectrum of good or bad like you're describing. And yes, RT reinforces that pitfall with their RT%, but it's not like the % score is a difficult concept to properly understand as the most generalized of recommendations.