• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Do you believe that exclusive games receive a slight “exclusivity” bump with review scores?

FoxMcChief

Gold Member
Certain publishers, Stellar Blade for example is a good example of that. Sony published game with some TA but really nothing to shout about if you take those two things away you would have never heard anything about it.
One could argue that some of the games get hit negatively because of T&A though.

Hmmm. Maybe the better fitting question in 2025 is, is Woke-flation in reviews real?
 

Danjin44

The nicest person on this forum
In age of internet you have so much information about game before it comes you can probably guess if you gonna be in to it or not.

I don’t think I ever skip or bought a game based on review scores.
 

ZehDon

Member
It certainly happened back in the time of platform-dedicated publications. Xbox, PlayStation, and Nintendo dedicated magazines definitely delivered inflated scores for first party titles. Stands to reason that's still happening for the limited number of platform-dedicated publications. For platform-agnostic, it's all about preaching to their choir. Give them what they want to hear and you'll get those 9s and 10s. That's not controversial, that's just logic.
 
Stellar Blade is fantastic, what are you smoking?
There wasn’t enough there to keep me engaged. Plus the levels seemed pretty flat and the texture and models were reused often and a lot of the same enemies. It just felt incomplete to me.

One could argue that some of the games get hit negatively because of T&A though.

Hmmm. Maybe the better fitting question in 2025 is, is Woke-flation in reviews real?
Impacts from both sides most likely.
 

TintoConCasera

I bought a sex doll, but I keep it inflated 100% of the time and use it like a regular wife
Of course. Review scores are worthless and just marketing after all. I assume that paying for good scores or even scaring the shit out of the reviewers with them not getting early review copies of your next games are common practices.

Source? Common sense really. There's nothing stopping them from doing so.
 

Aenima

Member
You see more discussion around here about the women in the game or the gameplay?
We talking about the reviwers not GAF. Stellar Blade and Eve became a banner among player for bringing back beauty a sexy woman back to the videogames. Reviwers were not happy about that though and thers multiple articles shaming the game and the devs.
 
Last edited:
29a834051ab514df460ff5670b9c70b4.png


Kingdom Come 2 is 47th best PS5 game, not as good as masterpieces like Deathloop, Horizon Forbidden West or Ratchet, but slightly better than Hi Fi Rush tho hehe
 

Fbh

Member
Not really.
I think reviewers are more prone to give a slight boost to established IP that they like, and stuff that triggers their nostalgia, just like everyone else.
 
Last edited:
We talking about the reviwers not GAF. STellar Blade and Eve became a banner among player for bringing back beauty a sexy woman back to the videogames. Reviwers were not happy about that though and thers multiple articles shaming the game and the devs.
It rolls up to reviewers just the same.
 

TintoConCasera

I bought a sex doll, but I keep it inflated 100% of the time and use it like a regular wife
Kingdom Come 2 is 47th best PS5 game, not as good as masterpieces like Deathloop, Horizon Forbidden West or Ratchet, but slightly better than Hi Fi Rush tho hehe
Deathloop getting 10/10 up the ass on release was the funniest shit, I don't know how people still take those outlets seriously.
 
The problem is that reviewers have gotten lenient, lazy, and fanboyish 'all of the platform specific review sites' which results in higher scores being easy to get now. Literally anything that isn't a broken mess gets a 75 plus at least when it should be more like like a 65 or below. There's too many mid games nowadays being scored as good to great games. Back in the day it was much much harder to get a 85 plus game grade let alone anything 90 or above.
 

EN250

Member
How the "xbox tax" meme started, remember? "reviewers are giving low scores to MS exclusives", so some of the MS fanboys with their little social media sites started to review games to counter these supposedly low reviews from the other sites

if biased af, like for example Pushsquare or Nintendowhatever or these new Xbox sites, then yes
Remember how these review sites were pushing these awful games like Veilguard as some amazing game to prop up "the message"?

If agenda driven like what I'm describing above, then yes
 

Crayon

Member
Maybe up, maybe down. Whatever it is, it definitely affects the conversation.

"Belda" is a joke, but I think there's a kernel of truth to it. BOTW was an easy game to get a bad impression of, with a lot of people finding the brilliance after sticking to it. If it was "belda", I think plenty of reviewers would have decided to focus on what it didn't have rather than what it had. It was "zelda" though, so at the point where they would have come away from belda with a certain review, they had faith that zelda must be much better than the average game.

So in that example, botw was not overrated, but belda would have been underrated.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Don't most of us agree that OOT earned its status as highest ranking game ever though? Not saying there's no bias, but is that the example?

Ocarina has its score based on 22 reviews only.

The average game releasing today often has upwards of 100 reviews. Such a large pool would have meant it wouldn't have kept its 99 back in the day either.
 

MiguelItUp

Member
I believe the best review scores/opinions are your own, as any other review is subjective. Which means potentially affected by personal opinions, and bias. It'd be silly to think otherwise IMO. Especially nowadays.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Is your point that Ocarina actually was reviewer bias or something?

No, just that I don't think it would have maintained a 99 if there were half as many outlets reviewing games now as there were back then.

It's a fantastic game, just making a comment on its near-perfect 99 score.
 

TintoConCasera

I bought a sex doll, but I keep it inflated 100% of the time and use it like a regular wife
No, just that I don't think it would have maintained a 99 if there were half as many outlets reviewing games now as there were back then.

It's a fantastic game, just making a comment on its near-perfect 99 score.
I'm not a numbers guy, but don't statistics "laws" tells us that, if you get a result with 20 chances, you should get the same result with 200?
 

TintoConCasera

I bought a sex doll, but I keep it inflated 100% of the time and use it like a regular wife
I honestly prefer banjo kazooie over mario 64 which is probably blasphemy to say lol. I even prefer donkey kong 64 over mario 64. Rare were on another level back in those days.
Don't say too loud lmao, but hey I agree! specially about Banjo. Click Clock Woods might be the best level ever in a 3d platformer, from concept and design to it's execution and, of course, the music.
 
Last edited:
Do you think it happens, or did but not anymore? Just curious.
Exclusives like Returnal, Astro Bot and others are getting better reviews because they're built around DualSense and 100% of reviews are based on DualSense gameplay.
Astro and Returnal would both get much lower scores if reviewed on Xbox via Xbox controllers that just rumble - they wouldn't be the same game.
DualSense games shouldn't have the same name/title as non-DualSense games to eliminate any confusion and guarantee accurate game reviews.
 
Last edited:
Don't most of us agree that OOT earned its status as highest ranking game ever though? Not saying there's no bias, but is that the example?
Did GTA: VC, GTA: SA, GTAIV, GTAV, LOZ: OOT, LOZ:SS, LOZ:TP, LOZ:BotW, and LOZ:TOTK all deserve not only 95+ but in several instances 99 and 100 aggregates?
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom