Dragon Age: The Veilguard User Reviews on Metacritic Are an Abysmal 3.7/10 on Console (2.2/10 on PC)

dragon-age.png


Dragon Age: The Veilguard released on October 31st on PC, PS5, and Xbox Series X|S. Right now on Metacritic, the PC version boasts a 79, while the PS5 version boasts an 84.

In stark contrast to these respectable scores is its user review score on Metacritic, which is a 3.7 out of 10 across nearly 3,000 user reviews, and counting. This makes it one of the lowest rated games of 2024, when filtering by Metacritic user review.

kcDOvBa.jpeg


Dragon Age: The Veilguard sales, based on Steam data, seem underwhelming so far, though far from poor. Only time will tell what the impact the various campaigns for and against the game will have on its sales. It is pretty evident it is not going to light the world on fire commercially, or even come close to matching RPG hits of the last few years like Elden Ring, Hogwarts Legacy, Black Myth: Wukong, and Baldur's Gate 3.

gI9aBvU.jpeg



Social Justice Comedy GIF by CBS
 
Because user scores almost never have anything to do with the actual game.

I'm not playing this because of the SJW agenda garbage, but I'm not giving it a review either.
 
I mean... how meaningful is this information, really? We all knew it'd get review bombed. It'd get bombed even if the game turned out to be good.
Not meaningful at all, agreed. Steam reviews are at 75% and PSN reviews at 8.9/10 which are better than I thought they'd be.
 
Personally I put zero stock in metacritic reviews. No accountability whatsoever on whether any of the people leaving a "review" actually played the game.
 
dragon-age.png


Dragon Age: The Veilguard released on October 31st on PC, PS5, and Xbox Series X|S. Right now on Metacritic, the PC version boasts a 79, while the PS5 version boasts an 84.

In stark contrast to these respectable scores is its user review score on Metacritic, which is a 3.7 out of 10 across nearly 3,000 user reviews, and counting. This makes it one of the lowest rated games of 2024, when filtering by Metacritic user review.

kcDOvBa.jpeg


Dragon Age: The Veilguard sales, based on Steam data, seem underwhelming so far, though far from poor. Only time will tell what the impact the various campaigns for and against the game will have on its sales. It is pretty evident it is not going to light the world on fire commercially, or even come close to matching RPG hits of the last few years like Elden Ring, Hogwarts Legacy, Black Myth: Wukong, and Baldur's Gate 3.

gI9aBvU.jpeg



Social Justice Comedy GIF by CBS
I think the game looks like hot shit, as in the act of pressing buttons results in boredom... let alone the terrible writing and self insterts.

But I can also see this is just silly review bombing when majority of the reviews are 0/10

none of what is in the game was hidden before launch, if a bunch of turkeys bought the game and then felt it was a 0 then i gotta say they deserve it.

This sort of play is just ammunition for the kotakus and doesn't reach the developers/publishers, men in suits.
 
Last edited:
You guys are fucking sheep.

Don't you see? Don't you get it?

The Chuds paid off all the users for that score.

And you fucking fell for it. Typical Gaf.
 
Last edited:
I don't trust either reviewer/journalist scores nor user scores that don't require buying the game. Although User scores are still better than journalist/reviewer scores if I have to pick one of the lesser evil. Steam score are usually the most accurate.
 
Can't trust critics, can't trust users…

Man I miss the good ol days of console wars
 
CohhCarnage, the most diplomatic and safe streamer out there called the writing "as if it was written for a 4 year old" and " one of the worst writing I've seen" .
 
Game is woke but let's not pretend metacritic user reviews are serious .

Console wars , trolls, ranting , haters all affect the user review scores.
 
I'm struggling to think of anything more pathetic than leaving a review for a game you've never played, just to annoy people on the other side of a fucking stupid political argument than you.
 
I'm struggling to think of anything more pathetic than leaving a review for a game you've never played, just to annoy people on the other side of a fucking stupid political argument than you.
"Pathetic" seems like an adequate word to describe the current state of public discourse on just about anything
 
Steam reviews are much more reliable than MC user scores from people that havent touched the game but have their own agenda.

Just saying
 
Holy shit at Schrier on Twitter

'i dont actually like the game but I like seeing you chuds owned'

Holy shit, so if you dont like this game your a chud?

Whats wrong with these people?
 
From what I've seen so far the game is a 6/10, perhaps a 7 at times.

- boring repetitive puzzles
- good gameplay
- story somewhat interesting
- good looking environments
- immersion breaking modern SJW dialogue
- generally weak dialogue
- no blood magic
- whats with the oversized heads on almost all characters?
- weak character creator
 
Now do Steam where it's doing fine.

Stop with the hate train. It leads to nowhere.
73%... all they had to do to avoid the shit user reviewing on metacritic was not write the story, characters, and scenes as if it were theater kids doing larping in a liberal arts college. the 84 from journos would probs have made sense if that was the case.
 
Metacritic is already pointless, but the user score is even worse. People rating anything but the game itself.
- Trying to punish something they don't like like DEI content
- Console fanboys spamming 10s for exclusive games they eventually never played and 0s for the competition's games they 100% never played.
 
Last edited:
So user reviews from actual purchasers on Steam weren't negative enough, so the gameplan now is to cling to Metacritic user reviews that are functionally useless?

Old Men Laughing GIF by ABC Network
 
3.7 seems low since the game is actually functional. With the writing I've seen in an RPG that started life out as extremely dark and almost horror like in places, I can't see why anyone would give this more than a 5.
 
From what I've seen so far the game is a 6/10, perhaps a 7 at times.

- boring repetitive puzzles
- good gameplay
- story somewhat interesting
- good looking environments
- immersion breaking modern SJW dialogue
- generally weak dialogue
- no blood magic
- whats with the oversized heads on almost all characters?
- weak character creator

'Seen'? Not even played?

My word 🤣

Not meaningful at all, agreed. Steam reviews are at 75% and PSN reviews at 8.9/10 which are better than I thought they'd be.

Well, there it is.
 
Top Bottom