What do you think professional broadcasters are like? The top guys in these industries will always be ruthless and aggressive. As long as they're entertaining, I don't care.It's interesting that many Twitch streamers seem like sketchy fuckers at best and absolute human garbage at worst (pedophiles etc.).
Even if all these allegations turn out to be a nothingburger, I still wouldn't want to talk to this guy, he seems like an asshole.
How many people called Micheal Jackson one even in TV episodes of shows? There are settlements and everything is "legal" in those instances. To sue for defamation you would have to prove the information given is false. I'm not sure that is going to happen. Possibly but unlikely I would say.Time to sue for defamation.
I don’t care about the doctor. But if you call someone a pedo that is serious. Defamation or career death.
I think there is a fairly significant fall in morality between cheating on one's wife and hounding underage girls.He was unfaithful to his wife and came on stream crying about it to farm views 5 or 6 years ago. Who knows if these allegations are true, but it wouldn't be surprising in the least.
I dunno man, when men get to a certain age and level of success you don't often see them divorcing their wife and trading for an older, more rough looking woman. Unless they are King Charles, then they get the rumours anyway.I think there is a fairly significant fall in morality between cheating on one's wife and hounding underage girls.
Nice, reddit and resetera are your sources?
LOL millennials reading this probably thinking "WTF does Sam Fisher's voice actor got to do with this?"LOL yeah ok Ironside.
It's interesting that many Twitch streamers seem like sketchy fuckers at best and absolute human garbage at worst (pedophiles etc.).
Speculating on a situation isn't considered slander. Not that it has ever happened but if a GAF mod banned somebody out of the blue, a user that was known to be bringing in millions of visitors then clearly something is afoot. There would be a reason that would be hidden in settlements or other legal avenues. If some rumour starts going round that it's because they sexted/pmed some minor and others started speculating on it it isn't considered slander. The person making the accusation would have to be taken to court but others can side how they want, it isn't defamation or slander.People coming into this thread, accusing him of pedophilia and other insane crimes, and then trying to duck behind "that's just my 2 cents based on nothing" is the biggest caveman behavior I've seen on GAF in a while.
I would just like to remind you guys that slander is a real crime, and "but that's just my opinion" ain't going to cut it in that instance.
I wonder how you would feel when a GAF mod would ban you without context, and you'd have to watch how the forum go "Damn, for GAF to ban him out of nothing, it sure had to be something Insane! I bet he's a pedophile!".
But that's just my 2 cents based on nothing.
Is the second line I wrote explaining how this is pure speculation based on circumstantial evidence and hearsay invisible or are you being intentionally obtuse?
All part of the drama farming industrial complex until some line is crossed.I’m really out of the loop, but aren’t like 90% of the bans of well known Twitch personalities really just suspensions?
He's not the one pursuing a witch hunt based on hearsay.
Nah, Twitch is a shit show when it comes to enforcement. They did the same to Destiny (mostly progressive political streamer) without giving a concrete reason. Meanwhile political streamers that agree with Twitch politics can literally say horrible things and don't get bans.I’m really out of the loop, but aren’t like 90% of the bans of well known Twitch personalities really just suspensions? Twitch profits off these people. So for DrDisrespectful to actually be banned from the platform means he either did something terrible that the streaming platform wants to distance itself from (meaning the money DrDisredpectful made for the platform wasn’t worth the bad publicity) or he pissed off a senior exec and they made him an example.
Again, I’m not invested in this topic. I haven’t used Twitch in years nor have I subscribed to anyone. Used to watch the games done quick charity events live every now and again but it’s kinda fallen off …
It's interesting that many Twitch streamers seem like sketchy fuckers at best and absolute human garbage at worst (pedophiles etc.).
Even if all these allegations turn out to be a nothingburger, I still wouldn't want to talk to this guy, he seems like an asshole.
Dude are you like...retarded? what the fuck does cheating on your wife have to do with being pedo? what the fuck is this clown world. The internet was a mistake.He was unfaithful to his wife and came on stream crying about it to farm views 5 or 6 years ago. Who knows if these allegations are true, but it wouldn't be surprising in the least.
Reading some of these replies you might want to change that colour to orange.Has the lynch mob apologized yet?
Reading some of these replies you might want to change that colour to orange.
People coming into this thread, accusing him of pedophilia and other insane crimes, and then trying to duck behind "that's just my 2 cents based on nothing" is the biggest caveman behavior I've seen on GAF in a while.
I would just like to remind you guys that slander is a real crime, and "but that's just my opinion" ain't going to cut it in that instance.
I wonder how you would feel when a GAF mod would ban you without context, and you'd have to watch how the forum go "Damn, for GAF to ban him out of nothing, it sure had to be something Insane! I bet he's a pedophile!".
But that's just my 2 cents based on nothing.
The disrespect from this one.He had nearly 4 years to think about what to say knowing this would inevitably come out and he doesn't deny anything, yikes
That is not true. Illegal search and seizure only applies to government.Hypotetically, if Twitch's evidence was DM's that were illegal or against company policy for employees to access (or were never disclosed to users as being accessible by others) they would presumably be inadmissible in court, giving Doc an open and shut case against them on breach, defamation, punitive, etc...and giving police nothing to investigate (assuming anything supposedly said would even qualify as criminal, which it most likely would not, as someone of his stature would have to be a Level 100 Master Retard to be DM'ing that kind of stuff on fucking Twitch).
This hypothetical breach of contract case is civil and one of the parties (Amazon) owns and manages the platform at issue, which means they have sole control of, and would effectively be producing the evidence of both parties. Evidence they may have accessed without cause, without authorization, contrary to company policy, and without knowledge or disclosure to both parties (even ignoring the most obvious, that they or an activist employee could have outright fabricated them). There are 100 million and 1 ways to have these alleged DMs tossed out. They'd never even come close, which is why they didn't even pretend or entertain fighting him.That is not true. Illegal search and seizure only applies to government.
No correlation between the two other than both being degenerate behavior. Just establishing the low baseline of his moral character and recognizing degenerate people do degenerate things.Dude are you like...retarded? what the fuck does cheating on your wife have to do with being pedo? what the fuck is this clown world. The internet was a mistake.
I’m pretty sure at the Salem witch trials the accused denied being witches lolThere's so little evidence of wrongdoing that people are using his response as evidence of his wrongdoing. That's the kind of mental gymnastics they used at the witch trials.
"Are you a Witch?"There's so little evidence of wrongdoing that people are using his response as evidence of his wrongdoing. That's the kind of mental gymnastics they used at the witch trials.
Because to me it seems like a settlement was agreed on. He can't mention any wrongdoing from twitch (likely employees reading private DMs) or it's referring to a settlement by himself with the girl too.I don’t see how any sort of agreement would stop him from simply saying “this accusation is false.”
But I’m sort of over the story unless something more comes out.
There's so little evidence of wrongdoing that people are using his response as evidence of his wrongdoing. That's the kind of mental gymnastics they used at the witch trials.
It doesn’t make him guilty but I just can’t fathom how any settlement would stop him from saying “that isn’t true / that’s false” or anything more direct to an accusation if it is, in fact, false.Because to me it seems like a settlement was agreed on. He can't mention any wrongdoing from twitch (likely employees reading private DMs) or it's referring to a settlement by himself with the girl too.
"No wrongdoing was acknowledged" tells me that it's a settlement with the "no admission of guilt" thrown in with the settlement. It was probably a Freudian slip for him to say it like that. It doesn't make him guilty of anything, it's akin to Micheal Jackson's settlement with Jordan Chandler and his family. Nobody is allowed to talk about anything because it would be against the settlement agreement of the parties involved.
Something like that would not be part of the agreement but I suspect because he can't fabricate things that weren't true. If say for example an ex Micheal Jackson bodyguard/employee said "Micheal offered alcohol to Chandler" Micheal Jackson couldn't come and say "I didn't offer alcohol, that's false" unless it actually was but the settlement could allow him to say "I didn't do anything illegal and no wrongdoing was found" since the issue has been settled with all the parties involved in the matter. There may be some truth to the Twitch employees tweet and if there isn't Dr Disrespect can go after him for defamation if he wanted. Maybe he just doesn't want to or maybe because he can't.It doesn’t make him guilty but I just can’t fathom how any settlement would stop him from saying “that isn’t true / that’s false” or anything more direct to an accusation if it is, in fact, false.
“You can’t directly deny completely false statements from ex employees” would certainly be a strange legal agreement.
Either way as I said not gonna damn the guy and think the story should die unless something else besides that one ex employees statement comes out.
One former Twitch employee, who asked to remain anonymous citing the potential risk to their career, told The Verge that Beahm had used Whispers, Twitch’s now-defunct messaging system, to exchange messages with a minor and initiate a conversation about meeting up at TwitchCon. The employee worked on Twitch’s trust and safety team at the time of the ban in 2020.
The former employee who spoke with The Verge also shared more insight into the order of events that led to the ban. They said there was a significant amount of time between when the messages between Beahm and the alleged victim were sent and when the moderation report about those messages was filed, but they weren’t able to recall how much time. When Twitch received the report in 2020, they said that Twitch investigated the claims and ultimately banned Beahm’s channel.
A year after being banned, Beahm said he was suing Twitch for monetary damages and disclosed that he finally knew why the platform issued the ban. However, Beahm declined to say what that was. A year later, the dispute was resolved with Beahm saying, “I have resolved my legal dispute with Twitch. No party admits to any wrongdoing.”
"Are you a Witch?"
"No wrong doing was found."
Sequel in AC Hexe